The Hard Sell Begins
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
I am tired of waiting. If our negotiators bring us a competive contract, I am going to vote yes. I don't need a contract 2000. I don't want "obscene" (Gordy's word) pay rates. We haven't even looked at scope, work rules, sick leave, ect. Those things cost money too. The Retro IS bs and I said so, but even that is not a kill all to me. Perhaps one of our MECs will send this back and maybe we will get a better deal, idk. I just hope it doesn't take another YEAR to get er done!
Sled
Sled
#72
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
The Hard Sell Begins
The rates are from the "leaked" (though partially confirmed by my MEC Chair) document.
It had DOS (which at this point is irrelevant as we won't possible have a JCBA before 31 Dec 12), 2013-2017 scales.
"Supposedly" it's missing A380 (lol.. Like we're gonna order that *****) and also a small aircraft pays scales.
Personally, before this leak I had numbers in my head for what I'm worth, and what I needed to see to Vote YES (purely on the compensation side of the haus). Those numbers were SLIGHTLY less than Delta's numbers.
But the more I've thought about it, the more I realized- if my CEO is worth more than RA (CEO of DAL), then why should I accept anything less than Delta?! Let alone -$14.33 to -$8.11 (an hour, based on different years).
And there's no way that work rules, B Plan or anything else is gonna be able to make up that difference~
Not to mention a 5 yr deal?!
NOPE
Motch
It had DOS (which at this point is irrelevant as we won't possible have a JCBA before 31 Dec 12), 2013-2017 scales.
"Supposedly" it's missing A380 (lol.. Like we're gonna order that *****) and also a small aircraft pays scales.
Personally, before this leak I had numbers in my head for what I'm worth, and what I needed to see to Vote YES (purely on the compensation side of the haus). Those numbers were SLIGHTLY less than Delta's numbers.
But the more I've thought about it, the more I realized- if my CEO is worth more than RA (CEO of DAL), then why should I accept anything less than Delta?! Let alone -$14.33 to -$8.11 (an hour, based on different years).
And there's no way that work rules, B Plan or anything else is gonna be able to make up that difference~
Not to mention a 5 yr deal?!
NOPE
Motch
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
The rates are from the "leaked" (though partially confirmed by my MEC Chair) document.
It had DOS (which at this point is irrelevant as we won't possible have a JCBA before 31 Dec 12), 2013-2017 scales.
"Supposedly" it's missing A380 (lol.. Like we're gonna order that *****) and also a small aircraft pays scales.
Personally, before this leak I had numbers in my head for what I'm worth, and what I needed to see to Vote YES (purely on the compensation side of the haus). Those numbers were SLIGHTLY less than Delta's numbers.
But the more I've thought about it, the more I realized- if my CEO is worth more than RA (CEO of DAL), then why should I accept anything less than Delta?! Let alone -$14.33 to -$8.11 (an hour, based on different years).
And there's no way that work rules, B Plan or anything else is gonna be able to make up that difference~
Not to mention a 5 yr deal?!
NOPE
Motch
It had DOS (which at this point is irrelevant as we won't possible have a JCBA before 31 Dec 12), 2013-2017 scales.
"Supposedly" it's missing A380 (lol.. Like we're gonna order that *****) and also a small aircraft pays scales.
Personally, before this leak I had numbers in my head for what I'm worth, and what I needed to see to Vote YES (purely on the compensation side of the haus). Those numbers were SLIGHTLY less than Delta's numbers.
But the more I've thought about it, the more I realized- if my CEO is worth more than RA (CEO of DAL), then why should I accept anything less than Delta?! Let alone -$14.33 to -$8.11 (an hour, based on different years).
And there's no way that work rules, B Plan or anything else is gonna be able to make up that difference~
Not to mention a 5 yr deal?!
NOPE
Motch
Hopefully, if it is as bad as you have heard, the MEC will reject it and we will not see it. Guess we can just wait and see.
#75
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 56
For what ever it is worth, I hear the pay rates leaked are correct until the seniority list is integrated. When the company can realize the same integration synergies that Delta currently has the pay rates go to the current Delta pay plus 1.
#76
Geez....everyone has *****ed and moaned (correctly) concerning the slow pace of negotiations. Now that a contract is near, some are already *****ing and moaning WHEN WE DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT IS IN IT!
Shouldn't a little common sense kick in before beating your chest and proposing to vote "no"? An uninformed opinion is usually a poor one.
Shouldn't a little common sense kick in before beating your chest and proposing to vote "no"? An uninformed opinion is usually a poor one.
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
Geez....everyone has *****ed and moaned (correctly) concerning the slow pace of negotiations. Now that a contract is near, some are already *****ing and moaning WHEN WE DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT IS IN IT!
Shouldn't a little common sense kick in before beating your chest and proposing to vote "no"? An uninformed opinion is usually a poor one.
Shouldn't a little common sense kick in before beating your chest and proposing to vote "no"? An uninformed opinion is usually a poor one.
#78
Obama isn't going to release us.
Are you planning to walk and shut it down? Personally, I like that idea but there wouldn't be many willing to actually do that.
There are ramifications to voting "no." Especially if you are on the UAL legacy side. The TA expires in March...I'm guessing our CAL brothers aren't too hot to renew it as they are getting all of the new aircraft and most of the bids. Do you think the company would be willing to extend it?
So...once again, what is your plan?
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
That's a promising sign. Again, it's a matter of waiting this out. It's been 900 plus days, we all need to chill out for another 5 or 6 and see what happens. I still have faith in our JNC until proven otherwise.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
I cannot argue that...if it's true. However, what is your game plan if that is the case? It's easy to beat your chest and say "no" but just what is your plan?
Obama isn't going to release us.
Are you planning to walk and shut it down? Personally, I like that idea but there wouldn't be many willing to actually do that.
There are ramifications to voting "no." Especially if you are on the UAL legacy side. The TA expires in March...I'm guessing our CAL brothers aren't too hot to renew it as they are getting all of the new aircraft and most of the bids. Do you think the company would be willing to extend it?
So...once again, what is your plan?
Obama isn't going to release us.
Are you planning to walk and shut it down? Personally, I like that idea but there wouldn't be many willing to actually do that.
There are ramifications to voting "no." Especially if you are on the UAL legacy side. The TA expires in March...I'm guessing our CAL brothers aren't too hot to renew it as they are getting all of the new aircraft and most of the bids. Do you think the company would be willing to extend it?
So...once again, what is your plan?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post