Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Negotiated profit sharing 2011 >

Negotiated profit sharing 2011

Search

Notices

Negotiated profit sharing 2011

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2011, 09:51 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by dexim
I don't think that is the problem. You do realize what the L-CAL MEC did to the L-UAL MEC. It undermined all L-CAL and L-UAL pilots and now you want to talk about unity. The CAL MEC did this before and was forgiven. I don't have it in my heart to do again. Sorry!
So file a lawsuit and get more money for the UAL group! I will strongly support it. I hope you all can get a million dollars a year. It will give us something to negotiate with. I also am willing to negotiate with my feet. I fear many on both sides are not. In fact, I can't believe anybody came back after being furloughed twice. Why would you want to do a good job for a company that treats you like that. Same on the CAL side. If they treat you like crap, find something else or do something about it. On time percentage is great on both side BTW. Nice job guys.

BTW, Denver and Chicago domiciles would be horrible for my lifestyle. Many of us like living in the warm weather. Hub changing is only good for very few.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 09:56 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A320 CAP
Posts: 55
Default Domiciles?

So can anyone tell me the benefit of moving roughly 130 seat A320 away from ORD and DEN and then bringing 737s with about the same seats into ORD? How is THAT moving seats where they better serve our route structures?? Apples for apples in my book...or is there another sinister reason to void that aspect of the T&PA?

My theory....CAL wants UAL to go away and just take our cash as they were down to nothing in their accounts before the merger and UAL WAS rolling in dough. No JCBA and CAL management will furlough 1000 UALs and ten asks who's left if they like the co. proposed JCBA. We say no. They furlough 1000 more UALs and they ask again what we think of their proposals. We say no again, they furlough more, until finally what's left of UAL agrees to the crappy JCBA just to save their jobs....THEN we are one with over 3000 UALs gone. VICTORY!!! But for management and the CALs. My theory, my opinion. Hope I'm wrong. So goes the death of UAL. Memorial services by next December so keep your calendar cleared.

Last edited by BusJock; 12-31-2011 at 12:32 PM.
BusJock is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:17 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by BusJock
So can anyone tell me the benefit of moving roughly 130 seat A320 away from ORD and DEN and then bringing 373s with about the same seats into ORD? How is THAT moving seats where they better serve our route structures?? Apples for apples in my book...or is there another sinister reason to void that aspect of the T&PA?

My theory....CAL wants UAL to go away and just take our cash as they were down to nothing in their accounts before the merger and UAL WAS rolling in dough. No JCBA and CAL management will furlough 1000 UALs and ten asks who's left if they like the co. proposed JCBA. We say no. They furlough 1000 more UALs and they ask again what we think of their proposals. We say no again, they furlough more, until finally what's left of UAL agrees to the crappy JCBA just to save their jobs....THEN we are one with over 3000 UALs gone. VICTORY!!! But for management and the CALs. My theory, my opinion. Hope I'm wrong. So goes the death of UAL. Memorial services by next December so keep your calendar cleared.
If I were in mang. I would move the UAL routes to CAL hubs so I could then replace 70 seaters on the routes I wanted to instead of being hamstrung by 50 seat scope. I wish CAL mang had a great bond with us CAL pilots and we were out to take over the world and get rich together. Guess what....it's just management. The pilots aren't involved in the conspiracy.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:21 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

I do have a question. Does UAL have to pay to move all these people to their new hubs? If so, I would definitely make them move me. Then, I would move myself back and commute. Just sayin.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:39 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Busjock, the conjecture is that the cargo ability of the bus is more suited to south flying out of IAH.

On the second point one need look no further than free market principles to show that you are right on the money in your analysis. CAL is cheaper, no rigs, no soft time, etc. We're already seeing less productive flying migrate. Doesn't UAL contract require 16 hours no duty before a redeye? CAL does not, just FAR. Seems like a lot of redeyes are coming over too. We can fly west in a.m., redeye same p.m. Also check CLE MCO in April--two of four dailies are 319s.

I fear you are right in that they are going to move flying over until the 1500 UAL pilots are flying under CAL workrules, while getting CAL to capitulate on this and that until UAL is small or gone. It is a tragic turn of events for ALL pilots who were hoping this was our time to get out from under the boot.

Last edited by APC225; 12-31-2011 at 10:57 AM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:41 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
So file a lawsuit and get more money for the UAL group! I will strongly support it. I hope you all can get a million dollars a year. It will give us something to negotiate with. I also am willing to negotiate with my feet. I fear many on both sides are not. In fact, I can't believe anybody came back after being furloughed twice.
Our goal is not to negotiate a JCBA via side deals. How many side deals and years would it take to produce a JCBA? Does the NMB recognize this form of pattern bargaining? Would it produce an impasse? The status quo not only protects what little we have left, but it prevents the company from whipsawing.

I'm sure that most who are coming back are only doing so to better their financial state.

Go Heels!
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:58 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Our goal is not to negotiate a JCBA via side deals. How many side deals and years would it take to produce a JCBA? Does the NMB recognize this form of pattern bargaining? Would it produce an impasse? The status quo not only protects what little we have left, but it prevents the company from whipsawing.

I'm sure that most who are coming back are only doing so to better their financial state.

Go Heels!
I agree our goal is not to negotiate separate deals. But they are not playing fair. Neither should we. We could shut the place down in 5 minutes if we used their ethics and negotiating tactics.

So be willing to burn the mf down. Again, too many people think that they can't do anything else and make the kind of money. We are all college educated professionals. Act like it. I have 2 jobs just for this reason. It allows me always do the right thing and say up yours whenever I want.

They have a lot more to lose financially than you and I. We will have jobs in the future as airline flying is only increasing. Go Heels back at you!

Fraternally.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 11:58 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Default

[QUOTE=socalflyboy;1110014]Well, for one, I personally do not know ONE SINGLE cal pilot who is happy and "celebrating" this sorry a$$ one time check..secondly, why would you come on this board and "preach" unity, yet stir up more division.."salivating" at new domiciles? are you high? do you know how many people have moved to IAH for the long haul..to raise there kids and settle down..now to maybe have it reduced by 40%(as the rumor mill implies)?? and you think they are celebrating this notion..not trying to slam you, but it seams very ironic to state unity in the first title, then slam us in the remainder of the post...if you are gonna curse

Oh the "dummey" gets cursed plenty...especially by the 1437. He also did an end around to our JCBA. We can add Pierce to that list too.

And for the record, selling out the 737s was not for 70 seaters. It was to RIGHT SIZE for the stupid merger.

Unity? Hah! Its every man for himself now.
SOTeric is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 12:22 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,869
Default

The biggest nugget of all in my mind is that CAL pilots get the profit sharing with ANOTHER expiration date - we will be at it again "negotiating" profit sharing for 2012.

We play checkers and MGT plays chess.......
Shrek is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 01:46 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by BusJock
So can anyone tell me the benefit of moving roughly 130 seat A320 away from ORD and DEN and then bringing 737s with about the same seats into ORD? How is THAT moving seats where they better serve our route structures?? Apples for apples in my book...or is there another sinister reason to void that aspect of the T&PA?

My theory....CAL wants UAL to go away and just take our cash as they were down to nothing in their accounts before the merger and UAL WAS rolling in dough. No JCBA and CAL management will furlough 1000 UALs and ten asks who's left if they like the co. proposed JCBA. We say no. They furlough 1000 more UALs and they ask again what we think of their proposals. We say no again, they furlough more, until finally what's left of UAL agrees to the crappy JCBA just to save their jobs....THEN we are one with over 3000 UALs gone. VICTORY!!! But for management and the CALs. My theory, my opinion. Hope I'm wrong. So goes the death of UAL. Memorial services by next December so keep your calendar cleared.
Not a seat for seat swap. Majority of the 737s are 160+ seats up to 173 passenger 800/900 and (900 ER) Have a hand full of 500s and 700s that are 124 and 114 respectively. Good chance the 500s will be parked. Have heard the Airbus is better suited for cargo south of the border
Slammer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Major
1
10-27-2011 07:23 AM
windrider
Major
4
01-17-2011 01:18 PM
Indy
Money Talk
5
12-18-2010 06:32 PM
Sir James
Major
0
10-25-2005 11:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices