Negotiated profit sharing 2011
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Not a sell-out in my view. I was one of the folks that wanted to keep PS in the lockbox, but after reading the position report, it makes sense. A lucative win on the 767 sale was highly unlikely, given past and current arbitrator rulings so a known is better than an unknown . We won the 70 seat grievance but the reward was nothing and it took almost an entire year to resolve so the arbitraors precedence had been set. I believe the aspects of the terminable parts of TPA and future moves should be the greatest concern, not how CAL MEC decided for its pilots
It's not a lucrative settlement -- it's a blatant payoff to keep support among the CAL pilots. As long as you guys believe mgmt has ANY decent or honest intentions, you will be playing into their hands. You stated ALL the proof you need in your one paragraph! A 'highly unlikely' lucrative win, a slam dunk win on the blatant 70 seater scope violation that resulted in peanuts (and foot dragging non-compliance AFTER the award!), and the 'unknown' of how an arbitrator will rule all lead to the conclusion that the 'settlement' is out of all proportions to the risk the company faced.
You guys are being bought. Will you notice and react?
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 102
Who here is ready for vote of no confidence! ALPA is a dog and pony show plain and simple.
- ALPA against outsourcing: but wait... don't they represent those pilots flying (70-seats)???
- ALPA wins 70-seat scope: Oh wait, cannot get anyone to enforce it!
-ALPA sells 4800+ pilots out for what... 2% p/s???
-Jeff laughs all the way home...
Dont worry though...they get to keep there desk job for the next xx years (that we pay for) while they try to get a JCBA that can pass the mass vote. Mmm...sounds like a winner.
- ALPA against outsourcing: but wait... don't they represent those pilots flying (70-seats)???
- ALPA wins 70-seat scope: Oh wait, cannot get anyone to enforce it!
-ALPA sells 4800+ pilots out for what... 2% p/s???
-Jeff laughs all the way home...
Dont worry though...they get to keep there desk job for the next xx years (that we pay for) while they try to get a JCBA that can pass the mass vote. Mmm...sounds like a winner.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
Slammer,
It's not a lucrative settlement -- it's a blatant payoff to keep support among the CAL pilots. As long as you guys believe mgmt has ANY decent or honest intentions, you will be playing into their hands. You stated ALL the proof you need in your one paragraph! A 'highly unlikely' lucrative win, a slam dunk win on the blatant 70 seater scope violation that resulted in peanuts (and foot dragging non-compliance AFTER the award!), and the 'unknown' of how an arbitrator will rule all lead to the conclusion that the 'settlement' is out of all proportions to the risk the company faced.
You guys are being bought. Will you notice and react?
It's not a lucrative settlement -- it's a blatant payoff to keep support among the CAL pilots. As long as you guys believe mgmt has ANY decent or honest intentions, you will be playing into their hands. You stated ALL the proof you need in your one paragraph! A 'highly unlikely' lucrative win, a slam dunk win on the blatant 70 seater scope violation that resulted in peanuts (and foot dragging non-compliance AFTER the award!), and the 'unknown' of how an arbitrator will rule all lead to the conclusion that the 'settlement' is out of all proportions to the risk the company faced.
You guys are being bought. Will you notice and react?
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
Do you know the exact CAL language on 50+ jets? If so, you'd know the issue was CAL hub-to-hub and codes. It was never intended to prevent the company from flying 70 seaters under UAL code between hubs.
#18
At the moment of the TPA we were all at a neutral set point, UAL with theIr CBA and what they had negotiated together in the TPA, and CAL with our CBA and what we had negotiated together in the TPA.
CAL has just negotiated a side deal which unbalances the neutral set point. We got our pidly one-time $5,000. Now, I wish the UAL pilots the best of luck in getting their own side deal of CAL payrates, worth an average of $23,000/yr ongoing year after year unil the JCBA.
While UAL pilots are enjoying their $2,000/mo increase in pay, the CAL pilots will be in this exact same position next year, begging to not be the only ones left out of 2012 profit sharing, while UAL pilots enjoy not only their profit sharing, guaranteed and unending in their CBA, but ALSO their $23,000 pay raise this year and every year.
I want to make it clear that I'm not bitter in any way about belonging to such a pathetic pilot group. So dependable to always be on the bottom and, even now at the dawn of bright and hopeful 2012, ensuring that we will never rise above our meager and measly past.
CAL has just negotiated a side deal which unbalances the neutral set point. We got our pidly one-time $5,000. Now, I wish the UAL pilots the best of luck in getting their own side deal of CAL payrates, worth an average of $23,000/yr ongoing year after year unil the JCBA.
While UAL pilots are enjoying their $2,000/mo increase in pay, the CAL pilots will be in this exact same position next year, begging to not be the only ones left out of 2012 profit sharing, while UAL pilots enjoy not only their profit sharing, guaranteed and unending in their CBA, but ALSO their $23,000 pay raise this year and every year.
I want to make it clear that I'm not bitter in any way about belonging to such a pathetic pilot group. So dependable to always be on the bottom and, even now at the dawn of bright and hopeful 2012, ensuring that we will never rise above our meager and measly past.
Last edited by APC225; 12-30-2011 at 07:56 PM.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
That's my point. Don't believe the old saying "Never look a gift horse in the mouth"! You may not have put a price tag on yourself, but someone is getting ready to buy you. From the CAL pilot perspective, you should wonder WHY they're paying you money they don't have to pay you. From a UAL pilot perspective, I wonder what they expect to get from the CAL pilot group in return for this payment. The more wary side of me thinks that Pierce has already cut a deal in private. Your leadership has created the environment of distrust we are about to live in for the remainder of this merger. No offense to you personally, but I don't trust your leadership one IOTA at this point. They have chosen their (and your) position by their actions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post