Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Release formally requested >

Release formally requested

Search

Notices

Release formally requested

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2012, 06:59 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
So JP and JH met? That's what the WSJ is saying Pierce stated.?

And why the change of mind from some people here? When JP asked for the Profit Sharing, he was doing the right thing for the CAL pilots. But now when JH does something for the UAL pilots, he's wrong?

My source says next meeting is under the radar at the IFALPA conference.
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 07:15 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Slammer
Oh really...you obviously don't understand the history between the two groups. Of course, its not every pilot at UA...but Ask any pilot at CAL with sometime on the line and they will tell you, that has historically been the case....birth from 83 and 85 and continues today. Im being honest about the realities of bringing these two culturally different pilot group together. It started well before this merger and not going away because we are tired of hearing it...
Well, like it or not, we are stuck with each other. Time to put our "cultural differences" to bed fight for the collective group.

I am tired of hearing anything that prevents us from achieving a jcba. I will most definitely be tired of hearing it in the cockpit since it will only serve as a buzkill for my impending layover.

Some need to realize who the real enemy is.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:33 PM
  #43  
New Hire
 
Jetdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Originally Posted by REAL Pilot
Thats what I meant....
Let's Rock and Roll
Jetdawg is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:01 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 767 F/O
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by Jetdawg
Let's Rock and Roll
+1
I'm ready to walk. 10 years of bankruptcy wages has me really ****ed.
Pilotbiffster is offline  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:09 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 767 F/O
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal
OK.

I am really confused now.

1. Is Jay Happner asking for relase on behalf of the UAL pilots, or the CAL pilots, and/or both groups?

2. If he is asking for release of both groups of pilots, under what authority does he act?

3. Under the ALPA CBA, does another MEC MC have the authority to ask for such, and procedurally, how could the ALPA President honor such a request if the requester doesn't have legal authority to ask for it?

4. Did the CAL MEC vote on this as well?

5. Did the UAL MEC direct JH to do this, even though the CAL MEC may not have voted on it?

6. Have both MEC's voted to request that CA. Happner serve as the "joint spokesperson" on behalf of joint negotiations?

7. IF the ALPA President submits a request for relase of just the UAL pilots, where does that leave joint negotiations?
Doesn't really matter at this point, does it ? We either get released or we don't. If we don't, we spend another five years negotiating in "good faith" with co-worker Jeff. If we do, then you have a choice to make: scab or don't scab. Live with it.
Pilotbiffster is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 12:37 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
I think this WSJ writer is pretty clueless, and doing some pretty creative interpretation of what's actually known.

On top of that, she writes like a six year-old. When did WSJ start hiring functional illiterates?

T/W
Susan Carey from the WSJ?

Have you ever met her?

She's long been one of the best in the business.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 04:20 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster
Doesn't really matter at this point, does it ? We either get released or we don't. If we don't, we spend another five years negotiating in "good faith" with co-worker Jeff. If we do, then you have a choice to make: scab or don't scab. Live with it.
Unfortunately it really does matter.

In the past ALPA has done some good things and some pretty dumb things. The TWA DFR comes to mind. That might bankrupt ALPA.

The way the strike vote was handled at CAL in '83 was also procedurally flawed. While they were dealing with "co-worker Lorenzo" back then, not much has changed. No one likes the way the strike vote came down. While it was a job action and all that goes with it, it was ill-timed, and poorly planned.

I don't see Lee Moak, a very conservative, and non-confrontational ALPA President violating CBL just so we can "live with it." This would be the end of ALPA if he screws it up, and while TWA may bankrupt ALPA, a goof up here would drive it into the ground in less than 90 days.

Let's be careful what we "live with."

I am all for a release and the requisite job action, but that can only legally go one of three ways:

1. UAL gets released
2. CAL gets released
3. CAL/UAL both get released

Right now, Happner is only asking for HIS UAL pilots. If the UAL has a seperate section 6 process that was formally opened, then that is fine.

BTW, CAL MEC currently does have a seperate and legally binding section 6 position with the NMB and has since 2008. Not sure if UAL does.

We can do it jointly or alone, but it would be better if both MEC's get on the same page and pretty quick.
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 05:01 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
uaav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 374
Default

Let's do this UCAL pilots!!! OUR profession has been dragged through the mud for way too long. Now is OUR chance to improve the lives of ALL UAL/CAL pilots and their families and make our profession one we are proud of once again. UCH is the largest airline in the world. Your CEO is compensated as such. NOW it's YOUR turn!

Last edited by uaav8r; 05-01-2012 at 05:46 AM.
uaav8r is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:07 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IADBLRJ41's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: 756 FO
Posts: 319
Default

I think it is a great move by the UAL MEC. Each pilot group has to take the information they have in-front of them and make decisions that will set a course for success. In this case United management continues to take advantage of a concessionary contract. The UAL pilots have had enough... How much longer should they have to wait it has been 10 yrs!

If the UAL ALPA pilots are successful this will set a mark in the industry that shopping for profits from pilots W2 is not acceptable. The message will be sent industry wide that the concessions are old news and we aren't going to take it.

I will gladly join the UAL pilots at my nearby airport and walk the line.
IADBLRJ41 is offline  
Old 05-01-2012, 06:59 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 644
Default

Let's keep our eye on the ball people.
A320 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APC225
United
70
04-26-2012 01:43 PM
trigg41
Cargo
7
10-07-2011 03:20 AM
SilkySmooth
Regional
18
09-17-2009 04:44 AM
caddis
Mergers and Acquisitions
85
12-08-2008 07:26 PM
JayDee
Major
2
04-11-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices