Wendy's Video
#21
I've posted the link about 3 times in the last month, is that too much? Considering what's at stake for United Pilots, I don't think it's enough.
I'm obviously in the camp that feels that a candidate that comes from one side or the other of a deeply divided and dysfunctional MEC is not an option. I want a MEC chair who can get a unanimous vote based on merit, not half the votes based on politics that hamstring all UA pilots.
Which candidate do you think that would be?
I'm obviously in the camp that feels that a candidate that comes from one side or the other of a deeply divided and dysfunctional MEC is not an option. I want a MEC chair who can get a unanimous vote based on merit, not half the votes based on politics that hamstring all UA pilots.
Which candidate do you think that would be?
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fero's
Posts: 472
Agreed, that's what all line pilots expect, but the reality is that in the past 2 years that hasn't happened. To elect a candidate from either of the current camps represented at the MEC will likely just flip (or continue) the balance of political power and bring line pilots 2 more years of inaction.
The current MEC appears to be a microcosm of national politics where it's not about what's right, it's about who's right and neither side is willing to concede a thing. Another good deal for United Pilots.
The current MEC appears to be a microcosm of national politics where it's not about what's right, it's about who's right and neither side is willing to concede a thing. Another good deal for United Pilots.
#23
#24
#26
I'm not suggesting that the current MEC chair has been any more effective than the last, far from it. My opinion is that if the MEC sets the stage in the next election to continue to play East vs. West, then it's going to be 2 more years of the same.
I'm ready for a change, and I agree that 10/18 can't come soon enough.
I'm ready for a change, and I agree that 10/18 can't come soon enough.
#27
Didn't Jay bring us the T feckless TPA which expires at the end of December? The one which could potentially cost thousands of us at UAL our jobs? How come there are protections in the CAL letter but not the UAL? That Jay?
Isn't Jay the Neg chair on the current contract? Won't his leaving that position only drag out the JCBA even further?
I don't know Jay from shinola but there is an active thread on the other forum which aligns him very closely with Paul Whiteford and a whole bunch of crap from the bankruptcy. So, without further info I am quite skeptical of him. Hell the two points above make him a non starter in my eyes.
6000 or so guys at UAL and we can't some up with someone else? And WHY must the MC always be a widebody type?
Isn't Jay the Neg chair on the current contract? Won't his leaving that position only drag out the JCBA even further?
I don't know Jay from shinola but there is an active thread on the other forum which aligns him very closely with Paul Whiteford and a whole bunch of crap from the bankruptcy. So, without further info I am quite skeptical of him. Hell the two points above make him a non starter in my eyes.
6000 or so guys at UAL and we can't some up with someone else? And WHY must the MC always be a widebody type?
Last edited by oldmako; 10-06-2011 at 04:46 AM.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
I am not much of an alpa fan anymore regardless. Some of the weakness in 1985 started this but over the years watching our Alpa brothers waiting for ch-11 and hoping other airlines would liquidate, some even signing contracts to help us liquidate kind of sours me to the alpa brotherhood.
Even have some moderators here that sound like they can't wait for amr to file and maybe break apart so they can get the pieces, yes I realize that amr is not alpa.
I also do not think that things will get settled here regardless of who is in office. The company does not want to settle anything or it would be done by now. All I keep seeing that benefit at all is high level management, our hundreds of pilot managers that never really do anything that has to do with flying an airplane, yes hundreds. Certainly our lca's are having a great time while they run there banks to well over 50 hours a month, sorry except the cal lca's who get it all paid out monthly, so I am told, our guys will be all over this when they can. Maybe 120-140 a month while deadheading around the system.
As a line pilot all we see is the same old song and dance from the union and the company, oh and some flow changes and call outs. The other change I keep seeing is some of our flying being swithed to the other side.
You think Baldwin or anyone else is going to start to change this, maybe, seems liketoo little too late from what I keep seeing.
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Well, don't know CAL's work rules, but I must admit UAL isn't the greatest. Being at NKS before coming over to UAL, was a bit of an adjustment as far as some of those, and the pay. BUT, NOT paying for medical benefits, LONG call, etc... wasn't "BAD".
I am more worried about SCOPE and PAY!!!
So he "smiled" at trying to keep UAL "Work" rules... what are some of the other things you found ridiculous and inaccurate? Maybe he was happy that the MEC didn't decide to lean towards the CALs work rules for "higher" wages...
Maybe you received the email because you're on the email list for ALPA, and they are trying to keep you "informed"?
Not taking sides, but trying to be neutral.
I am more worried about SCOPE and PAY!!!
So he "smiled" at trying to keep UAL "Work" rules... what are some of the other things you found ridiculous and inaccurate? Maybe he was happy that the MEC didn't decide to lean towards the CALs work rules for "higher" wages...
Maybe you received the email because you're on the email list for ALPA, and they are trying to keep you "informed"?
Not taking sides, but trying to be neutral.
The other one that stuck with me really strongly was his, again capitalized, insistence that Wendy only did what the majority of the MEC wanted, and always followed majority MEC direction. This was right after the special MEC meeting where two resolutions that passed by a majorty (I believe 9-6) were deemed untimely? (might not have been untimely.... Can't remember the exact term) by Wendy. She was able to do this because there wasn't a 2/3 majority. You can support your team, but to post (in caps) two "facts" that had been shown to be inaccurate days before didn't exactly smack with credibility.
I've flown quite frequently with one of these "thugs" on the MEC. I take what he says with some salt, as I know the MEC is a political animal, but the things he says have proved accurate in most cases. The simple fact is, we don't have a contract, we didn't get an equity stake in the new company, and our moment of leverage was lost. All this happened with Wendy at the helm. I think her actions contributed greatly to all these things. Before you flame me for that last statement, go ask how many ALPA reps were parked in the justice department while they were considering this merger. How many did Delta have up there? When did the company stop playing "nice"? **hint, it was the DAY after the DOJ approved the merger. I'm not suggesting that everything could have been done perfectly smoothly, but I do believe it could have been done better. A LOT better. At the very least, we should have been able to negotiate an equity stake, just like DAL did, and just like we did during Ch 11.
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Apologies for the typos above... Sent from an iPhone. By the way, I'm pretty frustrated with both "camps" as well. There is plenty of blame to go around, and I firmly believe out MEC is broken. I just take exception to someone watching Wendy's video and taking it as "fact". It's a political ploy... Something both sides need to stop doing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post