Search

Notices

Switched.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2012, 06:55 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude
What Retro? We're getting a signing bonus that's pennies on the dollar of the retro pay they've stolen from me since the contract expired... excuse me, became amendable 4 years ago.
Do you remember what was going on economically four years ago? My neighbor at the time was a finance guy involved in global investments for pension and other retirement plans for a well known company. He was scared to death and pacing the house in the middle of the night. What do you think the odds of keeping a premium contract would have been if you had it back then? Had you been sitting there with anything other than Contract 02 at that time, you would have taken a beating. Your retro losses are a figment of your imagination.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 07:02 PM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,017
Default

As a DAL guy the 6 weeks of vacation and 16% retirement look pretty good. For comparison we top out at only 5 weeks of vacation and are now at 14% going to 15% for retirement.


Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 07:18 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,905
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly

This agreement is a major disappointment to me. However, if we want to get what we want we have to even out this fight, and the first step is to unify the pilot group. (Even though as a UA pilot in the bottom half of the list, I am none too excited about SLI).
I just have to ask because this has been a common refrain when talking to the L-UAL pilots: why does voting YES and getting past the SLI process mean we are going to be unified? Why is that the only way that can happen? I'm not asking to be a jerk or to stir the pot. I'm only trying to find out why, if this contract is not that great for L-UAL pilots either, just accepting it and is the best way to move on and unify the pilots?

Wouldn't it also show pilot unity if there was a strong, firm NO vote? "Sorry, this contract is unacceptable and we deserve better as this pilot group has shown with their vote."

I keep hearing we need to come together now so we can be unified for the next time. The next time? How often do we keep hearing "well, we'll be unified and stronger NEXT time?" We've been hearing that at L-CAL for a long time for various reasons. When are pilots going to take a stand NOW?
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 12:42 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
uaav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 374
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
I just have to ask because this has been a common refrain when talking to the L-UAL pilots: why does voting YES and getting past the SLI process mean we are going to be unified? Why is that the only way that can happen? I'm not asking to be a jerk or to stir the pot. I'm only trying to find out why, if this contract is not that great for L-UAL pilots either, just accepting it and is the best way to move on and unify the pilots?

Wouldn't it also show pilot unity if there was a strong, firm NO vote? "Sorry, this contract is unacceptable and we deserve better as this pilot group has shown with their vote."

I keep hearing we need to come together now so we can be unified for the next time. The next time? How often do we keep hearing "well, we'll be unified and stronger NEXT time?" We've been hearing that at L-CAL for a long time for various reasons. When are pilots going to take a stand NOW?
Getting past the SLI to me means more than being unified. It means that perhaps I too can have a shot at the left seat of all those "United" planes out there at our hubs. After 15 years of "juniority" I'm sitting 5 or 6 from the bottom on perpetual reserve in the right seat. I have not progressed a single number on the 756 right seat in 5 years. In fact I've moved backwards. 12 years ago I was a solid lineholder in the same seat. In 9 months we will commence the parking of 85 757's. That's not good news. The replacement aircraft are 737-900ER's, of which we have no simulators, no PI's, no training syllabus and no payscale. Pretty sure that training will be taking place in your training center in IAH, with or without us. Unified to me means having a fair shot at the progression that is taking place in "the other half" of United Airlines. That is why this SLI process needs to happen as rapidly as possible for sUALers like myself. Voted YES on November 30th. That, my friend, is as honest an answer as I can give you.

Last edited by uaav8r; 12-05-2012 at 12:57 PM.
uaav8r is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 02:34 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
Getting past the SLI to me means more than being unified. It means that perhaps I too can have a shot at the left seat of all those "United" planes out there at our hubs. After 15 years of "juniority" I'm sitting 5 or 6 from the bottom on perpetual reserve in the right seat. I have not progressed a single number on the 756 right seat in 5 years. In fact I've moved backwards. 12 years ago I was a solid lineholder in the same seat. In 9 months we will commence the parking of 85 757's. That's not good news. The replacement aircraft are 737-900ER's, of which we have no simulators, no PI's, no training syllabus and no payscale. Pretty sure that training will be taking place in your training center in IAH, with or without us. Unified to me means having a fair shot at the progression that is taking place in "the other half" of United Airlines. That is why this SLI process needs to happen as rapidly as possible for sUALers like myself. Voted YES on November 30th. That, my friend, is as honest an answer as I can give you.
And it's a good honest answer. Unfortunately, the L-UAL pilots have seen several maneuvers by the CAL union leadership that makes them feel less than "unified". LOA 25, Pay Banding, profit sharing done outside of required try-party negotiations.... None of that is bringing any unity. As uaav8r points out, the next hurdle is the planes leaving L-UAL and where they go. Let's say Captain Pierce's past actions haven't left us feeling warm and fuzzy. And I haven't seen one L-CAL pilot stand up and suggest that they wouldn't fly the new planes if presented to them at L-UAL's expense. If this TA passes, we will get through the SLI with pretty much everyone being disappointed (the sign of a successful merger), and then we can move on. At that point, all events effect the pilot group EVENLY. As it stands now, one groups pain is usually the others gain. And it's been a smidge one-sided, wouldn't you say??
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 09:48 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
And it's a good honest answer. Unfortunately, the L-UAL pilots have seen several maneuvers by the CAL union leadership that makes them feel less than "unified". LOA 25, Pay Banding, profit sharing done outside of required try-party negotiations.... None of that is bringing any unity. As uaav8r points out, the next hurdle is the planes leaving L-UAL and where they go. Let's say Captain Pierce's past actions haven't left us feeling warm and fuzzy. And I haven't seen one L-CAL pilot stand up and suggest that they wouldn't fly the new planes if presented to them at L-UAL's expense. If this TA passes, we will get through the SLI with pretty much everyone being disappointed (the sign of a successful merger), and then we can move on. At that point, all events effect the pilot group EVENLY. As it stands now, one groups pain is usually the others gain. And it's been a smidge one-sided, wouldn't you say??

It has, to an extent. And yes, if most could, we would not fly the new aircraft. The problem is that the new aircraft are replacing the aircraft we are parking on a one-for-one basis. The same is true for the 787. We will finish parking all 767-200's sometime in 2013.

Our point is we understand and do see the transfer of assets possibly going to happen at LUAL. We have also seen this new aircraft order for a TA BS in the past also. It didn't end very well. Here, sign C02 and you can fly a shinny new 787.

A large number of us watched the CA seats we waited 9+ years for, disappear with age 65 as well as having Abbot tell us why he was slashing EWR flying and cutting even more CA seats to make it better for "commuters".

We just don't want the LUAL pilots to bite on a substandard TA in the hopes of eliminating said transfer. How disappointed do you we will ALL be if this TA is voted in and the SLI takes 18 months and the transfer happens anyway? Mgmt is gonna do what mgmt wants to do. All we can do is not bite on the division they have created so far.
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 12-05-2012, 09:50 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
I just have to ask because this has been a common refrain when talking to the L-UAL pilots: why does voting YES and getting past the SLI process mean we are going to be unified? Why is that the only way that can happen? I'm not asking to be a jerk or to stir the pot. I'm only trying to find out why, if this contract is not that great for L-UAL pilots either, just accepting it and is the best way to move on and unify the pilots?

Wouldn't it also show pilot unity if there was a strong, firm NO vote? "Sorry, this contract is unacceptable and we deserve better as this pilot group has shown with their vote."

I keep hearing we need to come together now so we can be unified for the next time. The next time? How often do we keep hearing "well, we'll be unified and stronger NEXT time?" We've been hearing that at L-CAL for a long time for various reasons. When are pilots going to take a stand NOW?

If this TA passes, why would anyone think that there would be more unity the next time around?
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 12-06-2012, 06:54 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Hopefully, there will be less division which will lead to unity. There certainly won't be one group trying to get a leg up on the other, at the expense of the other and the TA. Think of the profit sharing debacle, pay banding, leaks etc. For you guys to NOT recognize just how much of an obstacle JPOS has been to this effort either smacks of ignorance of the process or arrogance. Leverage lost if you will. You would see our point if on this side of the fence. We have certainly seen yours.

Unfortunately, by then the reality of this crappy TA will have set in. I fear that means we will have to put most of our capital into fixing all the concessionary work rule changes and loose language in the contract. We will again have to fight scope and cabotage. We will have to attempt to get the reserves out of indentured servitude. As a result, there will be minimal financial gains and we will again lag behind Delta. After that, I'll retire, still looking for that brass ring and big bag of cash I was promised under the Elroy Jepp statue in Denver.
oldmako is offline  
Old 12-06-2012, 07:48 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

If this TA passes, why would anyone think that there would be more unity the next time around?
There will always be hard feelings and that are going to be caused by this merger. Hard feelings that are both real and imagined it makes no difference.

The difference comes in when we are all on the same sheet of paper IE JCBA and ISL then it becomes impossible for management to use the separate pilot groups as leverage against each other. Whether we like each other or not.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 12-06-2012, 07:53 AM
  #20  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
......The problem is that the new aircraft are replacing the aircraft we are parking on a one-for-one basis......
Not the 737-900ERs that were ordered after the merger. They are intended as UAL 757 replacements but will be hard pressed to go there without a JCBA.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill Lumberg
Major
20
06-10-2012 05:58 AM
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
2
02-28-2009 09:50 AM
HoursHore
Hangar Talk
8
05-23-2008 08:14 AM
flyinhigh6165
Regional
23
01-31-2007 09:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices