CAL MEC pulls out of joint CAL/UAL MEC Meetin
#31
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 30
You've just illustrated my complaint. Jay can't sit on his kingdom and condescendingly say that we should let these trivial matters go and focus on the JCBA. When it was the CAL pilots who have an issue that needs resolving, it's apparently ok to 1) openly threaten to grind talks to a halt until the UAL pilots agree with the CAL pilots position on pay banding. 2) break out of TPA required tri-lateral talks to secure profit sharing for the CAL pilots. 3) file a grievance over 70 seaters in EWR and CLE. All of these things were outside the JCBA and Pearce felt needed attending to. I'm not arguing the fact that these things needed to be addressed (though I thought that the method of handling issues 1 and 2 were exceptionally poor). But now that the UAL pilots need to file a REACTIONARY grievance to deal with the fallout, Pearce is concerned about anything that might slow down a JCBA?? Come on. It's hypocritical, selfish, childish, condescending, and obnoxious. I too want nothing more than to get going on the JCBA, but if we need to defend our contract, we have the right to... just like the CAL pilots do. Pearce demands courtesy, and gives none.
I'm done with this conversation. I've had great experiences with the CAL pilots I've met. I really hope and believe we are all pulling on the same end of the rope for the same purpose. But Pearce needs to get some class. He's done more to set back the JCBA than I thought any one pilot could, so his crying about UAL pilots defending their contract due to HIS rogue actions doesn't hold much water with me.
I'm done with this conversation. I've had great experiences with the CAL pilots I've met. I really hope and believe we are all pulling on the same end of the rope for the same purpose. But Pearce needs to get some class. He's done more to set back the JCBA than I thought any one pilot could, so his crying about UAL pilots defending their contract due to HIS rogue actions doesn't hold much water with me.
#33
No parting shot and you missed the point. The grievance will be heard soon, on the expedited basis of the TPA. I would always expect that any MEC should grieve anything they have issues with. What I said was that I hope that once the grievance has a ruling, the pilots like you will be more concerned about the JCBA.
Meanwhile, if the account is true, your MEC has pulled out of a joint MEC meeting scheduled for this week. Let's see if that is the case, and how it plays out. If it is true then on the one hand we have a UAL MEC that did what it had to to fight for the interest of its pilots; and on the other hand we have a CAL MEC that decides to pout and pull out of a joint meeting.
Hopefully your MEC will get past this so we can get to a point where your MEC and pilots like you will be more concerned about the JCBA.
Here's hopin'.
Hog
Last edited by Groundhog; 03-11-2012 at 02:05 PM.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
I guess your being on the outside gives you the insight to come to this forum and tell any United Pilot what's going on. You must be a USAir winner. Give us a break!
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
#36
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 30
No, I didn't miss your point, but you obviously missed mine. You are implying that the UAL pilots are distracted by the grievances while they should be focused on the contract. Nothing could be further from the truth. Although for whatever reason you appear to want to push this version of the situation.
Meanwhile, if the account is true, your MEC has pulled out of a joint MEC meeting scheduled for this week. Let's see if that is the case, and how it plays out. If it is true then on the one hand we have a UAL MEC that did what it had to to fight for the interest of its pilots; and on the other hand we have a CAL MEC that decides to pout and pull out of a joint meeting.
Hopefully your MEC will get past this so we can get to a point where your MEC and pilots like you will be more concerned about the JCBA.
Here's hopin'.
Hog
Meanwhile, if the account is true, your MEC has pulled out of a joint MEC meeting scheduled for this week. Let's see if that is the case, and how it plays out. If it is true then on the one hand we have a UAL MEC that did what it had to to fight for the interest of its pilots; and on the other hand we have a CAL MEC that decides to pout and pull out of a joint meeting.
Hopefully your MEC will get past this so we can get to a point where your MEC and pilots like you will be more concerned about the JCBA.
Here's hopin'.
Hog
#38
EWR
"Now, if you have concerns about the way it was calculated under a merged profit sharing scenario in the combined company that is a different issue that needs to be taken up with management. If you feel your share of the profits should have been bigger that is a separate issue and is not really related to a particular work group but rather all work groups. "
You have accurately stated what the issue and the grievance is about.
It is sad to me that Pierce (and you possibly) would pull out and withdraw support of a grievance process which will in the end benefit ALL the pilots of United Airlines.
"Now, if you have concerns about the way it was calculated under a merged profit sharing scenario in the combined company that is a different issue that needs to be taken up with management. If you feel your share of the profits should have been bigger that is a separate issue and is not really related to a particular work group but rather all work groups. "
You have accurately stated what the issue and the grievance is about.
It is sad to me that Pierce (and you possibly) would pull out and withdraw support of a grievance process which will in the end benefit ALL the pilots of United Airlines.
For me, I was just tired of hearing comments that CAL pilots took money out of UAL pilots' pockets. One said to me that I and every other pilot in our group stole money that the UAL pilots worked hard to earn. It's not like this pilot group has been sitting back lounging around drinking lattes since the merger announcement, especially given the terrible work rules in the CAL contract.
#39
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
You've just illustrated my complaint. Jay can't sit on his kingdom and condescendingly say that we should let these trivial matters go and focus on the JCBA. When it was the CAL pilots who have an issue that needs resolving, it's apparently ok to 1) openly threaten to grind talks to a halt until the UAL pilots agree with the CAL pilots position on pay banding. 2) break out of TPA required tri-lateral talks to secure profit sharing for the CAL pilots. 3) file a grievance over 70 seaters in EWR and CLE. All of these things were outside the JCBA and Pearce felt needed attending to. I'm not arguing the fact that these things needed to be addressed (though I thought that the method of handling issues 1 and 2 were exceptionally poor). But now that the UAL pilots need to file a REACTIONARY grievance to deal with the fallout, Pearce is concerned about anything that might slow down a JCBA?? Come on. It's hypocritical, selfish, childish, condescending, and obnoxious. I too want nothing more than to get going on the JCBA, but if we need to defend our contract, we have the right to... just like the CAL pilots do. Pearce demands courtesy, and gives none.
I'm done with this conversation. I've had great experiences with the CAL pilots I've met. I really hope and believe we are all pulling on the same end of the rope for the same purpose. But Pearce needs to get some class. He's done more to set back the JCBA than I thought any one pilot could, so his crying about UAL pilots defending their contract due to HIS rogue actions doesn't hold much water with me.
I'm done with this conversation. I've had great experiences with the CAL pilots I've met. I really hope and believe we are all pulling on the same end of the rope for the same purpose. But Pearce needs to get some class. He's done more to set back the JCBA than I thought any one pilot could, so his crying about UAL pilots defending their contract due to HIS rogue actions doesn't hold much water with me.
That is not going to happen. The Sugarland Magazine article about J.P. pretty much shows his arrogance.
First, he's pictured flying in the right seat. What kind of M.C. would do this?
Second, in one of the last paragraphs, he tells prospect airline pilots to not pursue the profession until he fixes it. YHGTBSM! This guy is delusional and is a total narcissist.
#40
SLI best wishes!
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
"But Pearce needs to get some class"
That is not going to happen. The Sugarland Magazine article about J.P. pretty much shows his arrogance.
First, he's pictured flying in the right seat. What kind of M.C. would do this?
Second, in one of the last paragraphs, he tells prospect airline pilots to not pursue the profession until he fixes it. YHGTBSM! This guy is delusional and is a total narcissist.
That is not going to happen. The Sugarland Magazine article about J.P. pretty much shows his arrogance.
First, he's pictured flying in the right seat. What kind of M.C. would do this?
Second, in one of the last paragraphs, he tells prospect airline pilots to not pursue the profession until he fixes it. YHGTBSM! This guy is delusional and is a total narcissist.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post