Search

Notices

Signing bonus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2013, 06:00 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,861
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
As I have a few folks posting here on ignore, I am not reading all the posts. Thanks for posting that info. I am probably included in that law suit de facto since I've been on mil leave for a while. From what I read in USERRA, I got exactly what I was required to get by law. I think others read it differently, hence the suit. There is history here, I know, as we (CAL mil guys) had a law suit against the company about 2 years ago for violating federal law. The lawsuit was a push as no damages were awarded, but the company also had to change many of it's practices. I don't think they'll/we'll get anything in this case. It's up to ALPA whether they hold back money for this.

BTW, many of us took mil leave when they were furloughing to try and keep guys without that option on the property. They didn't officially count against the numbers, but when you drop a 4 year tour on them, they have to staff for your absence. I was not even close to furlough, but had the option and took it.

Again, I don't think this case will go any where as the distribution looked to me to be in accordance with the USERRA directives.
Hopefully that 4 year tour allowed you accumulate enough points for a full retirement.

Also - a very sincere thank you for your service.
Shrek is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 07:37 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
No worries. Glad to do it. Thanks.
Hurry back, a Dook hater is always needed in the fold.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 08:15 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Thanks for the nice words. I'm counting the days to get back. Really looking forward to it. At Special- there's been way too much Dook love in this forum. You guys be kind to each other. Jeffys going to do his best to cause problems. Lets not take the hate out on one another. Life's too short to not enjoy the cockpit conversations.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 09:00 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
Thanks for the nice words. I'm counting the days to get back. Really looking forward to it. At Special- there's been way too much Dook love in this forum. You guys be kind to each other. Jeffys going to do his best to cause problems. Lets not take the hate out on one another. Life's too short to not enjoy the cockpit conversations.
Agree my friend. Be safe.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 06-14-2013, 03:31 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Default

BTW Mark Duffer was the CAL ALPA mil rep before all of this and resigned ver all of this. Also, I have firsthand knowledge that DAL pilots on mil leave during their merger received a substantial bonus without working a day for their company. i believe that may be the basis for the law suit.
tmac3333 is offline  
Old 06-14-2013, 05:00 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
Only problem with that is it will come out of the pockets of those who were here busting their butts under horrible work rules and conditions.
Woah, hold on. Based on reading the text from the SLI process, I understood that the CAL side didn't want improved work rules. They said so themselves... It was all good until the UAL side insisted on improved work rules that actually cost something (which UAL already had), which they (CALPA) are adamantly against. Because money is everything. Seriously, it's in the transcripts.

Scott
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 06-15-2013, 05:33 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Stoops
Woah, hold on. Based on reading the text from the SLI process, I understood that the CAL side didn't want improved work rules. They said so themselves... It was all good until the UAL side insisted on improved work rules that actually cost something (which UAL already had), which they (CALPA) are adamantly against. Because money is everything. Seriously, it's in the transcripts.

Scott
You guys need to quit acting like the CAL pilots are writing this stuff and putting words in the SLI committees mouth. We're not. But, here's a surprising fact: the CAL SLI committee is trying to get the best result for the CAL pilots. That's what we want them to do. Here's another surprising fact. The UAL committee is trying to get the best result for the UAL guys. I want them to do that too. It's their job. Why do people not get this. It's a bunch of LAWYERS arguing their cases. Lawyers lie, cheat, steal, and do whatever they need to do to prove their case. They are like criminals themselves. No offense to the criminals out there.

In all seriousness, let the committee's do their work. Quit reading the transcripts all day. It will drive you crazy. The list will be somewhere in the middle of the two proposals. Always is. That's why it goes to arbitration.

Cheers Stoops. I look forward to flying with you all in a few months when I get back. Hopefully, we can help make this airline into one of the best in the world. Though we're going to need help from management.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 06-15-2013, 06:08 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,861
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
You guys need to quit acting like the CAL pilots are writing this stuff and putting words in the SLI committees mouth. We're not. But, here's a surprising fact: the CAL SLI committee is trying to get the best result for the CAL pilots. That's what we want them to do. Here's another surprising fact. The UAL committee is trying to get the best result for the UAL guys. I want them to do that too. It's their job. Why do people not get this. It's a bunch of LAWYERS arguing their cases. Lawyers lie, cheat, steal, and do whatever they need to do to prove their case. They are like criminals themselves. No offense to the criminals out there.

In all seriousness, let the committee's do their work. Quit reading the transcripts all day. It will drive you crazy. The list will be somewhere in the middle of the two proposals. Always is. That's why it goes to arbitration.

Cheers Stoops. I look forward to flying with you all in a few months when I get back. Hopefully, we can help make this airline into one of the best in the world. Though we're going to need help from management.
That is going to be the shocker to many former CAL (sry Ex-Cons) pilots IMO. It WON'T be in the middle. BUT I can't wait for one council and one list - had enough fun on this SLI ride.
Shrek is offline  
Old 06-15-2013, 05:16 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
You are correct, Staller! I did not make any of those as I was a Navigator for a short 6 years, and looking back on it I would not change a thing. The shorter commitment and the timing of my exit paved the way for me to be here, not to mention the wife and kids and all the great friends along the way.

If you can't get over the fact that I don't support the mission (as millions of other Americans do not), you are the one with the problem.

BTW, I've heard all the Navigator jokes, unless you have a new one. I'll even let you tell them while you're pulling my gear...
You should be proud of being a navigator. Look at you now - a front row seat. I do have one correction for your little dig highlited above -
First, there is no way I would pull gear for you or any cal guy and there is no way you'll ever be senior enough to pull gear for me. That's a good thing in case you don't understand.
Staller is offline  
Old 06-16-2013, 04:22 AM
  #70  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Staller
You should be proud of being a navigator. Look at you now - a front row seat. I do have one correction for your little dig highlited above -
First, there is no way I would pull gear for you or any cal guy and there is no way you'll ever be senior enough to pull gear for me. That's a good thing in case you don't understand.

Couple of questions for you:

Who do you fly for?
What plane do you fly and what is your seniority on it?
Where are you based?

You throw a lot of comments out, yet hide behind the keyboard in anoniminity.........hard to take anything you say seriously.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LCAL dude
United
47
09-08-2012 06:11 PM
citation35hf
Regional
66
04-02-2012 04:56 PM
SrfNFly227
Military
12
08-29-2008 07:28 AM
captainkudzu
Regional
11
04-12-2007 04:01 PM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
13
10-20-2006 05:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices