Taking a picture of my "YES" vote now
12-02-2012, 08:53 AM
#51
I'd rather be hunting
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 91
Always happy to help out another pilot. Don't give up hope. I am willing to help you continue the search no matter how many Victoria's Secret catalogs I have to look through. I am sure there are other pilots also willing to help. We will find her.
12-02-2012, 09:35 AM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
From one bruthah to another, thanks.
12-02-2012, 10:09 AM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
So this is a your logic for a yes vote?!!!!
Oh no that's not it in it's entirety. You slime balls stacking as many Jr. captains pre SLI in the list as possible, who will keep us fenced out for years is a bigger part of my logic for a yes vote.The longer we wait the more stacking that takes place on your side.
BTW Is L-CAL having another huge system bid in January?
Yes or no....
12-02-2012, 10:26 AM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
12-02-2012, 11:36 AM
#56
I'd rather be hunting
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 91
Bligh,
Oh no that's not it in it's entirety. You slime balls stacking as many Jr. captains pre SLI in the list as possible, who will keep us fenced out for years is a bigger part of my logic for a yes vote.The longer we wait the more stacking that takes place on your side.
BTW Is L-CAL having another huge system bid in January?
Yes or no....
Oh no that's not it in it's entirety. You slime balls stacking as many Jr. captains pre SLI in the list as possible, who will keep us fenced out for years is a bigger part of my logic for a yes vote.The longer we wait the more stacking that takes place on your side.
BTW Is L-CAL having another huge system bid in January?
Yes or no....
Maybe I am wrong, but the impression I am getting from you on this forum is that it is the LCAL pilots fault as to why LUAL pilots must vote yes on this TA. So LUAL pilots that vote yes are correcting some wrong they feel is being done to them by LCAL pilots and others suggest that LUAL pilots that vote no are also great guys for standing up to a contract that is below par. But LCAL pilots that did not want this merger and have no control over the process and just doing their job and progressing within their rights of their CBA are slime. Is that what you are attempting to say?
12-02-2012, 01:34 PM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Yes there is a system bid that comes out every 6 months at LCAL IAW the LCAL CBA. Could you please clarify who the slime balls are?
Maybe I am wrong, but the impression I am getting from you on this forum is that it is the LCAL pilots fault as to why LUAL pilots must vote yes on this TA. So LUAL pilots that vote yes are correcting some wrong they feel is being done to them by LCAL pilots and others suggest that LUAL pilots that vote no are also great guys for standing up to a contract that is below par. But LCAL pilots that did not want this merger and have no control over the process and just doing their job and progressing within their rights of their CBA are slime. Is that what you are attempting to say?
Maybe I am wrong, but the impression I am getting from you on this forum is that it is the LCAL pilots fault as to why LUAL pilots must vote yes on this TA. So LUAL pilots that vote yes are correcting some wrong they feel is being done to them by LCAL pilots and others suggest that LUAL pilots that vote no are also great guys for standing up to a contract that is below par. But LCAL pilots that did not want this merger and have no control over the process and just doing their job and progressing within their rights of their CBA are slime. Is that what you are attempting to say?
12-02-2012, 02:24 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
12-02-2012, 02:46 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Sorry ... I'm a L-UAL guy (not a 570, 2172, 1437 but am ex-EAL) and my "NO" vote cancelled out your yes vote. The UAL Chest Beaters are caving and voting yes. The previous UAL guys that were classified as weak are voting "NO"
We are counting on a strong "NO" vote from you CAL guys to bolster our pansy A$$ Chest Beaters!
Proudly wearing my "Vote NO" wrist band and pin!
We are counting on a strong "NO" vote from you CAL guys to bolster our pansy A$$ Chest Beaters!
Proudly wearing my "Vote NO" wrist band and pin!
12-02-2012, 03:34 PM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Bligh,
Oh no that's not it in it's entirety. You slime balls stacking as many Jr. captains pre SLI in the list as possible, who will keep us fenced out for years is a bigger part of my logic for a yes vote.The longer we wait the more stacking that takes place on your side.
BTW Is L-CAL having another huge system bid in January?
Yes or no....
Oh no that's not it in it's entirety. You slime balls stacking as many Jr. captains pre SLI in the list as possible, who will keep us fenced out for years is a bigger part of my logic for a yes vote.The longer we wait the more stacking that takes place on your side.
BTW Is L-CAL having another huge system bid in January?
Yes or no....
Many of us believe we work for a corrupt management that has infiltrated and corrupted our union at every level. Who the elf knows if they are planning a system bid in January, it like all of the BS in the TA, it will hit us when THEY decide to implement it, not when the line pilots (whom both of you seem to think is the enemy) do anything. As if line pilots could do anything.
I've been demanding accountability and fairness from both CAL management and ALPA my whole career. All that has done insure that I have very little of a future in either one. If you think any L-CAL line pilot is the enemy, you have been severely out played by the real enemy. That enemy has beaten you before the game even started and you still don't realize it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
