Search

Notices

Rumor control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2011, 05:30 AM
  #11  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
DEN is already a ghost-town
No doubt. With the new United having a significant hub presence on the east, west, north and south borders of the US, the future of DEN as a hub is probably already determined somewhere in the halls of Willis Tower.

Additionally, the two guys running marketing and flight ops respectively (Jim Compton and Fred Abbott) have never been shy about optimizing segments, equipment and routing. Out of IAH, we've been doing DEN-SEA, DEN-FLL, and DEN-EWR for a month or so in 737-800/900 equipment. There may be other hub segments through DEN. I'm just not aware of them.

When one additionally considers that legacy carriers have been ceding domestic market share to low fare/small jet carriers for years, the future of DEN will probably not be as one remembers the past, unfortunately.

Last edited by Old UCAL CA; 06-01-2011 at 05:21 AM.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 07:44 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by jumppilot
I flew in there today and they were using 25 for departure, with a line up of 25 (which I actually counted).

I saw 5 Southwest, 4 United and untold numbers of Skywest, Republic and Great Lakes.

Awesome.

I can't wait until Age 65 hits and we hire a lot of those regional pilots. I came over 5 years ago and know how important scope is - they will too.
Why hire those guys? Just contract for more RJ flying and they can stay there!
furloughforlife is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 10:01 AM
  #13  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by furloughforlife
Why hire those guys? Just contract for more RJ flying and they can stay there!
Plus they would have to give up too much in pay and seniority.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 06-04-2011, 06:24 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
No doubt. With the new United having a significant hub presence on the east, west, north and south borders of the US, the future of DEN as a hub is probably already determined somewhere in the halls of Willis Tower.

Additionally, the two guys running marketing and flight ops respectively (Jim Compton and Fred Abbott) have never been shy about optimizing segments, equipment and routing. Out of IAH, we've been doing DEN-SEA, DEN-FLL, and DEN-EWR for a month or so in 737-800/900 equipment. There may be other hub segments through DEN. I'm just not aware of them.

When one additionally considers that legacy carriers have been ceding domestic market share to low fare/small jet carriers for years, the future of DEN will probably not be as one remembers the past, unfortunately.

So copy this post down and put it in your wallet 'cuz I'll bet you 3 beers and a dinner that come 2015 Denver will still be a hub for 3 reasons:

1) UAL invested billions and the payoff doesn't work unless you stay.
2) SWA and Frontier are VERY active in that market
3) As UAL controls more than 80% market share the yields are good.

So like I said take this post and copy it and if we fly together in 2015 and I'm wrong dinner and drinks are on me

Joe Peck
UAL IADFO-76/75
Sunvox is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 04:50 AM
  #15  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
So copy this post down and put it in your wallet 'cuz I'll bet you 3 beers and a dinner that come 2015 Denver will still be a hub for 3 reasons:

1) UAL invested billions and the payoff doesn't work unless you stay.
2) SWA and Frontier are VERY active in that market
3) As UAL controls more than 80% market share the yields are good.

So like I said take this post and copy it and if we fly together in 2015 and I'm wrong dinner and drinks are on me

Joe Peck
UAL IADFO-76/75
It may still be a hub, I don't disagree with that. It just might lack the "gravitas" that it has had in the past...especially if we consider your number 2 and the "full compass" US coast influence the new United now has.

I'll buy no matter the outcome. It'll have to be earlier than 2015 though...I'm already "gummin" and 2015 is closer to 70 than 60. Ditto

Last edited by Old UCAL CA; 06-05-2011 at 07:09 AM.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Old 06-05-2011, 05:20 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
So copy this post down and put it in your wallet 'cuz I'll bet you 3 beers and a dinner that come 2015 Denver will still be a hub for 3 reasons:

1) UAL invested billions and the payoff doesn't work unless you stay.
2) SWA and Frontier are VERY active in that market
3) As UAL controls more than 80% market share the yields are good.

So like I said take this post and copy it and if we fly together in 2015 and I'm wrong dinner and drinks are on me

Joe Peck
UAL IADFO-76/75
I'd tend to agree, especially since Frontier is bleeding money right now and they are already mentioning "efficiency initiatives" to turn around the operation. Bedford's great experiment is going to come at the cost to the employees.
EWRflyr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices