Search

Notices

Joint MEC Message

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2012, 01:22 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
If someone wants to put a gun to my head to accept a 32% pay raise, they are more than welcome to.

Meanwhile, you guys keep the chest thumping going; the Delta MEC is going to continue its work to restore the pay and working conditions of the industry.
I'm trying to see what you bring to the table to help the UAL/CAL pilots - I don't see anything. You walked into a good contract because your management wanted to make it work - not because LM did some fancy bargaining. I don't think he offered up the NWA pilots, but he didn't get in the way to protect their rights either. The NWA pilots had a gun to their heads and will never be your friend - they'll tolerate you though.

Believe it or not but the only thing the Delta pilot have on the UAL pilot is pay. We still beat you hands-down on working conditions. I believe your work rules may even be worst than CAL's, but we are going to fix CAL's and the pay issues as well.

LM is not the wizard you make him out to be. Have you noticed how the PAC funds have been decreasing since he took office. Your efforts to decertify ALPA may be wasted as LM is NOT doing a good job of representing the profession and is helping it die a slow death. We are 2 years into this and you think it's "chest thumping" that's delaying the process - enjoy your pat raise!
Once United is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 03:19 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
I'm sure you've heard the old adage:

"Every management gets the union they deserve"

The inverse is true as well.
Hey Piña;

I'm not sure if by saying "the inverse is true", you mean to imply that tough unionism makes management respond in kind (get stingy, use aggressive junior man tactics to staff every weekend, decrease pay and whittle away at work rules) or not, but if that is what you meant I have to take issue based on personal experience. Combative unionism at either L-CAL or L-UAL factored in little and contributed nothing in the way of molding the current managerial philosophy. Maybe you can explain what you meant a little more?
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:01 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Yeah it's step for sure. But what are we going to do not if, but when the magical deadline comes and goes?

Send another strongly worded letter to management?

We are squandering our summer opportunity here.
If they're not making REAL progress on the contract, it will be obvious WELL BEFORE the 15 Jun deadline. THAT is when we press forward with (HOPEFULLY), or without, the CAL leadership. At that point, nobody will be able to claim ignorance, unfairness, surprise, or any other bs excuse.

I think this is playing out just fine for now.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:16 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
Once United:

Your posts are starting to look like that Neil Swindells guy over at the private blog. If you are you're one of those guys who is never pleased and the cup is never even half full.

Please treat othesr in the sand box a little better.
There's no way this is NS... The posts are too short and he never says "you can't make this stuff up'.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:19 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
If someone wants to put a gun to my head to accept a 32% pay raise, they are more than welcome to.

Meanwhile, you guys keep the chest thumping going; the Delta MEC is going to continue its work to restore the pay and working conditions of the industry.
Thanks for the huge thread drift. So far, LM has been a worthless a$$clown as far as I'm concerned.

Just make sure you don't sell out more scope on you're way to restoring the pay and working conditions of the industry.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:09 PM
  #66  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Thanks for the huge thread drift. So far, LM has been a worthless a$$clown as far as I'm concerned.

Just make sure you don't sell out more scope on you're way to restoring the pay and working conditions of the industry.
We were kind of hoping you guys would put another rung in the ladder to help us with the climb.........
johnso29 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:53 PM
  #67  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
We were kind of hoping you guys would put another rung in the ladder to help us with the climb.........
Hey Delta brothers, do you know what FLIBS means?

I thought the CAL guys were exaggerating when they warned us...sadly, they were not.
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:29 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Baron50
You got me, I guess old people tend to repeat themselves, thanks for bringing it up though, so... let me pontificate. Most of what is happening today is reminiscent of 1985. We had the same type of naysayers then and they made a strong case not to strike. They whined, that the pilots were not ready, we could not win with a Repub President, we would be replaced like the CAL pilots and the controllers, we would kill the golden goose, the 570 was just waiting to take our jobs and unions were obsolete.

I guess judging how we did in "85" is a matter of perspective. Given that in "83" we were drinking gin with Ferris under the wing of the spruce goose and we had just given him our work rules with the blue Sky's contract, it was remarkable that we convinced the pilots to turn on mother United. To take a pilot group out on strike in that environment and bring them back without losing a single job, was, for me anyway, a measure of success. No one believed we would do it, few thought we would be successful. When it was over, United pilots had unity and the respect of our peers. We also demonstrated that if we did it once, we could do it again.

Don't get me wrong, no one wants a strike, it is a failure of negotiations and rarely does it result an economic benefit for either party. Nevertheless, unless management is convinced that a union will stop their revenue stream, they are unlikely to give you spit. That fact has not changed since the industrial revolution of the 19th century, much less then since 1985.

Unity is not just an empty word, tell a manager "you don't care what the issues are, you will do what the union tells you." That drives them absolutely freaking nuts. However, privately, knowing who in your leadership works for you and who works for them is equally important.

Now, aren't you glad that you asked grandpa "hows the weather?"

Baron50
Well Baron like I said before I like that the mec's are at least sounding like they might work together as this is the only was we will have success, especially if we start talking a srike. If it would be one side it would not last 3 days.

Back to 1985 since you live in the past and always slapping yourself on the back on how great that was.

I do agree it was amazing that alpa did get us to go on strike considering all that was going on in the industry and all that was as stake, for that I commend them. It stops pretty quick after that however.

I felt like there was nothing won, please don't keep telling me how no pilots lost there job. We had jobs to begin with to not lose a job to me is not a success. We basically had the same contract offered prior to the strike that we settled on. By the way in case you forgot we also went back to work without some pilots. If you remember we left them to the court system. That was after the famous we won't go back without you comments. What our union meant to say was we won't go back without you unless it gets tough. It took some many months to get back on the property and many years to have seniority restored.

Since you brought up that group, 570, please remember we had some cross from that group also and yes more than the 4 the union always mentions. We also had quite a few from that group work both sides of the fence during the strike, something else that was not supposed to happen. I am not talking about dumpster work I am talking about agree to go to work and then using some lame excuse to delay, not something that was supposed to take place.

Then we had another group in training, the 539 and yes they were there to replace all the pilots. As it turned out they were put in front of only one group as replacments and yes they ended up being union members. Remember alpa talking about who would be considered a sc-- and how it kept changing? If you go to training was then if you complete training and then if you turn a wheeel and then if you turn a wheel after ioe, yea great if you were a sleez bag trying to climb over you fellow pilots.

We also even allowed brown suiters and fleet qual back into the union.

I felt the strike ended as the amnount of brown suiters that were pushing to go back and alpa realizing it would collapse. Nice unity.

As I look around the property and listen I see even less unity at this point and many more "groups" Can they get pulled together, maybe, but not without bot mec working together.

One last comment on unity. When I see some dal folks showing up in this discussion. I am confident that they will bring all of us boxes of donuts if we walk just like 1985. Yes that same unity that was tripping over themselves in the hopes that we never came out of bankruptcy. Oh yea unity, this is some "union" I don't know if you have ever belonged to another union or not but this one always feels more like a country club.
syd111 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 07:40 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
We were kind of hoping you guys would put another rung in the ladder to help us with the climb.........
I was (and still AM) hoping the same thing! Unfortunately we're stuck with ANOTHER group of sr managers who are determined to save a buck off the backs of the employees instead of making WAY more money the hard way Sometimes I think we're actually cursed by the natural strength of our route structure and customer base. If these guys actually HAD to do a good job to make a profit I bet things would be different.

We shall see how this will go.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:19 AM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Default

"but we are going to fix CAL's and the pay issues as well." Fix yous scope first. I would take CAL s pay and work rules over UALs work rules and SCOPE or lack of any day of the week.
756driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redeye Pilot
United
112
11-07-2010 02:31 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
94
10-18-2010 09:08 PM
skypest
United
0
10-01-2010 09:50 AM
Sir James
Major
0
10-06-2005 03:42 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 09:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices