Search

Notices

Howgozit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2012, 04:09 AM
  #91  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
I think what WE think doesn't matter and that you must be a real hoot to fly with. You're not being the devils advocate, you're just being a tool.
You might be surprised Ace! Seems that anyone that doesn't agree with the almighty UAL pilots is a tool. You guys really need to get over yourselves......
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:54 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

EBP,

Frendo, you've tossed more stink bombs than anyone else I can think of on this forum. So don't be surprised when someone calls you out on it.

Admit it, that was a stupid thing to say. Just like your other post about training ....

<<"And the new UAL way..............except that it costs us ANOTHER DAY OFF without PAY................. Yep, let's go "practice" our checkride and do it all again the next day! From everyone I've talked to, the "extra day" is a joke. Are the L-UAL pilots so "unprepared" that they need a warmup session? THAT is scary...............">>

Now that was a real team builder wasn't it? As if we have anything at all to do with LCAL training schedules (thank your UCAL management) and the CAL contract which allows you guys to work for free. Sounds like a problem with your contract, not the LUAL pilots.

Then there was the beauty about the UAL guys going after the CAL pilots on the PS debacle We filed a grievance against UCAL management, not CAL pilots. A grievance that will help all the UAL pilots in the long run. Over and over UAL guys posted that they were not against your getting PS, only the way it was done.

Have a swell day! "ACE". (There ya go again)
oldmako is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 05:58 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
Okay, I'll be the devil's advocate here. Suppose you were hired at CAL in 2005, have seven years of longevity at CAL, and now pilots who were hired at UAL in 99 or later and had only been on property two or three years before they were furloughed, were being told they would go in FRONT of you when you clearly have MORE years on property, what would you think? It's going to be interesting to say the least................

I guess I don't see where "more years on property" has to do with anything. I thought it was called a "seniority list" not a "longevity list".
aileronjam is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:24 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: B777 CA - SFO
Posts: 730
Default

Because ALPA merger policy is inclusive of longevity as one of its foundational pieces.
Lerxst is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:32 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
Because ALPA merger policy is inclusive of longevity as one of its foundational pieces.
Still doesn't explain how longevity affects seniority. They are two completely different things.
aileronjam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dba74
Foreign
83
07-07-2011 08:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices