Pass Travel Survey
#121
Look, I have absolutely nothing against retiree's but at CAL, (and apparently every other airline out there), that isn't how it is done.
I'm dead set against retiree's having any priority at all above active employees but you did get vacation passes so I'll live with it and so should you.
#122
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
I don't know what other airlines do. I just know they (retirees) earned their seniority, just like WE are doing now and I have something intrinsically against taking someones seniority away. I'm an old schooler who HAS seen the airlines in general diminish the idea of seniority by building in many little protective devices for the sake of being more warm and fuzzy. It's just that with each little "warm and fuzzy" they build in, they are in fact "restricting seniority". So I know by now, seniority has taken on a different meaning than it used to be. So be it, I will in fact live with it. Take care.
#123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
I'm an old schooler who HAS seen the airlines in general diminish the idea of seniority by building in many little protective devices for the sake of being more warm and fuzzy. It's just that with each little "warm and fuzzy" they build in, they are in fact "restricting seniority". So I know by now, seniority has taken on a different meaning than it used to be. So be it, I will in fact live with it. Take care.
Take care as well,
Scott
Last edited by Scott Stoops; 04-17-2011 at 07:07 AM.
#124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,610
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline does this, why should we?
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline scope is limited to 50 seats, why should we?
Look, I have absolutely nothing against retiree's but at CAL, (and apparently every other airline out there), that isn't how it is done.
Look, I have absolutely nothing against junior guys, but at UAL (and apparently every other airline out there), 50 seat scope isn't how it is done.
I'm dead set against retiree's having any priority at all above active employees but you did get vacation passes so I'll live with it and so should you.
I'm dead set against junior guys bargaining for scope costing senior guys a few extra dollars, but you will get scope no higher than 70 seats (CRJ-900, EMB-190) so I'll live with it and so should you!
As the ol' saying goes, no other airline scope is limited to 50 seats, why should we?
Look, I have absolutely nothing against retiree's but at CAL, (and apparently every other airline out there), that isn't how it is done.
Look, I have absolutely nothing against junior guys, but at UAL (and apparently every other airline out there), 50 seat scope isn't how it is done.
I'm dead set against retiree's having any priority at all above active employees but you did get vacation passes so I'll live with it and so should you.
I'm dead set against junior guys bargaining for scope costing senior guys a few extra dollars, but you will get scope no higher than 70 seats (CRJ-900, EMB-190) so I'll live with it and so should you!
#125
Touche' and good points but unfortunately doesn't change the landscape of pass benefits as they've been for the last 30 years.
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
I like the idea of working on the same team as management just like you said you liked in your time at Skywest. It can be like playing baseball. We get to be the catcher and management is the pitcher! We can even call the pitch and management if it thinks better can just shake us off. At least everyone will be 'working together'. Perhaps it will help us all 'fly right' as well.
Last edited by intrepidcv11; 04-17-2011 at 02:15 PM.
#127
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Mr. Stoops
Sorry I don’t know how to cut and paste here, I’m a rookie at this.
Well I’ll take mine with some cheese and mustard.
I guess I was being too philosophical with too broad a swipe. I wasn’t referring to the Pilots’ contract specifically; I’m not even familiar with its intricacies. I was referring to all the airlines and all the unions over time. I was wondering why so many seem to think (or not) that it’s OK to strip away someones (retirees in this case) seniority. And I can only presume it’s because they’ve become accustomed to it (seniority restrictions) in so many little ways they have been desensitized.
I better add here that it’s not all presumption; I am somewhat familiar with some contracts at some airlines and familiar with other contracts going back to ’65.
Again, look what happens when we allow “them” to produce groups. They are us and we are them (or will be). There should be no groups.
Sorry I don’t know how to cut and paste here, I’m a rookie at this.
Well I’ll take mine with some cheese and mustard.
I guess I was being too philosophical with too broad a swipe. I wasn’t referring to the Pilots’ contract specifically; I’m not even familiar with its intricacies. I was referring to all the airlines and all the unions over time. I was wondering why so many seem to think (or not) that it’s OK to strip away someones (retirees in this case) seniority. And I can only presume it’s because they’ve become accustomed to it (seniority restrictions) in so many little ways they have been desensitized.
I better add here that it’s not all presumption; I am somewhat familiar with some contracts at some airlines and familiar with other contracts going back to ’65.
Again, look what happens when we allow “them” to produce groups. They are us and we are them (or will be). There should be no groups.
#128
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Early out/ Retiree
Posts: 20
You think only CAL folks wanted this changed? I'm UAL and I wanted it changed. Pretty much everyone I talked to from ual wanted it changed.
You say you can "gaurantee" of being underrepresented. The provide that fact since you can make a gaurantee. When the majority wanted it changed to reflect common industry practice what did you expect?
If you take more than 8 trips then you will then have to suffer with the new policy. Otherwise sounds like a win. You could trump another retiree senior to you if you were on vacation pass and they weren't. However, I am guessing you will not accept your better boarding priority and let them ride ahead of you since you prefer the current system.
L
You say you can "gaurantee" of being underrepresented. The provide that fact since you can make a gaurantee. When the majority wanted it changed to reflect common industry practice what did you expect?
If you take more than 8 trips then you will then have to suffer with the new policy. Otherwise sounds like a win. You could trump another retiree senior to you if you were on vacation pass and they weren't. However, I am guessing you will not accept your better boarding priority and let them ride ahead of you since you prefer the current system.
L
#129
You are not getting the jist. Maybe it is the old age.... You GET 8 HIGH PRIORITY VACATION PASSES A YEAR. If you are traveling more than that then the regular employees SHOULD go ahead of you. We are trying to fit in our trips around our jobs. You guys are trying to fit in your trips around shuffle board tournaments.
#130
You are not getting the jist. Maybe it is the old age.... You GET 8 HIGH PRIORITY VACATION PASSES A YEAR. If you are traveling more than that then the regular employees SHOULD go ahead of you. We are trying to fit in our trips around our jobs. You guys are trying to fit in your trips around shuffle board tournaments.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post