Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Possible T/A for MEC Review?? >

Possible T/A for MEC Review??

Search

Notices

Possible T/A for MEC Review??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2012, 08:44 PM
  #181  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Actually the SWA pilots scope is the ONLY iron clad SCOPE.

So far.......
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 12:58 AM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal
The only scope language out there that is "iron-clad" is legacy CAL.

It's been pushed, poked, and proded and Jeffey's legal dream team have not found a way in.
Except for the word "jets." If it had said "aircraft" instead it would have been perfect. Props. Who would of thought they would go get 70-seat props.
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 04:55 AM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

The problem is scope cannot be defended if the company wants it bad enough. Well, it can, but the way the Railroad Labor Act is set up, the company can just stop negotiating in good faith. You don't give up scope, you don't get a new contract. This can last decades. You can't strike. Your hands are tied.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 05:25 AM
  #184  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Actually the SWA pilots scope is the ONLY iron clad SCOPE.
No. They don't. They just haven't had scope limits tested. It's pretty easy to hold the line when no one tries to move it.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 05:46 AM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Otto and all you tough talking CAL pilots, I believe your iron clad scope is dead even without a new contract. This has been on other threads in the past so please check it out and quit thumping your chests.

Ultimately if the money gurus want to kill scope they will. This isn't about what's best it's about money. Why do you think People distress was started? Certainly not to provide a unique and better way for the public to travel by air. These boys made a killing on stock and financing and where is People today? Sold!

They want a outsourcing, their going to get it and the union's job should be to get a piece of the action that benefits whom they represent. Or at least make it very expensive to do so.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 07:11 AM
  #186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Except for the word "jets." If it had said "aircraft" instead it would have been perfect. Props. Who would of thought they would go get 70-seat props.
We used to fly the ATR 72 at Cont. Express. No biggie actually.
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 07:20 AM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
These boys made a killing on stock and financing and where is People today? Sold!

They want a outsourcing, their going to get it and the union's job should be to get a piece of the action that benefits whom they represent. Or at least make it very expensive to do so.
Pretty soon we'll be sold too.....we're too big to fail? HA.

This thing might get cut up too.

Our managers have one thing in common...."they don't want to run an airline, they want to manage a network."

Without global airline seniority, or national seniority, the scoped out, farmed out, out-sourced model you so badly want to get a piece of will mean that every 5 to 12 years we get the pleasure of starting over at the bottom of someone's list.

Great, we get a piece of the pie.... The pilots piece usually consists of crumbs, and the icing on the cake is very short lived indeed. We'll get a warm fuzzy for about 18 months, then once the shine wears off, and the boys in the executive washroom make another killing off the stock and off our backs, and we'll be wondering why in the heck are they so giddy up there on the 60th floor. Oh, they found another way in to outsource some more jobs.

Unless you're in the top one third of the seniority list, you probably need to really read that scope language pretty good.

The union has historically gotten a piece of the action, the problem is, I have not.

Chest thumping..............I think not. Cuatious, guarded, and slightly pessimistic....YES. I don't trust the company, but I don't trust the regional airline pilots association too much these days either.

ALPA has a conflict of interest: Protect the pilots at the regionals at the expense of mainline, or protect mainline pilots at at the expnse of the regionals who continually get bigger and faster jets.

I wonder what truly is the limit on the size of an "RJ." Is there a limit?? Riddle me that, and get all of the regional carriers to agree to said limit, and I might feel cautiously optimistic.
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:05 AM
  #188  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

I asked this question before and no one speculated on it, so I will try again. How do you think you will put the scope genie back in the bottle on the UAL side? If CAL has the better scope, that means that UAL's is lacking and "weaker" How are you going to fix that discrepancy?
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:10 AM
  #189  
I love my job!
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: B757 Capt
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
Otto and all you tough talking CAL pilots, I believe your iron clad scope is dead even without a new contract. This has been on other threads in the past so please check it out and quit thumping your chests.

Ultimately if the money gurus want to kill scope they will. This isn't about what's best it's about money. Why do you think People distress was started? Certainly not to provide a unique and better way for the public to travel by air. These boys made a killing on stock and financing and where is People today? Sold!

They want a outsourcing, their going to get it and the union's job should be to get a piece of the action that benefits whom they represent. Or at least make it very expensive to do so.
Not quite correct. People Express was started by Don Burr (and others) in 1983 when he resigned from Texas International. Don was inspired by Freddie Laker's Laker Airways and hoped to build a US version of the same. It had nothing to do with SCOPE. Along the way they purchased Frontier, Britt and PBA. Due to failed integration of the aforementioned airlines, enormous debt incurred and the 1987 stock market crash they had no choice but to liquidate or sell. They sold out to Texas Air, the parent company of Continental and were eventually merged into that operation. L-CAL still has former Frontier, Britt and PBA pilots on its seniority list.
Boneman is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:12 AM
  #190  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I asked this question before and no one speculated on it, so I will try again. How do you think you will put the scope genie back in the bottle on the UAL side? If CAL has the better scope, that means that UAL's is lacking and "weaker" How are you going to fix that discrepancy?
Sit tight, we'll soon see...
Monkeyfly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
03-15-2012 12:26 PM
jess
Cargo
10
02-22-2011 09:00 PM
Flight84
Regional
109
03-17-2008 05:23 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
12
06-26-2006 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices