Search

Notices

New Pay Scale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2012, 07:23 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
I like your optimism but I think you are going to be disappointed just as much as the rest of us will.
I had that optimism once. Always seeing light at the end of the tunnel.
Now I realize, with this management, that it will always be another train heading my way.
UalHvy is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 07:35 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
socalflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by UalHvy
I had that optimism once. Always seeing light at the end of the tunnel.
Now I realize, with this management, that it will always be another train heading my way.
I always thought that bright light was being on the verge of death...death by scope, death by work rules, death by a sub par management!
socalflyboy is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 08:45 AM
  #153  
SLI best wishes!
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisJT6
Our MEC Chairman also points out how counterproductive it is to discredit a TA and hard work that hasnt been released in final product. I think the $400 MIL is just for the CAL side, yes that's right LAX LEC shot from the hip was not accurate according to our MEC Chairman as well.
I hope everyone with a vote uses thought before voting.
That is what I was told also. The CAL Lax rep numbers were correct and JP statement also says the numbers leaked are accurate with reference to the CAL side of the house. The number for the UAL side was closer to $700M. ( higher % on pay increase and a much higher pilot population). I believe this is the reason why so many are claiming that L-UAL pilots will vote for the money and look the other way on other sections of the TA. To which I say ***. SCOPE, SCOPE, SCOPE SCOPE SCOPE and more SCOPE.

Again rumors of a joint statement by both MC today regarding the TA.

Lets just wait and see....

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 10-20-2012 at 04:23 PM. Reason: TOS
LeeMat is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:53 AM
  #154  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,017
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Sometimes money is more important than days off. Money pays the bills, not time. I get 19 days off per month. The "normal worker" gets 8. I get bored and I need more money. Note: I do not get Jr. manned, do VJM, nor do I pick up open time with pilots on furlough. I have never come close to 100 hours.

My choice: good work rules, good pay, and have the days off to enjoy it. I don't think you should have to choose just one. I'd love to make more and fly less. If people want to work more, let them (if it doesn't take someone's job).

Otto,



You appear to contradict yourself. If people 'working more' does not take someones job then why should people on furlough affect your decision to pick up extra time?

In my opinion Pilots flying extra directly affects hiring. But the unfortunate fact is that we (all legacy airlines) are all becoming more efficient and flying more per pilot.

I agree with you about the importance of good work rules.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 12:29 PM
  #155  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 26
Default

I think the $400 MIL is just for the CAL side, yes that's right LAX LEC shot from the hip was not accurate according to our MEC Chairman as well.
I hope everyone with a vote uses thought before voting.
I too have inside information and $400 M is for the whole group not just CAL
Kayco is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 01:13 PM
  #156  
SLI best wishes!
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
Default

Originally Posted by Kayco
I too have inside information and $400 M is for the whole group not just CAL



Looks like mañana !


In This Update

· Joint Negotiating Committee


Joint Negotiating Committee Update

The JNC continues to work on language for the Tentative Agreement and will provide an update to the Pilots tomorrow.

Phil Otis
UAL-MEC Negotiating Committee
Dave Owens
CAL-MEC Negotiating Committee
LeeMat is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 01:36 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Otto,



You appear to contradict yourself. If people 'working more' does not take someones job then why should people on furlough affect your decision to pick up extra time?

In my opinion Pilots flying extra directly affects hiring. But the unfortunate fact is that we (all legacy airlines) are all becoming more efficient and flying more per pilot.

I agree with you about the importance of good work rules.

Scoop
Define "extra" time.
It's not a contradiciton. If people are on furlough = no extra flying. If no one is on furlough = fly whatever you want, no one is losing their job or prevented from coming back. At worst you might be preventing new hiring.
That's all I'm saying.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 03:28 PM
  #158  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

My money is on October 32~
horrido27 is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 04:41 PM
  #159  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by beeker
Its going to be oct 31
Considering the way this whole gong-show has transpired up to this point, why NOT October 31st??

At the least, it would be that of being apropos with the entire process.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 10-19-2012, 04:59 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by LeeMat
That is what I was told also. The CAL Lax rep numbers were correct and JP statement also says the numbers leaked are accurate with reference to the CAL side of the house. The number for the UAL side was closer to $700M. ( higher % on pay increase and a much higher pilot population). I believe this is the reason why so many are claiming that L-UAL pilots will vote for the money and look the other way on other sections of the TA. To which I say ***. SCOPE, SCOPE, SCOPE SCOPE SCOPE and more SCOPE.

Again rumors of a joint statement by both MC today regarding the TA.

Lets just wait and see....
You seem to provide solid info from time to time so I gotta ask: Where did the $700M figure come from??? I read JP's letter and $700M wasn't anywhere in that letter. Thanks in advance for your reply

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 10-20-2012 at 04:24 PM. Reason: TOS in Quote
krudawg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jabroni45
Cargo
143
05-10-2017 03:03 PM
TheFly
Major
214
09-23-2011 12:44 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 09:31 PM
VQ2 Spanky
Major
21
01-28-2008 09:58 PM
PIN727
Corporate
2
02-13-2007 06:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices