Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility >

LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility

Search

Notices

LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2011, 07:43 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
I'd like to know, as well. According to the MIT Airline Data Project, UAL and CAL flight deck crew costs are equal on a per pilot basis.
They've got a lot of charts in there, but this is total cost per hour.

http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...0Summary10.htm

Are you looking at the cost per year chart? Because if you are that doesn't take into account hours flown. While it shows similar annual cost per pilot CAL pilots fly about 10% more hours for the same cost.

http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...Equivalent.htm

Last edited by APC225; 12-13-2011 at 08:53 AM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 08:10 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

I don't see how one can infer a 13% compensation gap based on those charts. There are so many variable that it would be hard to reach such a hard conclusion. Variables would include the ratio of narrowboday to small body flying, the amount of international flown, etc.
CALFO is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 08:20 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
I don't see how one can infer a 13% compensation gap based on those charts. There are so many variable that it would be hard to reach such a hard conclusion. Variables would include the ratio of narrowboday to small body flying, the amount of international flown, etc.
If by "compensation" you mean a paycheck, then you're right, you can't derive that from this chart. This includes "benefits" as well as pay. IOW it is total cost, pay, medical, retirement or 401k match, QOL work rules, etc. And you'd have to increase CAL's by 13% to match UAL's--on this chart anyway.

Regardless of a specific number I'm pretty confident CAL has the cheapest overall cost per pilot among the majors, and among many others as well. Management wants to continue this at CAL and bring UAL costs down to it, which is the fight we're in right now.

Last edited by APC225; 12-13-2011 at 08:53 AM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 08:29 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Daytripper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Capt. B737
Posts: 329
Default

No, not the majority. Didn't say majority, but I run across them. It dosen't take much.
It takes a majority to pass a turd of a contract. Smilton and other members in the puzzle palace are having a far worse impact on us than a few slick tie idjuts.
Daytripper is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 08:39 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Yes it has. UAL, BK. NWA, BK. DAL BK. All had pay, benefits and work rules taken away by corporate thieves and a judge. CAL, not BK. We gave it away, and far more than the others had taken away by force. In 2010 UAL pilots got 13% more in pay and benefits than CAL pilots. DAL pilots 22% more.

And back to the thread topic, they all have contractual profit sharing while we go begging for a piece of the pie--and give away what? in the process. They have better BK contracts than we've ever had outside of BK. We are "United" now. If there were ever a time for us to get off the mat it is now.

What exactly did CAL lose during both trips through bankruptcy? I am sure it was quite a bit.
A320 is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 09:28 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by APC225

Regardless of a specific number I'm pretty confident CAL has the cheapest overall cost per pilot among the majors, and among many others as well.
What is this confidence based upon?
CALFO is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 09:36 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Are you looking at the cost per year chart? Because if you are that doesn't take into account hours flown. While it shows similar annual cost per pilot CAL pilots fly about 10% more hours for the same cost.
I stand corrected. I wasn't taking into account block hours per pilot flown. The first chart doesn't mean much because it doesn't take into account augmented crew differences, but when you simply look at the differences in overall pilot costs and hours flown per pilot, you're right. Matters not, we're kind of like a couple of hookers arguing over who's the *****. The big picture is we're badly lagging the industry and need big improvements in the JCBA over either contract.
XHooker is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 09:38 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by A320
What exactly did CAL lose during both trips through bankruptcy? I am sure it was quite a bit.
Referencing Flying The Line II it looks like it was about 50 percent.
XHooker is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 10:13 AM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Daytripper
It takes a majority to pass a turd of a contract. Smilton and other members in the puzzle palace are having a far worse impact on us than a few slick tie idjuts.
Agree 110% that mgmt spends more time jerking our chain than running an Airline. That being said, just spoke to a guy today (very nice person) hired in '98. Reserve CA and just flew a FO trip for scheduling. We should not be doing this. I don't, and will not fly an FO trip when on reserve or anytime. It's dangerous to say the least.
MXDUDE is offline  
Old 12-13-2011, 03:13 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

He will probably beeyotch and moan about ALPAs inability to get him the contract he wants as well. Just looking at our performance numbers one can infer that the combined UCAL pilot group is either pretty happy or (sadly) has zero ambition and zero spine.

At this time management has minimal respect for us and is in no hurry to negotiate. If I were one of them, I'd be laughing at over Martinis and a Cohiba at Ruth Cris or Mortons.

Leverage pi$$ed away, one pilot and one trip at a time.

Last edited by oldmako; 12-14-2011 at 08:57 AM.
oldmako is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrvmo
Major
12
02-12-2008 05:55 PM
A320fumes
Major
1
02-25-2007 01:14 PM
AAflyer
Major
24
01-23-2007 12:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices