Search

Notices

Delta TA yes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2012, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

.....+1.....looking for a happy place. Can't find one on the T/A.
chuck416 is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 02:34 PM
  #12  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
Yes Bill, We could just roll over and give in to outsourcing...OR...WE can try to fight it. Obviously DALPA wasn't up for the fight. Somebody needs to make a stand. May as well be us...my double-breasted friend.
^^^^^ +1 ^^^^^

Hear that loud & clear. The fights on...been on...and will continue to be on till the UNITED-JCBA gets inked. Speaking strictly on our JCBA concerns...I am a firm believer that SCOPE (on ALL FRONTs) is the paramount, if not, the prime focus as a major cornerstone in any agreement produced.

No other present day Legacy can honestly say they've felt the direct scorn as a result of, "lack of SCOPE", than our combine Pilot Group.....Hands down, numbers talk, and that's a fact.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 04:23 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Now is not the time to be a bunch of pillow biters and accept the belief that all contracts need be the same. If dal wants to outsource more 70 flying then let them have it. United pilots need to fly these planes.

What would have happened in 1985 if we had said the B scale was the industry standard and we must go along. This debacle has to got to stop and I for one am sick and damn tired of kneeling.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 04:34 PM
  #14  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

^^Amen, brother.

Count me in the category of "Skeptical" of DAL's TA. Not sure if it is good or bad, but when a pilot group is this vehemently divided over it, I see it as having major holes; exploitable by corporate robber-barrons.

Show me a UCH TA where the pilot group overwhelmingly says "YES!," and I'll be happy.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 04:39 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Default

UNNNNbelievable

Whatever you do, no matter how deep you have to dig, don't let Stepford Airlines set the standard.
Outsider is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 05:16 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Bill lumberg can't be a delta pilot. He must work for Ford, Harrison douchebag union/pilot busting law firm.
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 05:44 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

You might be tempted to just dismiss this as yet another sarcastic post here from the jaded Bligh, but I just had a moment of clarity, a true enlightenment even call it an elucidation. Like that finger of God touching humanity captured by Michelangelo in his "The Creation of Adam" fresco of the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, or that white light flashing nano second of time when your heart stops during a sneeze, "Why didn't I think of this before?"

If we sign a deal with no/few work rules and low enough pay rates maybe UCH can sell itself to DAL as the number one choice of outsource partners?!!!!! THAT WAY THEY DON'T HAVE TO MANAGE ANYTHING!!!

We can then get all of the furloughed people back on the property ASAP and fight over SLI and more important things like the value of years of service vs. career expectation. This is so brilliant!

Now for the serious part: FUPM and release me. Quite sure I'll be joining the 38% of DAL pilots that voted "NO" once UCH presents their "straddle offer".
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 06:38 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

This has got to get Wall Street's attention. Delta merged less than four years ago and is on their second post-merger contract, this one six months before the amenable date. UAL is now in third year post merger and is 3 1/2 and 2 1/2 years past the pilot amenable dates with zero pilot contracts and getting media exposure that talks about a strike and worst US airline.
APC225 is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 07:11 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
SoCentralRain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 94
Default

IAH to Grand Junction? If no 50 seaters left, the route goes away and Grand Junction loses air service--just like a slew of small to medium sized communities with 50 seat airline "service". That's deregulation.
SoCentralRain is offline  
Old 06-29-2012, 07:44 PM
  #20  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Now is not the time to be a bunch of pillow biters and accept the belief that all contracts need be the same. If dal wants to outsource more 70 flying then let them have it. United pilots need to fly these planes.
Let's be clear "father".....That "other" recently ratified CBA allowed increased "76 seaters", AKA 90 seaters config'ed into 76 seats (like SkyWest's 70's config'ed into 66 seats with multi-class seating). "They" increased the numbers on larger RJ's hulls which are larger than both of the current L-UA/L-CO SCOPE provisions....a "bar" that we certainly don't want to meet. The only welcomed BAR is that of "small" outsourcing, tall coin, and cold beer.

There are the "Bill Lumberg's" of the world who say that CAL's SCOPE is porous in allowing >70 seats by way of the Colgan (soon to be Repubilic) TP's. His only argument is that the 737-500 flying outta EWR has been "hit". He fails to mention that the -500 fleet still remains at 20+, and it's ratio of decline in fleet wide numbers compared to that of reductions during the Q-400 tenure is NO WHERE in the area code of his argument/claims/dooms day hyperboles.

Either way "Father", your correct in saying just b/c another Legacy chooses to usher in a CBA allowing an increase in outsourced >70 seat flying (smoke-n-mirrors with caps/ratios), we sure as heck don't need to bow in doing the same. If Jeff & Fred want those RJ types/numbers, have at it, but mainline pilots fly the metal.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 10:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices