A Problem With 5% Profit Sharing
#51
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Dexim:
I'm a UAL pilot but and I want you to know you are losing all of us with your continued harping about the PS and JP. What's done is done and I, like many others, have spent my PS so let's just rejoice that the LCAL guys and gals got theirs.
Now as far as those who keep poking at scope. As far as I know the two Jays are well aware of the issues and I expect that any contract handed to us for ratification will include an acceptable scope clause. If it isn't vote no.
Finally:
I don't see either side having any advantage over the other. The only difficulty is the seniority. LCAL has relatively many more "less senior" pilots flying Capt and WB FOs and it is the way it is. There will be pain in the integration no two ways about it or around it.
What I am really glad bout is the uniform will be blue. Why? It doesn't show cat and dog hairs as easily as black.
I'm a UAL pilot but and I want you to know you are losing all of us with your continued harping about the PS and JP. What's done is done and I, like many others, have spent my PS so let's just rejoice that the LCAL guys and gals got theirs.
Now as far as those who keep poking at scope. As far as I know the two Jays are well aware of the issues and I expect that any contract handed to us for ratification will include an acceptable scope clause. If it isn't vote no.
Finally:
I don't see either side having any advantage over the other. The only difficulty is the seniority. LCAL has relatively many more "less senior" pilots flying Capt and WB FOs and it is the way it is. There will be pain in the integration no two ways about it or around it.
What I am really glad bout is the uniform will be blue. Why? It doesn't show cat and dog hairs as easily as black.
Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
F16:
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
#56
We all need toss our myopic ALPA influenced vision of what this profession and a well run company can pay.
#57
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Unqalified
Posts: 93
You've already subjugated 1437 and you aren't going to be happy until to add another 4800 to that list. Your arrogance is astounding. It's either bend to your will or suffer. This isn't a merger for you. It's personal. You want nothing more than to inflict the same pain, suffering, and general discontent you've had for the last 10+ years and you aren't going to stop until we are all just as miserable and pathetic as you are. This isn't about JP or PS or the CAL pilot group. You are just ****ed at the world and want to bring us all down with you. I actually feel sorry for you.
#58
and mesa sux.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Whoops..I think he chose wisely. The "It is was it is" nonchalant attitude in the SLI was why he predicted..correctly... you were senior.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post