FAA: "JCBA and SLI before SOC"?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Ch 9 is not a bargaining chip. All you do is tick off the passengers that actually want to listen. Smisek can not put a value on CH 9 that would lead to loss of revenue versus giving you a pay raise.
Here is a novel thought. Let the negotiating committee do their job and stop trying to screw the pax. If and when we are called upon to suspend our services then do so. Try to do the job with some dignity as opposed to the emotion of a 12 year old for a change. Too many Wallachites want to burn their house down. The process is still taking place. When it breaks down and you are legally allowed to participate in a job action then that is fine. Walk the line and carry your chin held high.
Here is a novel thought. Let the negotiating committee do their job and stop trying to screw the pax. If and when we are called upon to suspend our services then do so. Try to do the job with some dignity as opposed to the emotion of a 12 year old for a change. Too many Wallachites want to burn their house down. The process is still taking place. When it breaks down and you are legally allowed to participate in a job action then that is fine. Walk the line and carry your chin held high.
#22
Well, because Smisek clearly won't listen to us... but he might listen to all the Premier passengers complaining when its not there anymore. I know its hard to believe, but there are many passengers who love it more than any other flight entertainment; and some who fly United specifically for that purpose!(If you are a UA pilot you probably have seen some passesnger getting emotional over Ch. 9)
ALPA is certainly not perfect, but it's a lot better at eventually securing a contract than any individual is. I'm waiting just like everyone else, but I'm not about to dump my emotional baggage on my passengers. How about this spin: the more profitable UAL is, the better our contract will be. Not a perfect concept, but better than chasing business out the door.
TW
#23
Sorry, but Smisek doesn't give a rat's Ⓐⓢⓢ about CH 9, or what passengers say, or anything about flying. UAL is a business, pure and simple. Not an airline, per se.
ALPA is certainly not perfect, but it's a lot better at eventually securing a contract than any individual is. I'm waiting just like everyone else, but I'm not about to dump my emotional baggage on my passengers. How about this spin: the more profitable UAL is, the better our contract will be. Not a perfect concept, but better than chasing business out the door.
TW
ALPA is certainly not perfect, but it's a lot better at eventually securing a contract than any individual is. I'm waiting just like everyone else, but I'm not about to dump my emotional baggage on my passengers. How about this spin: the more profitable UAL is, the better our contract will be. Not a perfect concept, but better than chasing business out the door.
TW
L
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Yes. I especially like the rates we are getting paid now. Like $159 for a 767 Captain, which is less than a Fedex F/O makes. Or $137 for an Airbus Captain, which is less than a SWA F/O makes. Do you like these rates Lambourne? Oh, I can see making a living at $159 an hour like yourself and T/W, but we have F/Os topped out at second year SWA pay! ($94/hr is UAL 12th year pay, or 2nd year pay at SWA!!!!!!) BTW, did you like it when the Company called in sick last month for a negotiation session? Or how about the joke of the Sec 5 proposal they returned last week. They are laughing at us. Play nice if you wish, I will be the "teenage girl".
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
ALPA is certainly not perfect, but it's a lot better at eventually securing a contract than any individual is. I'm waiting just like everyone else, but I'm not about to dump my emotional baggage on my passengers. How about this spin: the more profitable UAL is, the better our contract will be. Not a perfect concept, but better than chasing business out the door.
TW
TW
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Ch 9 is not a bargaining chip. All you do is tick off the passengers that actually want to listen. Smisek can not put a value on CH 9 that would lead to loss of revenue versus giving you a pay raise.
Here is a novel thought. Let the negotiating committee do their job and stop trying to screw the pax. If and when we are called upon to suspend our services then do so. Try to do the job with some dignity as opposed to the emotion of a 12 year old for a change. Too many Wallachites want to burn their house down. The process is still taking place. When it breaks down and you are legally allowed to participate in a job action then that is fine. Walk the line and carry your chin held high.
Here is a novel thought. Let the negotiating committee do their job and stop trying to screw the pax. If and when we are called upon to suspend our services then do so. Try to do the job with some dignity as opposed to the emotion of a 12 year old for a change. Too many Wallachites want to burn their house down. The process is still taking place. When it breaks down and you are legally allowed to participate in a job action then that is fine. Walk the line and carry your chin held high.
Now excuse me, my bus is coming to pick me up and take me to school. I can't wait to see Bobby now that we are back from Spring Break! Since he just turned 13, I can say I'm going steady with an older guy! Like, OMG!!!
#27
Yes. I especially like the rates we are getting paid now. Like $159 for a 767 Captain, which is less than a Fedex F/O makes. Or $137 for an Airbus Captain, which is less than a SWA F/O makes. Do you like these rates Lambourne? Oh, I can see making a living at $159 an hour like yourself and T/W, but we have F/Os topped out at second year SWA pay! ($94/hr is UAL 12th year pay, or 2nd year pay at SWA!!!!!!) BTW, did you like it when the Company called in sick last month for a negotiation session? Or how about the joke of the Sec 5 proposal they returned last week. They are laughing at us. Play nice if you wish, I will be the "teenage girl".
None of those conditions exists today. The pilot contracts that have been negotiated since my hire date in 1986 have all dragged on for several years. There were times when our MEC dragged their feet instead of the company. This is no different.
You're no more frustrated than anyone else, myself included, but I don't believe that sabotaging the operation is the way to speed up contract negotiations.
There is one exception, however, and that is to find ourselves at the brink of a well thought-out and carefully planned, legal work stoppage. If the company truly wants to avoid that and they believe that we are well-prepared for a strike and we see it as the only alternative at that time, we will have a contract. If they truly don't care whether we strike or not, then they were never going to negotiate in good faith anyway.
The way to find out their intention is to methodically organize a strike. Have you heard of the Strike Preparedness Committee? It does not advocate acting like a teenage girl. It advocates thinking like adults whom know what they want and know what they have to do to get what they want.
The best thing every one of us can do; UA and CO pilots, is to become actively engaged with their local Family Awareness programs, which is an integral part of the Strike Preparedness Committee, and show the company our solidarity. As long as the company moles read all over the 'net how disjointed this group can be when it tries, they have no reason to perceive the threat of a strike as real.
In 1985, the UALMEC struck United Airlines. On the vast majority of levels, it was a success. The reason is because the vast majority of United Pilots were in strong unison.
That is what will secure a contract, and not refusing a product from paying passengers.
TW
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
I sure don't need another e-mail from a chief pilot to tell us how they are in japan and all that bs. Seems like many e-mails from these guys just tell us what a great job they are doing, please.
Last edited by syd111; 03-29-2011 at 09:23 AM.
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
............There is one exception, however, and that is to find ourselves at the brink of a well thought-out and carefully planned, legal work stoppage. If the company truly wants to avoid that and they believe that we are well-prepared for a strike and we see it as the only alternative at that time, we will have a contract. If they truly don't care whether we strike or not, then they were never going to negotiate in good faith anyway.
The way to find out their intention is to methodically organize a strike. Have you heard of the Strike Preparedness Committee? It does not advocate acting like a teenage girl. It advocates thinking like adults whom know what they want and know what they have to do to get what they want. ...................
TW
The way to find out their intention is to methodically organize a strike. Have you heard of the Strike Preparedness Committee? It does not advocate acting like a teenage girl. It advocates thinking like adults whom know what they want and know what they have to do to get what they want. ...................
TW
Management drags negoiations out for years, union leaders suck the proverbial teet while generally not working the line and the average line pilot gets screwed after the stockholm syndrome rears its ugly head and we are snockered into voting for another sub-standard POS with half or less of the retro pay we should have been making from day one.
Sorry, strike this.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Yes I have. In fact, I know the Committee chair. I doubt you will see ch 9 on in his cockpit. I turned it on when I was a Captain, but I wouldn't now...not until I had a TA. In fact, there are a whole list of things I did before that I don't do now. I suspect I am not alone. I wonder what that costs?
Sled
Sled
Last edited by jsled; 03-29-2011 at 01:39 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post