Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Taking a picture of my "YES" vote now >

Taking a picture of my "YES" vote now

Search

Notices

Taking a picture of my "YES" vote now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2012, 06:57 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by Mwindaji
So pilots are taking pictures of their YES or NO votes. Correct me if I wrong about this, but can’t a pilot change his/her vote up until 15 DEC. I guess there will be some pilots with two photos on their phone. Depending who they fly with they can show the photo that makes them look good.
I just hope they pass the drug test when they get to the gate.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 12-02-2012, 07:14 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
I encourage you to do so and please stick a copy of your vote on your flight bag so that months after this thing passes and you're scratching your heads saying, "Wow scheduling can really do that to me" or "why are we getting all of these super low paying EMB-190's to replace our A-319's", us no voters can laugh directly in your face.

These brave Yes voters apparently haven't read this depressing document from cover to cover as no sane man would ever vote in such a concessionary agreement whilst working for the supposedly number one airline in the world.

Looking forward to seeing your stickers !!
Oh I get it. Keep the old contracts in place to save the A319s and such. The new one will make them go away and you will laugh at us. I should be reading more carefully and understanding contracts like you.



FAQ > SECTION 1 - SCOPE > CAN THE COMPANY REPLACE CURRENT NARROW BODY AIRCRAFT (A319/320) WITH ""NEW"" SMALL NARROW BODY AIRCRAFT (100 SEATERS, CS300, EMB 190/195)?"
Search the FAQ for entries containing:

However unlikely that may be, no there is no such guarantee. If the company were to decide to replace our current fleet with a totally different fleet they could do that today, as could any other carrier. We suspect the SNB is likely going to give us the ability to fly to new destinations that aren’t cost effective today with either the 737/A320s aircraft type. Ultimately, where those aircraft fly will be the Marketing Departments decision.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 12-02-2012, 07:37 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LCAL dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
Not slime balls at all, Hoss didn't mean it that way. Just some former flight school direct to RJ pilots that used to give us rides to and from work at United now getting to the left seat ahead of us at.....where else.....United. What could possibly be wrong with that?
Quite a bit. The flight school-RJ guys didn't start showing up until late 2000 and were promptly furloughed after 9/11, and only came back to the RJ FO seat in 2005, so if they're at LCal they're junior FOs. The RJs mainline pilots gave away because they were too good to fly those "itty bitty jets that weren't real airplanes and and not a threat to their careers" didn't show up until 1998, and junior SLUF Captain at LCal is a '96ish Express/other regional/ex-military hire.

Pilots who got hired by the majors in the mid-90s (like some friends of mine) probably started at a regional in the '88-'91 era, when there was a pilot shortage and the regionals were only flying Jetstream, MetroLiner, or Bandit turboprops. I went through 4 instructors getting my ratings in the late 80s/early 90s because as soon as they got 50/500 they were gone. Those guys built time in turboprops and their first jet was a mainline 737, generally around 1994-onward.


To get hired at a regional airline in the mid-90s (like the junior LCal Captains) was highly competitive, my class had a bunch of corporate, ex-mil, and freight dogs, and I was the low time guy with 2,500 hours. After that we flew turboprops, getting a lot of experience doing multiple legs/day in the slag before the RJs started showing up in '98. We were RJ Captains before we got hired at LCal in 2000/01, and after 9/11 we got furloughed back to Express and spent another 4-5 years as RJ Captains flying mainline routes.

My generation has a lot of respect for any LUal pilot who has had to suffer through years in the right seat yanking gear in a 73/5/67, but any 7 year LCal 73 Captain already has several years as a jet Captain under their belt flying all over Canada, Mexico, and the U.S.. So when you're bashing LCal pilots, remember who the real enemy is. (Hint: he's in my avatar.)


Oh, and we voted down 2 contract at Express, got better ones the second time, and got Full Retro Pay. They have the money, we deserve the money, It can be done.

Last edited by LCAL dude; 12-02-2012 at 08:06 PM.
LCAL dude is offline  
Old 12-02-2012, 10:02 PM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
DaveNelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: B-737 Captain, IAH
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
Get over it.

THERE WAS A GREAT PUSH FOR A NATIONAL SENIORITY LIST SEVERAL TIMES IN alpa HISTORY. Most recently (late 1980's) it was shot down by loud mouthed UAL pilots. So blame it on your elder coworkers, the same ones that loved to let a CAL jump seater get all "settled" and then throw them off, telling them they "just couldn't ride" only moments before push time.
Does anybody believe that there was ever a chance of instituting a national seniority list? ALPA could piece together any kind of list it wanted. Convincing Delta's management to hire United's pilots might have been a sticking point, though.

The "closed shop" concept, the old union hiring hall, went away with the Taft/Hartley Act of 1947. Corporations take a bit of umbrage when unions try to tell them whom they can and cannot hire.
DaveNelson is offline  
Old 12-03-2012, 04:43 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

A national seniority list sure worked well for the merchant marine industry.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 12-03-2012, 06:23 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Great work by all here. Nice to know that pilots at the world's largest airline can overcome politics and rationally discuss issues one at a time without succumbing to name calling and innuendo. I'm so proud to be a pilot and am sure that the thousands of outside viewers perusing our forum are just wishing they too could be pilots like us.


There is no "right" and "wrong" answer here. There is only your opinion so why not try to act a little more civil and use facts to explain why you came to YOUR opinion rather than denigrate those that don't share that opinion. Just a thought . . .
Joe Peck
IADFO
Sunvox is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 04:01 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by DaveNelson
Does anybody believe that there was ever a chance of instituting a national seniority list? ALPA could piece together any kind of list it wanted. Convincing Delta's management to hire United's pilots might have been a sticking point, though.
.
I personally think a National Seniority List is in all of our Long Term best interest, but.......Until there is One Union representing ALL US Pilots, a National Seniority list is worthless.

What would happen if ALPA had a national Seniority list but an ALPA carrier merges with a Non ALPA carrier......SWA and AirTran? What good is the list?or TWA and AMR (sorry to pull scab off an old wound)

What would happen when 2 independent carriers merge.....USairways and AA merge. What if some USair Westies (or Easties) are still inactive ALPA members?

What happens when non Union Upstarts get purchased by ALPA carriers. Virgin America, Allegiant or Jet Blue (jet Blue is no longer an upstart)

One Union one Voice...........I don't care if it is ALPA, USA Pilots Association or
"Judean People's Front" or the "Front of the Judean People" or People's Front of Judea" there would first need to be an organization representing ALL Pilots before a national Seniority list would have a chance of working.

Looking to the future, what happens when a Foreign Airline is purchased by an American Carrier, or worse when the Foreign Airline purchases an American Carrier? Delta - Virgin Atlantic or Emirates buys AMR?
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 05:05 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Lots of good info here. I wish you guys the best it will be a tough road ahead but I'm sure it will work out. One thought from an outsider...the comments about "sign it and get it over with" "something about moving on so you can level the playing field?" I'd be real careful with that idea about a contract. Especially with length. I'm sure there were guys at AA that thought that years ago...wait till the next contract. Their last signed contract was what? ten years ago? lets not forget how long a contract can go past its date. Just a thought. I really do hope that UAL gets back to the glory days.
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 05:46 AM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
DaveNelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: B-737 Captain, IAH
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
A national seniority list sure worked well for the merchant marine industry.
I don't know much about the merchant marine industry. But if it falls under the auspices of the Taft-Hartley Act, which I suppose it does because it's the law of the land in the United States, the closed shop is illegal.

In other words, you can do anything you want with a national seniority list on the union level. ALPA, APA, the UPS union, SWAPA, etc. could theoretically have a big arbitration and "merge" their lists. Good luck getting Southwest Airlines to let me bid the next captain vacancy over there that my "seniority holds."

There's no way a union can compel an employer to hire only members of that union. A union can negotiate agency shop provisions, making it mandatory that employees, once hired, either join the union or pay an agency shop fee. But the company makes the decision on who is hired.
DaveNelson is offline  
Old 12-04-2012, 06:18 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

The merchant marine industry in this country was a prime example of the pitfalls of a single seniority list but more so a glaring example of what happens when you allow cabotage.

Which is why you seldom if ever see a merchant vessel with a US registry. They are all registered in places like Liberia and crewed by third world nationals for the most part. This allows the corporations to bypass complicated safety issues and pay minimum wages.

Exactly the same thing that will occur if we ever let cabotage creep into our industry.

There is a great book out called "Looking for a ship" about the pitfalls of the modern merchant marine industry and the union politics involved. the single seniority list has had the opposite affect. You've got guys who were once super tanker captains taking jobs as deck hands now just to get a job.
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Torroc1492
Regional
10
08-31-2010 05:53 AM
Airfix
Regional
69
12-10-2008 09:22 AM
Confused
Regional
1
05-30-2008 06:32 PM
Haus
Cargo
139
02-15-2008 09:21 AM
Bri85
Flight Schools and Training
6
05-08-2007 10:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices