Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility >

LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility

Search

Notices

LCAL Profit Sharing 2011 Possibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2011, 07:16 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
hear! hear!

"Unfortunately, all four of these protections are subject to expiration on New Year’s Eve, either collectively or individually, for the United pilots."

What you guys are failing to realize is the above protections have a monetary value as does the LCAL PS plan. Why is it the UALMEC feels they deserve more compensation above the current T&PA? again a pure money grab by your MEC.

The LCAL PS is pathetic and provides a fraction of the dollars provided in the LUAL plan. I am glad you guys have PS in your contract but the CALMEC is not asking for your plan, but rather inclusion in the standard LCAL plan. Your protections are worth much more than the LCAL PS.
liquid is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 07:19 AM
  #112  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by liquid
"Unfortunately, all four of these protections are subject to expiration on New Year’s Eve, either collectively or individually, for the United pilots."

What you guys are failing to realize is the above protections have a monetary value as does the LCAL PS plan. Why is it the UALMEC feels they deserve more compensation above the current T&PA? again a pure money grab by your MEC.

The LCAL PS is pathetic and provides a fraction of the dollars provided in the LUAL plan. I am glad you guys have PS in your contract but the CALMEC is not asking for your plan, but rather inclusion in the standard LCAL plan. Your protections are worth much more than the LCAL PS.

Can you please provide the cost analysis of both please?
FACSofLife is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 07:22 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

I don't think the United pilots are worried about furloughs or base closures at this time.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 07:50 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by FACSofLife
Can you please provide the cost analysis of both please?
Nope sure can't, rest assured the company has it calculated down to the dollar. Remember CAL was run by an accountant and now a lawyer... It's ALL measured.

Why do you think negotiations have gone on so long? The company is ALWAYS calculating the cost. CAL pilot staffing is so thin because they know the exact cost of 1 additional pilot. They bank on the fact that someone will pickup that open time alleviating the need to have that pilot on the payroll. Less money in pilot payroll means MORE money in their bonus/paycheck.

What's the old saying "know your enemy"...
liquid is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 07:52 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
I don't think the United pilots are worried about furloughs or base closures at this time.

At this time... be careful with statements like that, jeffery IS the lorenzo of 2011
liquid is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:04 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by liquid
"Unfortunately, all four of these protections are subject to expiration on New Year’s Eve, either collectively or individually, for the United pilots."

What you guys are failing to realize is the above protections have a monetary value as does the LCAL PS plan. Why is it the UALMEC feels they deserve more compensation above the current T&PA? again a pure money grab by your MEC.

The LCAL PS is pathetic and provides a fraction of the dollars provided in the LUAL plan. I am glad you guys have PS in your contract but the CALMEC is not asking for your plan, but rather inclusion in the standard LCAL plan. Your protections are worth much more than the LCAL PS.
ahh. so you agree that if CALPA gets PS, UALPA should get some additional compensation as well, just not so much? THis is a negotiation. You don't start off with what you want, you go big and get what you can. If the company doesn't play ball, then we all keep the status quo. Ok by me.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:19 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by liquid
"Unfortunately, all four of these protections are subject to expiration on New Year’s Eve, either collectively or individually, for the United pilots."

What you guys are failing to realize is the above protections have a monetary value as does the LCAL PS plan. Why is it the UALMEC feels they deserve more compensation above the current T&PA? again a pure money grab by your MEC.

The LCAL PS is pathetic and provides a fraction of the dollars provided in the LUAL plan. I am glad you guys have PS in your contract but the CALMEC is not asking for your plan, but rather inclusion in the standard LCAL plan. Your protections are worth much more than the LCAL PS.
This slippery slope is exactly why we should just STICK TO OUR CONTRACTS. If co-worker Jeff wants something else, give us our OVERDUE JCBA!
SOTeric is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:32 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
ahh. so you agree that if CALPA gets PS, UALPA should get some additional compensation as well, just not so much? THis is a negotiation. You don't start off with what you want, you go big and get what you can. If the company doesn't play ball, then we all keep the status quo. Ok by me.

Sled
No, what I am saying is there is built in value in BOTH clauses. Your MEC is asking for additional compensation above and beyond. Just because you can't see the the value in a paycheck doesn't mean it's not there, your MEC wants to see the value in the form of dollars.

The value of PS to me is about $2000, the value of the "furlough" clause to the last guy on the UAL list? the value of block hour protection when the old UAL 757's are removed from the fleet?

I am glad your MEC is trying to go big, but really what your "chairperson" is doing is torpedoing the whole T&PA. It's time for a shift in thinking, your MEC thinks they're dealing with UAL mgt. I've said it before, the company doesn't value or respect pilots, we are a cost center, period. They speak only in dollars. You have witnessed it first hand, safety is for sale at the new United
liquid is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:35 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
This slippery slope is exactly why we should just STICK TO OUR CONTRACTS. If co-worker Jeff wants something else, give us our OVERDUE JCBA!
Ok I'll say it. I AGREE!
liquid is offline  
Old 12-23-2011, 09:15 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by liquid
..."Why is it the UALMEC feels they deserve more compensation above the current T&PA? again a pure money grab by your MEC.
Well, that's your opinion. I won't go into detail as this has been hashed out ad nauseam on the other forum but let me shorten and spin this another way...

CAL's right to PS expired. It's gone. Just because you had it in years past means nothing today. Yes, it sucks. But it is your contract.

Your MEC and MC are the ones who began "a pure money grab" by going after PS because it is still in the UAL contract. For your group to get something mid stream, during contract negotiations is the grab. The UAL MEC responded buy saying what's good the goose is good for the gander, after CAL's move.

Let me add that I have nothing against you guys getting PS, the more you can squeeze out of mgmt the better. But, UCAL cannot arbitrarily give you guys something outside of the contract without opening a huge can of worms. There is no way if the situation was reversed that you guys wouldn't feel the same way. And that is what all the fuss is about.

I think perhaps this is a tactical move by the UAL MEC (and perhaps BOTH) to put additional pressure on the company to get the JCBA moving. If they pony up for you guys, then they will create havoc over here. And if they are forced to give US additional compensation somewhere, they'll incite the CAL guys. We need to do something to get el hefe moving.

PS is nice, but it's crap. As cyclical and as capitol intensive this industry is, and with creative accounting profits come and go like cheap tarts. I want my profit sharing meted out every two weeks in the form of decent wages that I can BANK on. I want it in some form of retribution for the theft of my pension and all the BS we've endured since 9/11.

Again, not trying to incite more fecal tossing. But to say that the UAL MEC is using this as a money grab is disingenuous.

I'll be happy to buy you a beer after walking the picket line.
oldmako is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrvmo
Major
12
02-12-2008 05:55 PM
A320fumes
Major
1
02-25-2007 01:14 PM
AAflyer
Major
24
01-23-2007 12:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices