Search

Notices

HDQTRS in ORD........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2011, 02:08 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default

I think there are HOOTERs restaurants in all of those cities. Oh, wait it says HDQRTS, nevermind.
N9373M is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 02:10 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Not Denver. The way I connect the dots UAL has minimal long term interest in Denver.
How do you figure?

It's possibly the most efficient airport in the country, and still has room to more than double its current capacity.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:31 AM
  #23  
I love my job!
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: B757 Capt
Posts: 276
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
How do you figure?

It's possibly the most efficient airport in the country, and still has room to more than double its current capacity.
Why not? CAL used to have its HQ in Denver. It would just like the good old days before Audrey.
Boneman is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 07:43 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

1. We've done nothing but shrink in Denver, it's an expensive airport.

2. We've given a ton of our feed to the RJs.

3. United's RJ end of the concourse is a cramped, noisy, dirty disgrace, much like the F-Con in ORD. We're surely losing passengers to SWA and FRNT as a result.

4. No SWA passenger ever flew on an RJ. And FRNT's Airbi are even more comfortable than a guppy. PAX with no interest in loyalty programs will book a flight on a larger plane ten times before they'll book one on an RJ. I see steady passenger erosion as a result. Color me pessimist.

4. If fuel continues it's wild swings (and why won't it?) then eventually FNRT will succomb to SWA. They have been down to a few days operating cash how many times in the last 5 years?? SWA loves to move in, pick the low lying fruit and position themselves to feast on the carcass. Think BWI. This will allow them to increase their mass and that's not good for UAL/DEN.

5. International flying is best done from cities closer to the coasts. I recall reading that Tilton and Smisek have said that UAL wants to expand international ops. I can't see that in happening in DEN with EWR, IAD, LAX, HOU and SFO next to water, and ORD in the middle. Plus, United used to serve another (tiny) International airport in the New York area which could handle some EWR overflow. Nah...what am I smoking?

I hope I'm wrong. That's just the way I see it. Others smarter than I have already opined on this topic on the old board. Perhaps they will add their two cents.

Last edited by oldmako; 02-04-2011 at 07:56 AM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 08:07 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
See, that's the difference between you and I. You couldn't give a rats ass, whereas I do. When they spend an absolute fortune moving our ops from IAH to ORD, then you'll complain there's no money left for YOU to get that nice hefty pay raise. I'm just wondering why we have to shut our ops down and move everything to one of the most expensive places around. So far about the ONLY thing we're keeping is our paint job. Merger of "equals"? Hardly...
Again....it doesnt matter where they put ops or HDQ. Someone and something would have to be moved to accomodate the size of the new UAL.

They would have to spend a fortune to move it all to IAH. So whats the difference?
C11DCA is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:59 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
1. We've done nothing but shrink in Denver, it's an expensive airport.

2. We've given a ton of our feed to the RJs.

3. United's RJ end of the concourse is a cramped, noisy, dirty disgrace, much like the F-Con in ORD. We're surely losing passengers to SWA and FRNT as a result.

4. No SWA passenger ever flew on an RJ. And FRNT's Airbi are even more comfortable than a guppy. PAX with no interest in loyalty programs will book a flight on a larger plane ten times before they'll book one on an RJ. I see steady passenger erosion as a result. Color me pessimist.

4. If fuel continues it's wild swings (and why won't it?) then eventually FNRT will succomb to SWA. They have been down to a few days operating cash how many times in the last 5 years?? SWA loves to move in, pick the low lying fruit and position themselves to feast on the carcass. Think BWI. This will allow them to increase their mass and that's not good for UAL/DEN.

5. International flying is best done from cities closer to the coasts. I recall reading that Tilton and Smisek have said that UAL wants to expand international ops. I can't see that in happening in DEN with EWR, IAD, LAX, HOU and SFO next to water, and ORD in the middle. Plus, United used to serve another (tiny) International airport in the New York area which could handle some EWR overflow. Nah...what am I smoking?

I hope I'm wrong. That's just the way I see it. Others smarter than I have already opined on this topic on the old board. Perhaps they will add their two cents.
6. Take a look at the amount of O& D traffic out of den.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 10:36 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by strfyr51
Because THAT'S the Deal that Jeff BOUGHT! Didn't you READ the Aviation week article? He SAID it was the Deal TILTON offered him "Take it or LEAVE IT", There WAS no Negotiation
Sounds like the way the JNC needs to put scope at the table. Invite Jeff into the room and lay it out just like that.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 10:40 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
3. United's RJ end of the concourse is a cramped, noisy, dirty disgrace, much like the F-Con in ORD. We're surely losing passengers to SWA and FRNT as a result.
See it is a merger of equals! You just described the Express terminals in EWR (Terminal A) and IAH (Terminal B). We bring two disasters to the table as well.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 12:13 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Father Guido,

Are you saying that there is plenty of it, or a lack of plenty? Seems to me that O&D would be a dwindling enterprise and that our mass is propping the loads up. But, I'm a guy with a half empty glass of bourbon in front of me, as opposed to one half full.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-04-2011, 01:20 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Father Guido,

Are you saying that there is plenty of it, or a lack of plenty? Seems to me that O&D would be a dwindling enterprise and that our mass is propping the loads up. But, I'm a guy with a half empty glass of bourbon in front of me, as opposed to one half full.
Aye my Henry Mck swill loving son. The Denver O & D traffic from what I've read is not that great.

I assume you are living the chaste life of the three B's........Bourbon, Boats, and Beeyotches.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetpilot26
Hangar Talk
3
06-25-2010 06:35 PM
bgmann
Major
14
03-04-2008 05:28 PM
otter
Regional
16
09-05-2007 01:11 PM
supercell86
Regional
17
04-06-2007 09:00 AM
Skygirl
Hangar Talk
6
05-04-2006 05:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices