Furlough "Opportunity"
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 215
#32
#33
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
I don't post much here. I rather just try to watch and learn. I read a lot of the posts in all the threads. I hope to make it some day to a major, thats why I keep a tight lip. But I must admit, seeing how a few people went after mshunter for posting an opnion on how guys can't/won't fly for a regional because of a pay cut? I don't understand?
#34
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
I don't post much here. I rather just try to watch and learn. I read a lot of the posts in all the threads. I hope to make it some day to a major, thats why I keep a tight lip. But I must admit, seeing how a few people went after mshunter for posting an opnion on how guys can't/won't fly for a regional because of a pay cut? I don't understand?
Since we are going back on topic here, if you would care for a further explanation feel free to PM me, and I'll explain
Last edited by gettinbumped; 03-31-2011 at 12:16 AM.
#35
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
You guys should go to the job interview and tell the person doing the interview your salary requirement is 150K a year. Or at least have fun with it and screw with them.
On a side note.....a CAL Flight attendent tops out at $52 an hour.......52 an hour. Thats more than just about any regional FO. Now lets compare responsibilities. YHGTBKM I was an ignorant regional FO once so i'm guilty as charged, but come on guys stand up. $52 an hour.....
On a side note.....a CAL Flight attendent tops out at $52 an hour.......52 an hour. Thats more than just about any regional FO. Now lets compare responsibilities. YHGTBKM I was an ignorant regional FO once so i'm guilty as charged, but come on guys stand up. $52 an hour.....
#37
I don't post much here. I rather just try to watch and learn. I read a lot of the posts in all the threads. I hope to make it some day to a major, thats why I keep a tight lip. But I must admit, seeing how a few people went after mshunter for posting an opnion on how guys can't/won't fly for a regional because of a pay cut? I don't understand?
#38
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
Thats why I don't understand. I thought you guys were saying the same basic thing. I don't fully understand contract negoations, but don't you vote on things like scope and pay? I am not also sure I fully understand exactly what "scope" means.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
I started making 16K a year in the 90s then went to UAL in 99 and have been furloughed twice. I cannot and will not stomach going back to those wages and work rules. The difference is I have a family and a mortgage now. We live in a rural, cheap area of the country in a very (less than 120K house), but I still cannot afford to go back to the commuters plain and simple. Luckily I have the military to fall back on, but many of my fallen brethren do not. While I do not begrudge anybody who currently works at the regionals, I have a real problem with the fact that I am laid off while some Embraer captain at Republic or wherever thinks they have landed a career because they now get to fly a left seat of an 70+ seater. Its not personal, unless you are on the end where, yes, ALPA failed, and the only hope now is to reverse the losses in scope. I will not shed a tear when/if they lay off at Republic or anywhere else when the lay offs come. I mean nobody any harm but when you have collected unemployment for awhile, and then offered to essentially do your old job for 1/4 the cost, it is insulting. Those who can't understand that are woefully confused.
Anyway, thanks for asking questions and being willing to learn here. Anybody can have an opinion and shoot it of in the wrong place. Everybody, including myself, can learn something new at any time.
Peace-
KC
#40
Scope is what is covered by the contract including what flying has to be done by pilots covered under the contract and what flying can be done by pilots at another airline. At United, this includes flying that is done by United Express in jets and turbo props up to seventy seats, as well as flying that is done by other alliance partners like Lufthansa, US Air and others. The company was very successful in reducing this coverage during bankruptcy and the pilots now want it returned to where it had been prior to that. The MEC chairman at United signed a letter of agreement with the company without the consent of the pilots that allowed an almost unlimited number of regional jets to replace United flying. This along with other ALPA endorsed things like increaing the FAA mandated retirement age from 60 to 65 has cost many of us our jobs. At Continental the scope language prohibits the company from flying any jets larger than 50 seats. The pilots from United and Continental are now negotiating a single contract that will cover both groups after the integration is complete. The pilots are pushing to get 70 seat flying back and the company wants Express to be able to fly 90 seaters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post