L-ual iah 75/76
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
[QUOTE=jsled;1169600]
+1
You mean like Delta did? Delta approached the pilot's MECs before the merger was even announced. Gave equity and raises before the SOC, and long before they mixed any metal. UAL had the benefit of going third. They saw the US AIr model, and the DAL way. We now know which way they chose. You are awfully trusting for a guy who has been kicked to the curb TWICE. Even if your right, they are still screwing us with every passing day. $137 for an Bus Captain??? SWA F/Os make more than that.
F em. I have turned into one POS employee, I can tell you that. And from what I am seeing on the line, it's a miracle were not back in court. UAL brought it on itself.
Sled
F em. I have turned into one POS employee, I can tell you that. And from what I am seeing on the line, it's a miracle were not back in court. UAL brought it on itself.
Sled
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,597
[QUOTE=jsled;1169600]
I'm pretty sure management would pursue the same route as Delta if we just asked for the contract that Delta got. Instead, we are asking for way more than Delta. What is managements motivation to sign a JCBA?
Delta + 1 and we could have a contract tomorrow.
You mean like Delta did? Delta approached the pilot's MECs before the merger was even announced. Gave equity and raises before the SOC, and long before they mixed any metal.
Delta + 1 and we could have a contract tomorrow.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
[QUOTE=iahflyr;1169669]
BS. the comprehensive proposal from the company, the so called DAL +1, is below DAL current rates AND it includes up to 250 95 seaters. It was/is a joke. In order for UCH to pursue the same route as DAL, they would of had to of approached us BEFORE the merger announcement. That did not happen. DAL also gave equity to the pilots BEFORE it hit the open market. That obviously did not happen here, either. SO, what was DAL's motivation to sign a JCBA and give pilots equity?? They saw value in having the pilots on board with the merger and were willing to pay for it. This management did/does not see value in having ALPA onboard. It's that simple.
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
http://www.unitednegotiations.com/em...y_10-27-10.pdf
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
http://www.unitednegotiations.com/em...y_10-27-10.pdf
Last edited by jsled; 04-15-2012 at 10:21 AM.
#15
[QUOTE=jsled;1169705]
BS. the comprehensive proposal from the company, the so called DAL +1, is 10+% below DAL current rates AND it includes up to 200+ 90 seaters. It was/is a joke. In order for UCH to pursue the same route as DAL, they would have had to approach us BEFORE the merger announcement. That did not happen. DAL also gave equity to the pilots BEFORE it hit the open market. That obviously did not happen here, either. SO, what was DAL's motivation to sign a JCBA and give pilots equity?? They saw value in having the pilots on board with the merger and were willing to pay for it. This management did/does not see value in having ALPA onboard. It's that simple.
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
I thought that in the DAL/NW merger they didn't have a "JCBA" but rather the DAL MEC worked out a side-deal LOA with Mgmt that basically forced the NWA guys to the table. And didn't the DAL guys get more "equity" in the deal than the NWA guys?
BS. the comprehensive proposal from the company, the so called DAL +1, is 10+% below DAL current rates AND it includes up to 200+ 90 seaters. It was/is a joke. In order for UCH to pursue the same route as DAL, they would have had to approach us BEFORE the merger announcement. That did not happen. DAL also gave equity to the pilots BEFORE it hit the open market. That obviously did not happen here, either. SO, what was DAL's motivation to sign a JCBA and give pilots equity?? They saw value in having the pilots on board with the merger and were willing to pay for it. This management did/does not see value in having ALPA onboard. It's that simple.
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
You mean like Delta did? Delta approached the pilot's MECs before the merger was even announced. Gave equity and raises before the SOC, and long before they mixed any metal. UAL had the benefit of going third. They saw the US AIr model, and the DAL way. We now know which way they chose. You are awfully trusting for a guy who has been kicked to the curb TWICE. Even if your right, they are still screwing us with every passing day. $137 for an Bus Captain??? SWA F/Os make more than that.
F em. I have turned into one POS employee, I can tell you that. And from what I am seeing on the line, it's a miracle were not back in court. UAL brought it on itself.
Sled
F em. I have turned into one POS employee, I can tell you that. And from what I am seeing on the line, it's a miracle were not back in court. UAL brought it on itself.
Sled
For DAL/NWA, it was essentially the DAL contract used with a few minor changes. Our JCBA is looking like every aspect of our contracts are being negotiated. It's a longer process but I expect it will result in a MUCH better outcome than simply updating either the UALALPA or the CALALPA contract.
Up until ~Feb this year, I was labeled a pessimist by stating that I didn't expect a TA prior to fall 2012. I still expect a TA by late fall 2012. Am I now being wildly optimistic?
Further, I don't expect TA1 to pass so we're likely not going to have a JCBA until early 2013.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Exactly. Our mechanics got 11.5K signing bonus, which according to some mechs I have spoken with was app. 80% retro. Lets say we get something similar on a 20% pay raise (to equal DAL + a little). For me, that is 50K straight retro, and 40K would be 80% of full retro. For 12000 pilots, that would be 480M just for the signing bonus. If the average salary is say 110K, then a 20% raise would cost 264M/yr. So, in the first year alone, a new contract would cost the company around 740M. Followed by 260M/yr plus raises. Are they expecting that kind of savings thru the "synergies" of flying each other's metal? So for those who ask "what is the company's motivation to sign a JCBA?" I say there is none. Not now, not when they are ready to mix crews, not ever. Not untill this place is in meltdown. US AIrways is doing just fine. In fact, I believe they set an all time company record for a quarterly profit last year.
SLed
SLed
#19
Originally Posted by jsled
Lets say we get something similar on a 20% pay raise (to equal DAL + a little).
Might be a 20% increase for you but equates out to around 1/2% for me. Shooting kind of low aren't you? Thanks but I'll pass.
#20
[QUOTE=jsled;1169705]
BS. the comprehensive proposal from the company, the so called DAL +1, is below DAL current rates AND it includes up to 250 95 seaters. It was/is a joke. In order for UCH to pursue the same route as DAL, they would of had to of approached us BEFORE the merger announcement. That did not happen. DAL also gave equity to the pilots BEFORE it hit the open market. That obviously did not happen here, either. SO, what was DAL's motivation to sign a JCBA and give pilots equity?? They saw value in having the pilots on board with the merger and were willing to pay for it. This management did/does not see value in having ALPA onboard. It's that simple.
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
http://www.unitednegotiations.com/em...y_10-27-10.pdf
You're absolutely right jsled and you've saved me the trouble of having to refute Tom or Jackson, whichever pens under the name "iahflyr". These are not the musings of a line pilot. TOTAL BS. Not even the scabs thought Delta plus a dollar would have really meant Delta plus a dollar.
BS. the comprehensive proposal from the company, the so called DAL +1, is below DAL current rates AND it includes up to 250 95 seaters. It was/is a joke. In order for UCH to pursue the same route as DAL, they would of had to of approached us BEFORE the merger announcement. That did not happen. DAL also gave equity to the pilots BEFORE it hit the open market. That obviously did not happen here, either. SO, what was DAL's motivation to sign a JCBA and give pilots equity?? They saw value in having the pilots on board with the merger and were willing to pay for it. This management did/does not see value in having ALPA onboard. It's that simple.
I hope somebody turned the APU off before the next morning from my last go-dark Den termination flight. It had been on since TPA.
http://www.unitednegotiations.com/em...y_10-27-10.pdf
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM