Search

Notices

My opinion (worthless)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2012, 12:15 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
There are no contractual provisions that stop CAL from hiring, paying profit sharing, training, etc. We can't fight what your current contract says the company can do because our contract doesn't prevent it.

LOA 25 only potentially INCREASES longevity pay for furloughees. Potentially up to full DOH. Current contract provides ZERO longevity. This LOA increases that.

LOA 25 provides full furlough longevity credit to all CAL and UAL pilots except the United pilots hired between 1999 and 2001. The TA also has language in it that will apply it to all pilots in the future. You can provide it to everyone equally, or no one at all, but you can't discriminate to a carved out group.

" The duty of fair representation is incumbent upon U.S. labor unions that are the exclusive bargaining representative of workers in a particular group. It is the obligation to represent all employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination."
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 12:18 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
LOA 25 only potentially INCREASES longevity pay for furloughees. Potentially up to full DOH. Current contract provides ZERO longevity. This LOA increases that.
You mean like what has already been done in the TA for all other pilots except the ones carved out by LOA 25? Don't trip yourself falling all over the sycophants espousing only half the story at the roadshows.

oops.. sorry Coto, I must have been typing when you posted....what you said.
Freddriver5 is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 12:59 PM
  #23  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
LOA 25 provides full furlough longevity credit to all CAL and UAL pilots except the United pilots hired between 1999 and 2001. The TA also has language in it that will apply it to all pilots in the future. You can provide it to everyone equally, or no one at all, but you can't discriminate to a carved out group.

" The duty of fair representation is incumbent upon U.S. labor unions that are the exclusive bargaining representative of workers in a particular group. It is the obligation to represent all employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination."
Using this logic the payrates should be equal across the board. They aren't so certain groups were "carved out" also, why the different rules for global and basic. Another carve out. Year 1 pilots get a 98% raise. WOW. I want that. I was "carved out" because I'm 12 yrs + so I didn't get a 98% raise. CAL guys get an increase in their B plan contribution. I won't. Another carve out.

I don't disagree that every pilot should get full pay longevity, but this is an ADDED thing that we currently don't have. So the argument is that it should have been even better.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 01:16 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
I don't disagree that every pilot should get full pay longevity, but this is an ADDED thing that we currently don't have. So the argument is that it should have been even better.
No, the argument is the ADDED thing should be applied equally since neither side had it previously.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 01:36 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

Take a UAL pilot hired January 1 2000 and a CAL pilot hired the same date. The UAL Pilot was furloughed for 4.5 years and the CAL pilot for 4. Upon signing of the TA, the CAL pilot gets full longevity credit and the UAL pilot gets none. After the SLI is complete, the UAL pilot may get additional longevity credit, but that will be tied to a CAL pilot hired after him. How is that fair, in good faith, and without discrimination?
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 01:38 PM
  #26  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
No, the argument is the ADDED thing should be applied equally since neither side had it previously.
I get it. I'm just not sure of the dynamics here. ALPA can't just do this on their own. This is something the company has to agree to because they are the ones paying it. It was communicated at the road show that they wanted full but the company said they'd give a certain number, but not more than that.

So I completely understand that as a percentage, some will get 100% and some will get 40% and I don't really know the legal aspects of what this means.

If I were ALPA I'd file the answer as "We want that too. Judge force the company to give it to them." But until SLI happens, there isn't any harm done because nothing is being taken away.

Let's just hope for an SLI that rewards your longevity with regards to when you were an active pilot for United and respects everyone's contribution on both sides.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 01:40 PM
  #27  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
Take a UAL pilot hired January 1 2000 and a CAL pilot hired the same date. The UAL Pilot was furloughed for 4.5 years and the CAL pilot for 4. Upon signing of the TA, the CAL pilot gets full longevity credit and the UAL pilot gets none. After the SLI is complete, the UAL pilot may get additional longevity credit, but that will be tied to a CAL pilot hired after him. How is that fair, in good faith, and without discrimination?
You got me. I don't see anywhere where it decides between CAL and UAL pilots. It looks like its just by date and not by legacy carrier.

I think this is an interesting and emotional point for sure.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 02:21 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
Take a UAL pilot hired January 1 2000 and a CAL pilot hired the same date. The UAL Pilot was furloughed for 4.5 years and the CAL pilot for 4. Upon signing of the TA, the CAL pilot gets full longevity credit and the UAL pilot gets none. After the SLI is complete, the UAL pilot may get additional longevity credit, but that will be tied to a CAL pilot hired after him. How is that fair, in good faith, and without discrimination?
It's not. And if you think LOA 25 will be something that will be negotiated further with a "NO" vote, you are SORELY mistaken. Just like in pay banding, LOA is a function of the UAL guys going up against something the company AND the CAL group wants. It simply isn't going to happen. The best chance the furloughed pilots have for full longevity is to vote yes, try to get the UAL MEC in control of the combined pilot group, and then get longevity restored outside of Section 6. It's a BUM DEAL, but unfortunately that is the reality of tri-party negotiations.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 02:25 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by CleCapt
Somebody has been drinking a little too much kool-aid at the road shows.

I guess all the UAL pilots need to know is "Cherry or Grape?"

My best advice to L-UAL is to talk to the UAL guys flying at CAL right now. Talk to them about contract abuse and how the company interprets the contract in THEIR favor.
The language of this TA is NOT strong enough to prevent this from continuing for another 4 years and beyond. Don't be swayed by a few extra dollars in your pocket. If this gets past the pilots, there will be a big "I told you so" 6 months from now when you see the company's interpretation of this POS TA.

Do what the Union has asked you to do. Look at the TA as a whole, not just the money. Look at the changes in you Quality of Life. The company is buying 51% of the pilots and that's all.
Well, considering that the work rules are TOTALLY different in the TA than present CAL work rules, why would the abuses they suffer under your current contract apply? The work rules are extremely similar to UAL's, and we've been living under them for a long time. The BIG things that were lacking were rules that prevented the company from scheduling the crap 10 hour 3 days and 15 hour 4 days that I get at least twice a month. In this contract, that has been solved. For the first time since the 80's.

The "I told you so" would be substantially more fierce from the L-UAL "Yes" voters to the "No" voters when they watch CAL hire 60 a month, take delivery of new airplanes every month, and endure continued shrinkage.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 06:52 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,041
Default

Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
Hockeypilot...it's too hard to read anything you write without you whining and bashing your old place of employment (RAH). Please stick to what you're good at.
Back to the regional boards. You are still in the minors.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PC12Luvr
Corporate
8
01-18-2012 01:14 PM
Flyguppy
Mergers and Acquisitions
29
05-03-2010 04:36 AM
Whacker77
Major
70
10-16-2009 07:54 PM
jsfBoat
Flight Schools and Training
3
04-22-2008 07:56 PM
sdpilot75
Major
31
03-13-2008 12:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices