Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Questions about 787s at UAL/CAL >

Questions about 787s at UAL/CAL

Search

Notices

Questions about 787s at UAL/CAL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2011, 12:05 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Boeing
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If you are talking the 777LR it is much better then the 747 at very long ranges. The 747 is actually better at mid range flights where they can fill all the seats and carry cargo. At extreme ranges it can't do that but the 777 LR can do it easily.
I would say that the ability to fly up to 14+ hours with everything filled pretty much covers most of the heavy lifting
caflyer is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:38 PM
  #32  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
There you have it. How much etops fuel does a 777 land with in SYD after having flown from LAX? How much revenue is bumped due to the etops fuel requirements?
I believe what your hinting at regarding the LAX-SYD leg 'maybe' true using the UAL B777-200ER, but as recent as 2005, the B777-200LR holds the title of "world's longest range commercial aircraft" without refueling....22Hrs+ worth. Ironically enough, the previous record holder on the above mentioned title was B747-400 (London-SYD 10,500) back in 1989.

Go figure....Who would have guessed that the "E" vs "L" would have made 'all' the difference.

Don Phillips
International Herald Tribune
11-11-2005
Breaking an aviation distance record set 43 years ago by a B-52 bomber, a new long-range Boeing 777 flew more than halfway around the world nonstop Thursday in 22 hours and 42 minutes. One hundred years after the Wright Brothers established the tradition of official distance records with a 25-minute flight in a puttering biplane, the flight demonstrated that for the first time that a new generation of jetliners will leave no two cities on earth beyond a nonstop flight. The new plane, a Boeing 777-200LR, loaded with fuel in every tank, entered the Guinness Book of World Records by flying 11,664 nautical miles from Hong Kong to London.

Last edited by SoCalGuy; 06-07-2011 at 01:13 PM.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:42 PM
  #33  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
I believe what your hinting at regarding the LAX-SYD leg at 'maybe' true using the UAL B777-200ER, but as recent as 2005, the B777-200LR holds the title of "world's longest range commercial aircraft" without refueling....22Hrs+ worth. Ironically enough, the previous record holder on the above mentioned title was B747-400 (London-SYD 10,500) back in 1989.

Go figure....Who would have guessed that the "E" vs "L" would have made 'all' the difference.

Don Phillips
International Herald Tribune
11-11-2005
Breaking an aviation distance record set 43 years ago by a B-52 bomber, a new long-range Boeing 777 flew more than halfway around the world nonstop Thursday in 22 hours and 42 minutes. One hundred years after the Wright Brothers established the tradition of official distance records with a 25-minute flight in a puttering biplane, the flight demonstrated that for the first time that a new generation of jetliners will leave no two cities on earth beyond a nonstop flight. The new plane, a Boeing 777-200LR, loaded with fuel in every tank, entered the Guinness Book of World Records by flying 11,664 nautical miles from Hong Kong to London.
Note that it flew HKG-London the long way! Direct path is 5200 miles. They went the other way. Truly amazing.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 12:45 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

What kind of sick bastards would put someone on an airplane for 22 hours???
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 01:12 PM
  #35  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Note that it flew HKG-London the long way! Direct path is 5200 miles. They went the other way. Truly amazing.
Thus the 11K+ miles....Damn over achievers!!

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
What kind of sick bastards would put someone on an airplane for 22 hours???
Coto....where you been?!? I couldn't agree with you more!!
Hope all has been well.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 01:36 PM
  #36  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by jaykris
And I can ony guess that the CAL guys will be stuck on all the narrow guage aircraft they have.....UAL has six time more widebodies than CAL,
so dont press that fence idea very hard...
113 WB at UAL vs 48 WB at CAL

Not quite 6 times, looks like 2.3 times is more like it!
dogger is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 04:05 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Great. Blame it on labor.
William Swelbar, a research engineer at MIT's International Center for Air Transportation, said discord over pilot seniority rankings could be hampering progress of contract talks.

Employees with high seniority get first choice on vacations and fly the biggest planes that come with the best pay rates.

Pilots themselves decide how to interlace their seniority lists, so it's not on the agenda in contract talks with the company. Separate seniority discussions between the pilot groups won't start until they reach a joint contract with the airline, the union said.

But Swelbar suspects that seniority is insinuating its way into contract negotiations because work rules inevitably bear on questions of pay and rank.

For example, United has about 300 captains who fly wide-bodied jumbo 747-400s. Continental has no comparable plane.

"United's going to want to protect that wide-bodied flying for itself," Swelbar said.

Continental, United pilots say joint contract is nowhere near done | cleveland.com

Last edited by APC225; 06-07-2011 at 07:21 PM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 08:36 PM
  #38  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

William Swelbar, a research engineer at MIT's International Center for Air Transportation, said discord over pilot seniority rankings could be hampering progress of contract talks.

Employees with high seniority get first choice on vacations and fly the biggest planes that come with the best pay rates.

Pilots themselves decide how to interlace their seniority lists, so it's not on the agenda in contract talks with the company. Separate seniority discussions between the pilot groups won't start until they reach a joint contract with the airline, the union said.

But Swelbar suspects that seniority is insinuating its way into contract negotiations because work rules inevitably bear on questions of pay and rank.

For example, United has about 300 captains who fly wide-bodied jumbo 747-400s. Continental has no comparable plane.

"United's going to want to protect that wide-bodied flying for itself," Swelbar said.

Continental, United pilots say joint contract is nowhere near done | cleveland.com
Sweet.....Another master piece from the all knowing "Swel-blog".
Swelblog / Swelbar on Airlines - Articles
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 07:10 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by jaykris
And I can ony guess that the CAL guys will be stuck on all the narrow guage aircraft they have.....UAL has six time more widebodies than CAL,
so dont press that fence idea very hard...
As was mentioned above:

UAL 113 (210 IF you want to include 757s)
CAL 46 (108 IF again you include the 757s)...two 767-200s sold, btw.

2.45:1 or 1.94:1

Just the facts please.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 07:17 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
Default

Originally Posted by dogger
113 WB at UAL vs 48 WB at CAL

Not quite 6 times, looks like 2.3 times is more like it!
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
As was mentioned above:

UAL 113 (210 IF you want to include 757s)
CAL 46 (108 IF again you include the 757s)...two 767-200s sold, btw.

2.45:1 or 1.94:1

Just the facts please.
That's because each 747 counts for 7.27 WB.... duh.
threeighteen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rvrabel2002
Career Questions
18
10-28-2021 12:04 PM
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
62
10-04-2008 08:28 PM
CAL EWR
Major
1
03-12-2007 09:53 AM
warriordriver
Hiring News
1
03-02-2007 12:54 PM
Cosmik
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-08-2007 07:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices