New In House Union Effort UPU
#32
More like the FDX pilots who are MUCH happier in ALPA than solo....
The DAL pilots who keep making gains inside AND outside of Section 6
The AK pilots who make near top wages for 737, and seeing a net gain of
20-30 airframes over the next 4 years.
The Spirit pilots who were supported in a strike and made HUGE gains with ALPA
HA pilots who have a solid contract, defended very well by ALPA through a sham bankruptcy, and now growing and steady advancement and hiring for their pilots.
...and though its NOT nearly enough, the UCAL CBA that will FINALLY get the road to recovery started for UAL pilots and improve the CAL pilots lives considerably also.
OR
The Comair pilots who took 3 rounds of concessions and still shut down
The Pinnacle pilots who are about to take 9% pay cuts and see their list cut by 2/3
ExpressJet pilots (UAL side) who will probably see their flying and jobs cut to accommodate the new ALPA negotiated UCAL scope clause and the likely reduction of airframes and block hours.
Who has more reason to approve of ALPA?
#34
#36
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: C172
Posts: 122
New in house union is the biggest mistake possible,
The union is you, if you don't like what you see then fix it, get involved , serve etc......
Blame yourselves not others.
You need to put all differences aside. Take a step backwards, organize the team with a common goal and take as many possible Alpa national positions as you can
Ex Alpa member
The union is you, if you don't like what you see then fix it, get involved , serve etc......
Blame yourselves not others.
You need to put all differences aside. Take a step backwards, organize the team with a common goal and take as many possible Alpa national positions as you can
Ex Alpa member
#38
The TA's approval was much less an approval of ALPA than you imply. There are thousands of reasons individuals pulled the yes lever and opted out of the fight. I'd bet many of them had zero confidence in ALPA to improve the TA, and simply caved. That's not an endorsement.
That's just my two cents. I voted no based on the merits of the TA. My problems are with the leadership and mechanics, not the concept.
That's just my two cents. I voted no based on the merits of the TA. My problems are with the leadership and mechanics, not the concept.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post