Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL furloughs and CAL hiring. >

UAL furloughs and CAL hiring.

Search

Notices

UAL furloughs and CAL hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2011, 08:02 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,905
Default

At the company crew room visits it has been stated that the company will make do with current staffing through the remainder of the year. I wouldn't be holding my breath for any vacancies on either side until the company is absolutely forced into them by FT/DT rules and age 65. Oil is currently not going in a direction favorable to needing more pilots unfortunatelyl
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:36 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

united used to say that furloughs made no sense unless the time line was greater than 24 months. Note that I said "used".

That being said I am planning on a spring furlough and I'm trying to stockpile cash. smisek wants to toss us a minimal bone of a pay raise, and have us all flying with continentals work rules. When the coach turns to a pumpkin on Dec 31, he'll start flexing muscle to that end, and the UAL guys are going to take it in the shorts first.

He wants to cut domestic capacity. Oil is through the roof and from watching the news will remain so for some time.

How's that for a happy post?

While I can see scenario's which would fuel recalls and actually grow the airline in anticipation of the age 65 retirements, I'm not going to hang my hat on them. This place is a turd.

If not flying on May third, I will be there.
oldmako is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 10:44 AM
  #43  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default Break the code??

Originally Posted by oldmako
smisek wants to toss us a minimal bone of a pay raise, and have us all flying with continentals work rules.
(complete.....)
+ "Old" United's current SCOPE = Smisek's wet dream.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 10:54 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

Originally Posted by kc135driver
My official prediction, if oil does not go to $140, with the assumption we still will not have a JCBA, and the flight rest NPRM is stalled...

is recalls on BOTH sides will slowly begin Dec-Feb of this year for classes in Mar 2012. Age 65 will affect both sides.

KC
Yea, but age 65 is still a long ways away from kicking in. Don't think of 2012 as the year, but 2013. It's only the last few days of 2012 that counts. I'm not impressed by the actual retirement numbers when you figure that there are 11,000 pilots on the new list. I'd add a year to your calculation. Sorry. I hope they bring guys back sooner, but I expect them to cut flying and aircraft.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 11:07 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Yea, but age 65 is still a long ways away from kicking in. Don't think of 2012 as the year, but 2013. It's only the last few days of 2012 that counts. I'm not impressed by the actual retirement numbers when you figure that there are 11,000 pilots on the new list. I'd add a year to your calculation. Sorry. I hope they bring guys back sooner, but I expect them to cut flying and aircraft.
They already are cutting flying and I think shortly aircraft. Does anyone know where our leaders hedged fuel?

I was positive for a while but this looks like the same old song and dance.
syd111 is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 11:21 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Yea, but age 65 is still a long ways away from kicking in. Don't think of 2012 as the year, but 2013. It's only the last few days of 2012 that counts. I'm not impressed by the actual retirement numbers when you figure that there are 11,000 pilots on the new list. I'd add a year to your calculation. Sorry. I hope they bring guys back sooner, but I expect them to cut flying and aircraft.
I'd agree with you, my prediction above could easily slip 12+ months. I think we will hear something soon, heck UAL dropped another 6% today alone due to oil.
kc135driver is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 11:25 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

The retirements are huge, one pilot every 18 hours beginning December of next year and continuning for years. The training department on the United side is a ghost town and will have to begin staffing to accomadate this at least 6 months before the retirements begin. As they pull pilots back into TK this in itself will create vacancies. I don't see them parking planes on the United side, but it wouldn't surprise me if CO' older 737's and 767's are retired.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 11:35 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
The retirements are huge, one pilot every 18 hours beginning December of next year and continuning for years. The training department on the United side is a ghost town and will have to begin staffing to accomadate this at least 6 months before the retirements begin. As they pull pilots back into TK this in itself will create vacancies. I don't see them parking planes on the United side, but it wouldn't surprise me if CO' older 737's and 767's are retired.
Thinking out loud here, but if both sides have furlough protection through the end of this year, and then CO after that, AND it is only CO aircraft that are being talked about being parked (I know anything can change), it would seem to me that mgmt CAN'T really park ANY CO airplanes for the foreseeable future until they negotiate a JCBA? So mgmt has tied their own hands for now?? What am I missing.

I still say they need to park about 100+ 50 seaters, give us a new contract then we move on.
kc135driver is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:19 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by kc135driver
Thinking out loud here, but if both sides have furlough protection through the end of this year, and then CO after that, AND it is only CO aircraft that are being talked about being parked (I know anything can change), it would seem to me that mgmt CAN'T really park ANY CO airplanes for the foreseeable future until they negotiate a JCBA? So mgmt has tied their own hands for now?? What am I missing.....
Not sure but CA I flew with today said CAL had already sold 2 of the 10 767-200's we were looking to get rid of. Anyone substantiate?
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:49 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
They already are cutting flying and I think shortly aircraft. Does anyone know where our leaders hedged fuel?

I was positive for a while but this looks like the same old song and dance.
I could not find the hedge price, but UAL was/is hedged 63, 50, 34, and 17% for the four consecutive three month periods of 2011.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RandyBMC
United
31
06-04-2014 10:04 AM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 04:40 PM
tailwheel48
United
63
11-22-2010 03:08 PM
swscap
Major
61
07-28-2009 02:38 AM
Brown
Major
21
09-10-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices