Search

Notices

Howgozit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2012, 10:33 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by 13n144e
Exactly. My comments on "new hires" were only in response to a suggestion that CAL pilots needed returning furloughees to "educate" us on getting a real contract. We don't need "educating" from furloughees or anyone else. We're keenly aware our work rules suck. We're also aware L-UAL's scope sucks. Collectively we need to change these things, but of course my comments emphasizing this were ignored and, instead the last two pages pages of this thread focused indignation on some non-existent, perceived slight against furloughees and sparked more spectacularly stupid debate on whose airline sucks the least. Face it folks, we both suck. Neither pilot group should feel anything but a sense of collective shame for allowing the state of our careers to sink so low. Certainly, no one here has anything to brag about. Not having personally experienced UAL history, I wouldn't dream of "educating" a UAL pilot on unionism. As a CAL pilot, I certainly don't expect, or accept it from UAL.
Well said. I think your original post merely struck a nerve with some reading some type of perceived superiority relative to the CAL "newhires". I would hope that UAL and CAL pilots would be receptive to the opinions each has on any given subject. Neither side has ownership of a position to "educate" IMO. Each group has a different history that in the end will hopefully lead to learning from the combined past mistakes. In the end game, one can only hope that the degree of how bad it sucks on both sides will be greatly reduced for the combined group under the JCBA.

Currently there are provisions in both contracts which are better than their counterpart. With any luck, the final product (whenever that comes) will be something all can find value in and see as an improvement for all pilots.

The sad reality is that before you can effectively negotiate with the company (assuming they are sincerely negotiating) you must first come to a negotiated position between the two MECs on all issues to make a proposal to the company as well as responding to any counter offers. There obviously has to be some give and take in that evolution between the groups.

Not an easy process for sure.

Frats,
Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 11:44 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by 13n144e
Certainly, no one here has anything to brag about. Not having personally experienced UAL history, I wouldn't dream of "educating" a UAL pilot on unionism. As a CAL pilot, I certainly don't expect, or accept it from UAL.
I never said anything about unionism education. In the simplest terms, I suggested CAL pilots could glean some information about what UAL had in their pre bankruptcy contract. Scope is easy, it's the other nuances in the contract I was referring to. If CAL wants to share what they had in their pre bankruptcy 1 contract, or even some gems in their current agreement, I would love to hear some ideas.

Yes, both of our contracts are in currently in the gutter. Information is key if/when we are presented with a TA. Will we be presented with a TA or sold a TA?

Imo, we should not be presented a contract that will pass 50+1. 50+1 will sow a path of future division. One element preventing that is to know where we have been so we know where we are going.

Last edited by SpecialTracking; 04-15-2012 at 12:01 PM. Reason: added txt
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 12:06 PM
  #43  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Once United
Hope you are not offended but I don't think a UAL guy working at CAL would accept dinner or a beer from you had they read any of your post.
I'm sure they watch you like a hawk after listening to a couple of your stories though.

Whatever.............. if they're that into themselves they can buy their own fricking dinner, I could really care less. So much for trying to "welcome the other guys". I guess they don't watch me too close though as I've bought a few already. Probably quite a big surprise to someone as superior as yourself. About the only stories they talk about is how their fellow pilots and company SOLD THEM OUT.............
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 12:11 PM
  #44  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster
............. Go back to your helicopters , this job is for real aviators ............
I'll test my "helicopter skills" against your fixed wing skills any day and leave you in the dirt.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 12:36 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: B777 CA - SFO
Posts: 730
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
I never said anything about unionism education. In the simplest terms, I suggested CAL pilots could glean some information about what UAL had in their pre bankruptcy contract. Scope is easy, it's the other nuances in the contract I was referring to. If CAL wants to share what they had in their pre bankruptcy 1 contract, or even some gems in their current agreement, I would love to hear some ideas.

Yes, both of our contracts are in currently in the gutter. Information is key if/when we are presented with a TA. Will we be presented with a TA or sold a TA?

Imo, we should not be presented a contract that will pass 50+1. 50+1 will sow a path of future division. One element preventing that is to know where we have been so we know where we are going.
Good post, Father. I have had these very discussions with the UA brethern I have flown with. There is no way that this deal is gonna get un***ked, so I would rather go forward armed with the best knowledge on what mistakes were made in the past and how to prevent them in the future. That can only be done by soliciting from and sharing information with my brothers in blue. I have gotten over the arbitrary territorial "who is bringing what" to the table and rather focusing on what we need put on the joint table going forward.
Lerxst is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 01:01 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
Welcome aboard Andy. Where are you going to be based and on what equipment? Hope you have good experiences here...............and yes, we're ALL in this crappy contract together! Hopefully something GOOD will come out of it soon. Dinner on me if we fly together!
I'll be IAH based, but I've got the feeling that doesn't mean much when they're short bodies.
I've had some very good conversations with my LCAL brothers, some over dinner.
Only one subject's off limits: SLI. None of us have control over SLI and discussing it is akin to discussing the existance of Israel between Christians and Muslims.

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
I spoke to a friend last night that was new to the CAL side. He was in the early January class and he lives close to EWR. He said last month was 113 credit hours. I didn't get the exact breakdown of how much was block time versus deadhead...but he said he was exhausted. If it wasn't for the fact that he didn't have to commute, he said he probably wouldn't have been able to take it. Things are only going to get worse over the summer.
That sounds about right. So far I haven't heard of any disciplinary action taken for refusing an assignment by stating you're fatigued. And it's much more common to state that you're fatigued than at LUAL.
Everyone coming to LCAL should expect to get run through the ringer while on reserve.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 01:47 PM
  #47  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I'll be IAH based, but I've got the feeling that doesn't mean much when they're short bodies.
I've had some very good conversations with my LCAL brothers, some over dinner.
Only one subject's off limits: SLI. None of us have control over SLI and discussing it is akin to discussing the existance of Israel between Christians and Muslims.



That sounds about right. So far I haven't heard of any disciplinary action taken for refusing an assignment by stating you're fatigued. And it's much more common to state that you're fatigued than at LUAL.
Everyone coming to LCAL should expect to get run through the ringer while on reserve.
Andy, the few UAL guys I've flown with have been IAH based, so I'm sure we'll cross paths sooner or later, especially with the "properly staffed" airline we're running.. As far as the SLI goes, I don't know enough about it and like it was in the military "it's way above my paygrade" is the only appropriate answer. I hope the CAL guys are treating you well, and dinner is still on me if we fly together. My best to you.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 01:51 PM
  #48  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
............ I have gotten over the arbitrary territorial "who is bringing what" to the table and rather focusing on what we need put on the joint table going forward.
As have most of us.............unfortunately a few are still bringing "baggage" to the table........................... It's certainly time to move along and get things in OUR court for a change.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 02:39 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
I hope the CAL guys are treating you well,
So far, everyone has been a class act. I've been passed a couple of stories from furloughees with a rare bad experience but I know that's happening on both sides of the fence. There will always be some that have a hard time dealing with their cheese being moved.

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
I spoke to a friend last night that was new to the CAL side. He was in the early January class and he lives close to EWR. He said last month was 113 credit hours. I didn't get the exact breakdown of how much was block time versus deadhead...but he said he was exhausted. If it wasn't for the fact that he didn't have to commute, he said he probably wouldn't have been able to take it. Things are only going to get worse over the summer.
Pilotgolfer, I did rough calculations on how many classes need to be below me before I can hold a line in IAH. My SWAG is 8 classes after me and I'll have enough people below me to hold a line. My understanding is that you can get a line faster in EWR.
Applying that information to your case, if you wait until ~4 months after being offered a class to come back, you should be able to hold a line after IOE.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-15-2012, 04:04 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
So far, everyone has been a class act. I've been passed a couple of stories from furloughees with a rare bad experience but I know that's happening on both sides of the fence. There will always be some that have a hard time dealing with their cheese being moved.



Pilotgolfer, I did rough calculations on how many classes need to be below me before I can hold a line in IAH. My SWAG is 8 classes after me and I'll have enough people below me to hold a line. My understanding is that you can get a line faster in EWR.
Applying that information to your case, if you wait until ~4 months after being offered a class to come back, you should be able to hold a line after IOE.

What size classes are you assuming? Do you think they will increase class size beyond the 4 pilot/class planned over the summer? I don't mind sucking it up for a few months so I don't run the risk of not being active when the contract is signed.

Also, I'm toward the bottom of the United batch so if CAL starts doing real new hires off the street, that would be better for me.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dba74
Foreign
83
07-07-2011 08:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices