Search

Notices

Scope and the JCBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2012, 05:14 PM
  #211  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default JCBA got SCOPE????

A Picture speaks a 1000 words......

SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 05:35 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: Cap'n
Posts: 687
Default

I am outside looking in, does anyone think a "Delta +1" JCBA would get passed at the new UAL?
workingforfree is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 06:37 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

That's making a judgement based on one page of a several hundred page document. Hell no.
oldmako is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:40 AM
  #214  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by 1257
True.

This?



Or this? It's up to us.



The key is we have to purge this psychological fallacy that we have to give up something in negotiations to get scope.
UAL can make just as much, if not more, with newer gen. 737's on most routes as they can with 70-100 seat RJ's.
The idea of givebacks to maintain scope plays right into mgmt's. plans for something
they were in the process of accomplishing anyway as the economy and loads improve going forward.
Southwest can do it. In fact they can do it with two larger-than-RJ types now.
That's mgmt's. job to figure out how, not ours. We need to stop playing armchair managers and simply fight for our profession.
It's simply a must to maintain scope with no concessions for it.
Maybe it's time some of us (if not ALL of us) go back and look at some old threads~
horrido27 is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 12:30 PM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

which region, specifically are these 900 nautical mile RJ's limited to?

They should be Trans-Regional-Outsourcing-Professionkilling-jets

I thought ALPA was against outsourcing?

Why did they aprove this TA language?
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:15 PM
  #216  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Please keep it simple guys.
Nothing more than 50-seat aircraft (not just jets) outsourced. Period.

Signed,
An 8-year xjet Capt, that-can't-wait-to-move-on
HVAA is offline  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:33 PM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Guppy Capt.
Posts: 1,887
Default

Originally Posted by HVAA
Please keep it simple guys.
Nothing more than 50-seat aircraft (not just jets) outsourced. Period.

Signed,
An 8-year xjet Capt, that-can't-wait-to-move-on
Cat's already out of the bag. IF the TA gets turned down for scope, the arbitrator will say that DAL has it, so why can't UAL, or any other company...

Plus, to many guys are seeing $$$$ now, so they aren't really looking at scope.
Short Bus Drive is offline  
Old 11-30-2012, 04:46 AM
  #218  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 71
Default

I realize my hopes of improving scope is fantasy, but at least I support it...as an express guy.
HVAA is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:27 PM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
Cat's already out of the bag. IF the TA gets turned down for scope, the arbitrator will say that DAL has it, so why can't UAL, or any other company...

Plus, to many guys are seeing $$$$ now, so they aren't really looking at scope.
The arbitrator won't know why it was turned down. He won't know how 12,000 pilots voted. ALPA polling data is confidential. It won't be shown to the "MEDIATOR" because it would then be leaked to management. it tells people like Zullo how to get to 50 percent plus one. So.......no, the MEDIATOR won't know anything about that.

The scope clause at one company cannot be "cherry picked" without considering the totality of the deal, and the mediator knows this too. ALPA also knows this. They even discourage MEC and NC members from "cherry picking" becuase it also can negatively impact the other party at the table. If both parties "cherry picked", there would never be a TA on anything.

I firmly disagree with your analyssis.
Ottolillienthal is offline  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:30 PM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
Maybe it's time some of us (if not ALL of us) go back and look at some old threads~

If you are junior now, you'll continue to be junior after this TA.

Management will attrit roughly 800 pilot jobs at mainline due to increases in RJ flying. After the retirements kick in in 2013 we'll all just stay roughly the same because of the increases coming to the regionals.

NICE. The contract that keeps on giving.
Ottolillienthal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices