Search

Notices

Pass Travel Survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2011, 05:58 PM
  #121  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by Outsider
Seniority is seniority. If you retire you should be able to retain your seniority (there ain't much else left). As the old saying goes "you just didn't leave the farm soon enough,son."
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline does this, why should we?

Look, I have absolutely nothing against retiree's but at CAL, (and apparently every other airline out there), that isn't how it is done.

I'm dead set against retiree's having any priority at all above active employees but you did get vacation passes so I'll live with it and so should you.
757Driver is offline  
Old 04-16-2011, 07:19 PM
  #122  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Default

I don't know what other airlines do. I just know they (retirees) earned their seniority, just like WE are doing now and I have something intrinsically against taking someones seniority away. I'm an old schooler who HAS seen the airlines in general diminish the idea of seniority by building in many little protective devices for the sake of being more warm and fuzzy. It's just that with each little "warm and fuzzy" they build in, they are in fact "restricting seniority". So I know by now, seniority has taken on a different meaning than it used to be. So be it, I will in fact live with it. Take care.
Outsider is offline  
Old 04-16-2011, 08:21 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by Outsider
I'm an old schooler who HAS seen the airlines in general diminish the idea of seniority by building in many little protective devices for the sake of being more warm and fuzzy. It's just that with each little "warm and fuzzy" they build in, they are in fact "restricting seniority". So I know by now, seniority has taken on a different meaning than it used to be. So be it, I will in fact live with it. Take care.
Frankly, that is a bunch of baloney. With PBS, vacation, bidding - seniority has never been more heavily emphasized at UAL. Looking at PBS alone, if you're not in the top 30-40% in seat you get crap. It was never that way before PBS. I'm in the top 3% in seat by choice, and I get everything I want, but I'm giving up tens of thousands a year to get my life back. Very few have that choice.... Before PBS the schedules were much more homogenized. That is just one area. Pay is another. Just look at the UAL widebody rates WRT industry standard compared to the narrowbody. Narrow body is 15-20% below industry, while widebody is about 5% below. The junior, as it has always been, gets the short end of the stick over and over again. The real problem I have with that is that 12-15 years is junior now at UAL, whereas 2-3 years was considered "junior" in the past.
Take care as well,

Scott

Last edited by Scott Stoops; 04-17-2011 at 07:07 AM.
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 04-17-2011, 08:38 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,610
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline does this, why should we?
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline scope is limited to 50 seats, why should we?

Look, I have absolutely nothing against retiree's but at CAL, (and apparently every other airline out there), that isn't how it is done.
Look, I have absolutely nothing against junior guys, but at UAL (and apparently every other airline out there), 50 seat scope isn't how it is done.

I'm dead set against retiree's having any priority at all above active employees but you did get vacation passes so I'll live with it and so should you.
I'm dead set against junior guys bargaining for scope costing senior guys a few extra dollars, but you will get scope no higher than 70 seats (CRJ-900, EMB-190) so I'll live with it and so should you!
It is amazing how you can just change a word or two around and see that this is just a junior vs. senior thing. We should all be working together, not fighting in groups (Like USAir is with west/east). What a wet dream for management.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 04-17-2011, 09:05 AM
  #125  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
It is amazing how you can just change a word or two around and see that this is just a junior vs. senior thing. We should all be working together, not fighting in groups (Like USAir is with west/east). What a wet dream for management.
Touche' and good points but unfortunately doesn't change the landscape of pass benefits as they've been for the last 30 years.
757Driver is offline  
Old 04-17-2011, 12:12 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
It is amazing how you can just change a word or two around and see that this is just a junior vs. senior thing. We should all be working together, not fighting in groups (Like USAir is with west/east). What a wet dream for management.
I like the idea of working on the same team as management just like you said you liked in your time at Skywest. It can be like playing baseball. We get to be the catcher and management is the pitcher! We can even call the pitch and management if it thinks better can just shake us off. At least everyone will be 'working together'. Perhaps it will help us all 'fly right' as well.

Last edited by intrepidcv11; 04-17-2011 at 02:15 PM.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 04-17-2011, 12:39 PM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Default

Mr. Stoops
Sorry I don’t know how to cut and paste here, I’m a rookie at this.
Well I’ll take mine with some cheese and mustard.
I guess I was being too philosophical with too broad a swipe. I wasn’t referring to the Pilots’ contract specifically; I’m not even familiar with its intricacies. I was referring to all the airlines and all the unions over time. I was wondering why so many seem to think (or not) that it’s OK to strip away someones (retirees in this case) seniority. And I can only presume it’s because they’ve become accustomed to it (seniority restrictions) in so many little ways they have been desensitized.
I better add here that it’s not all presumption; I am somewhat familiar with some contracts at some airlines and familiar with other contracts going back to ’65.
Again, look what happens when we allow “them” to produce groups. They are us and we are them (or will be). There should be no groups.
Outsider is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 03:51 PM
  #128  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Early out/ Retiree
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
You think only CAL folks wanted this changed? I'm UAL and I wanted it changed. Pretty much everyone I talked to from ual wanted it changed.

You say you can "gaurantee" of being underrepresented. The provide that fact since you can make a gaurantee. When the majority wanted it changed to reflect common industry practice what did you expect?

If you take more than 8 trips then you will then have to suffer with the new policy. Otherwise sounds like a win. You could trump another retiree senior to you if you were on vacation pass and they weren't. However, I am guessing you will not accept your better boarding priority and let them ride ahead of you since you prefer the current system.

L
Your post don't make sense, you don't even know the UAL system, I doubt you're a UAL employee. Better boarding priority? How so when retirees become a "C" after the vacation passes which you active employees get also? Better boarding priority, now that's a laugh.
exualmech is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 03:58 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by exualmech
Your post don't make sense, you don't even know the UAL system, I doubt you're a UAL employee. Better boarding priority? How so when retirees become a "C" after the vacation passes which you active employees get also? Better boarding priority, now that's a laugh.

You are not getting the jist. Maybe it is the old age.... You GET 8 HIGH PRIORITY VACATION PASSES A YEAR. If you are traveling more than that then the regular employees SHOULD go ahead of you. We are trying to fit in our trips around our jobs. You guys are trying to fit in your trips around shuffle board tournaments.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 04-24-2011, 06:04 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,905
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
You are not getting the jist. Maybe it is the old age.... You GET 8 HIGH PRIORITY VACATION PASSES A YEAR. If you are traveling more than that then the regular employees SHOULD go ahead of you. We are trying to fit in our trips around our jobs. You guys are trying to fit in your trips around shuffle board tournaments.
But now they just play their shuffle board on the Wii. No need to retire to FL even.
EWRflyr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hjflyer
United
8
08-19-2010 01:16 PM
ERJFO
Regional
8
11-30-2009 10:39 AM
CAL EWR
Major
14
09-27-2007 06:36 AM
FlyByNite
Cargo
3
04-17-2007 03:05 AM
RockBottom
Major
15
07-05-2006 08:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices