Search

Notices

TA in their hands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2012, 08:58 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,660
Default

Originally Posted by El Gwopo:1290848
so your viewpoint is in the minority

So, almost all cal pilots are lying to me...great.

Can't wait to vote no though![/QUOTE]

We'll all be watching. I'll make you a wager, I bet you a $100 amazon gift card that there is no way you will hold 50 seat scope and get a new contract.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 09:25 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude
I don't know any right seaters at Cal who are willing to give up 50 seat Scope.
Although this is true, the real battle for this demographic subset will be SLI with the UAL furloughees. Keep in mind there is also a demographic a little farther vested in our careers that isn't willing to fall on our proverbial swords for scope, any more than a reserve 737 FO would strike to protect our A fund lump sum access.

The real solution here is an MEC or ALPA national leader with enough vision (and balls) to tell management, that what they propose will cause a riff within the pilot ranks. Therefore; we (collectively) wont tolerate, nor even tender divisive offers to the pilots.

Much like the company tossing the bonus lump sum out for the union to figure out how to divide however, current leadership is on a management career path and won't make such a stand until the union's bylaws prohibit or punish ALPA officials that run off for management jobs.

-Remove them from the seniority list.
-Make them sign promissory notes.
-Negotiate them out of training department jobs.
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:19 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
The real solution here is an MEC or ALPA national leader with enough vision (and balls) to tell management, that what they propose will cause a riff within the pilot ranks.
A riff is precisely their goal. To tell them they're being successful in causing this riff will just result in smiles and high fives all around.
APC225 is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:43 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,660
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude:1290859
Originally Posted by Trip7
Holding your scope at 50 seats is unrealistic and unreasonable. Only way you will keep 50 seat scope is if you continue to keep your current CAL contract and remain separate from UAL pilots.

I believe most mainline pilots rightfully see anything 76 seats or less and below 86,000 lbs a lost cause at mainline, so your viewpoint is in the minority

This is the same mentality that allowed RJs to be flown by regional carriers in the first place.

Instead of flying a 70 seat CRJ at regional airline wages, you should be flying it at mainline wages, on a mainline seniority list, with a mainline pilot career ahead of you looking forward to progressing to 787 FO and retiring as a 777 Captain. Instead you're stuck at a regional airline, at regional airline wages, praying your company is not whipsawed against another regional for lower wages and eventually eliminated. Once you upgrade to the left seat your career progression is over, unless you get hired by one of the mainline carriers, which are shrinking because of the outsourcing you advocate.


You shouldn't be telling us to give up the fight, Noob/lurking management poster, you should be screaming at mainline pilots NOT to give up the fight against outsourcing.

I don't know any right seaters at Cal who are willing to give up 50 seat Scope.
I give UNICAL zero chance of holding 50 seat scope in a new contract. It's a completely unreasonable and unattainable goal in today's airline environment. You'll say it's management koolaide, but I'm just being realistic. There is no legacy airline in the world that flies 70-76 seat jets at mainline. Heck, Iberia has Air Nodstrum flying the CRJ 1000 as Iberia express. Air Canada had E175s at mainline and now they are getting sent to a regional due to cost pressures.

I'll make the same wager with you, $100 Amazon gift card if UNICAL can hold 50 seat scope in their new contract. All I see is you guys pounding your fists on table, management pointing and laughing, and Delta pilots making tens of thousands of dollars more than your pilot group. Good luck!
Trip7 is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 12:06 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

We will not hold the 50 seat scope in our new contract.
UalHvy is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 12:07 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LCAL dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
I give UNICAL zero chance of holding 50 seat scope in a new contract. It's a completely unreasonable and unattainable goal in today's airline environment. You'll say it's management koolaide, but I'm just being realistic. There is no legacy airline in the world that flies 70-76 seat jets at mainline. Heck, Iberia has Air Nodstrum flying the CRJ 1000 as Iberia express. Air Canada had E175s at mainline and now they are getting sent to a regional due to cost pressures.

I'll make the same wager with you, $100 Amazon gift card if UNICAL can hold 50 seat scope in their new contract. All I see is you guys pounding your fists on table, management pointing and laughing, and Delta pilots making tens of thousands of dollars more than your pilot group. Good luck!
In one ear and out the other, I'm sure one day you'll be flying a desk in the CPO, telling your pilots how they should be doing it and berating anyone who disagrees.

Good luck in your non-flying management career. If your airline survives.


Originally Posted by UalHvy
We will not hold the 50 seat scope in our new contract.
If you're not going to fight Scope for the junior pilots, don't expect them to support your fight to get your retirement back.

Last edited by LCAL dude; 11-11-2012 at 12:21 PM.
LCAL dude is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 02:06 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 194
Default

We'll all be watching. I'll make you a wager, I bet you a $100 amazon gift card that there is no way you will hold 50 seat scope and get a new contract.[/QUOTE]

Maybe we won't. I am mearly relaying what the people I fly with tell me. I will be voting no. Seems you are angry at the prospect of holding firm on 50 seats. I personally believe DAL pilots let us down in an enormous way. When they voted yes, it allowed weak people to say,"DAL set the new standard" blah blah blah. Don't care....no.
El Gwopo is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 02:18 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

Ditto. No scope = "no" vote. Hold the line. Ignore the 50 seat RJ pilots drooling over 75 seat jets.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 06:31 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by LCAL dude
In one ear and out the other, I'm sure one day you'll be flying a desk in the CPO, telling your pilots how they should be doing it and berating anyone who disagrees.

Good luck in your non-flying management career. If your airline survives.




If you're not going to fight Scope for the junior pilots, don't expect them to support your fight to get your retirement back.
I am a junior pilot. I'm just telling you that the Scope in the TA provides for 70 seaters.
UalHvy is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 06:49 PM
  #90  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
I want my obama phone now.
FYI, that program was created by the guy in office over 4 years ago.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GizmoNC
Southwest
100
05-22-2012 09:46 AM
jungle
Hangar Talk
3
06-01-2011 04:47 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
12-10-2010 12:43 PM
FlyerJosh
Hangar Talk
0
04-17-2009 07:50 AM
HSLD
Pilot Health
5
02-28-2008 05:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices