The curtain is pulled back a little more...
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Get used to it. It's the central mentality of our new management team. They will almost always fly the smallest piece of equip they can and just add frequency if capacity issues arise. As a CAL guy I'm terrified of what Jeff would do to our domestic flying if he got to use the large lawn darts on us like Glenn did on you.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
************************************************** **********
I've seen this comment form CAL Pilots in the past and I'm wondering
Where do you Get the idea IN FACT that The CAL Rolls Royce engines OR any other engine is Better or more efficient than the PW2040's,PW4056/60,PW7077's or Pw4094's that United Flies? Because I can sure as hell tell you FACTUALLY, You have NO IDEA what you're talking about (CAL got Rolls-Royce Powered 757's because that's what EASTERN was flying on THEIR 757's when they went OVER TO CAL under LORENZO. While UAL ordererd theirs NEW with the PW2037.)
I've seen this comment form CAL Pilots in the past and I'm wondering
Where do you Get the idea IN FACT that The CAL Rolls Royce engines OR any other engine is Better or more efficient than the PW2040's,PW4056/60,PW7077's or Pw4094's that United Flies? Because I can sure as hell tell you FACTUALLY, You have NO IDEA what you're talking about (CAL got Rolls-Royce Powered 757's because that's what EASTERN was flying on THEIR 757's when they went OVER TO CAL under LORENZO. While UAL ordererd theirs NEW with the PW2037.)
#44
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 33
I'm not a CAL pilot and can only speak for the 757 Pratt vs Rolls part of your argument. I flew for ATA years ago and we operated B757's with both Pratt's and RB211's.
Rolls was lighter engine, produced more thrust and had a lower fuel burn. Obviously this gave us greater range, load and takeoff performance. We were always happier showing up to work and seeing an airframe with the RR's hanging on the wings.
Just the facts.
#45
Get used to it. It's the central mentality of our new management team. They will almost always fly the smallest piece of equip they can and just add frequency if capacity issues arise. As a CAL guy I'm terrified of what Jeff would do to our domestic flying if he got to use the large lawn darts on us like Glenn did on you.
#47
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
***Case in point***
LAX-HNL: B767-400 (2008)....B757-200 (2009)....B737-800 (2010-->)
See a trend here?? "CAL's Fleet Equipment Justification"....Jeff's habit's are alive and well for all to see....don't have to guess here about your above mentioned 'obsession'.
#48
************************************************** **********
I've seen this comment form CAL Pilots in the past and I'm wondering
Where do you Get the idea IN FACT that The CAL Rolls Royce engines OR any other engine is Better or more efficient than the PW2040's,PW4056/60,PW7077's or Pw4094's that United Flies? Because I can sure as hell tell you FACTUALLY, You have NO IDEA what you're talking about (CAL got Rolls-Royce Powered 757's because that's what EASTERN was flying on THEIR 757's when they went OVER TO CAL under LORENZO. While UAL ordererd theirs NEW with the PW2037.)
(Point in fact,, UAL will ALWAYS order Pratt over ANYBODY'S if given the choice or option! Also a point that GE knows very WELL in fact!)
What Route can the CAL 777's fly that UAL's CAN'T fly?? What Route can the CAL 757's or 767's fly that UAL's CAN'T fly?? One Idiot even claims that the UAL 777's are small engined "Ratty" airplanes. If that's REALLY so? Then We've fooled a Hell of a lot more people than Cal Has because We've flown SFO to ICN 13.5 hrs ONE WAY just fine. Where is your longerst route? And? When it comes time to FLY those "ratty" 747-400's,777-222,222ER's and 767-322's Are you going to say they're too OLD to fly? This' like "the Blind man Said ", "This I gotta SEE".
Whomever you are? You need to give the Old Ratty stuff a Break because
We Mantain our planes EVERY BIT as well as yours and the ONLY dofference is in the Cabins and UAL's are "Superior" in most EVERY way
Except for those Ord-Hawaii 777 "Cattle Cars" with 36F-312Y cabins.
I've seen this comment form CAL Pilots in the past and I'm wondering
Where do you Get the idea IN FACT that The CAL Rolls Royce engines OR any other engine is Better or more efficient than the PW2040's,PW4056/60,PW7077's or Pw4094's that United Flies? Because I can sure as hell tell you FACTUALLY, You have NO IDEA what you're talking about (CAL got Rolls-Royce Powered 757's because that's what EASTERN was flying on THEIR 757's when they went OVER TO CAL under LORENZO. While UAL ordererd theirs NEW with the PW2037.)
(Point in fact,, UAL will ALWAYS order Pratt over ANYBODY'S if given the choice or option! Also a point that GE knows very WELL in fact!)
What Route can the CAL 777's fly that UAL's CAN'T fly?? What Route can the CAL 757's or 767's fly that UAL's CAN'T fly?? One Idiot even claims that the UAL 777's are small engined "Ratty" airplanes. If that's REALLY so? Then We've fooled a Hell of a lot more people than Cal Has because We've flown SFO to ICN 13.5 hrs ONE WAY just fine. Where is your longerst route? And? When it comes time to FLY those "ratty" 747-400's,777-222,222ER's and 767-322's Are you going to say they're too OLD to fly? This' like "the Blind man Said ", "This I gotta SEE".
Whomever you are? You need to give the Old Ratty stuff a Break because
We Mantain our planes EVERY BIT as well as yours and the ONLY dofference is in the Cabins and UAL's are "Superior" in most EVERY way
Except for those Ord-Hawaii 777 "Cattle Cars" with 36F-312Y cabins.
Last edited by clambakejoe; 02-15-2011 at 12:14 PM.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
In your words...."A$$bag", get used to it.
***Case in point***
LAX-HNL: B767-400 (2008)....B757-200 (2009)....B737-800 (2010-->)
See a trend here?? "CAL's Fleet Equipment Justification"....Jeff's habit's are alive and well for all to see....don't have to guess here about your above mentioned 'obsession'.
***Case in point***
LAX-HNL: B767-400 (2008)....B757-200 (2009)....B737-800 (2010-->)
See a trend here?? "CAL's Fleet Equipment Justification"....Jeff's habit's are alive and well for all to see....don't have to guess here about your above mentioned 'obsession'.
#50
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Since that time (2008-ish), I have read....still Googling to find it & post it....that the Hawaii Market's yield is not as 'low' as once perceived.
You would be correct.....Since Larry, and now Jeff....."Size" has been something of a 'conservative' slant.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimmeAir
Flight Schools and Training
3
05-19-2009 04:31 PM