Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL/CAL ARBITOR ruling submitted on 70 seater >

UAL/CAL ARBITOR ruling submitted on 70 seater

Search

Notices

UAL/CAL ARBITOR ruling submitted on 70 seater

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2010, 08:28 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
avi8tor4life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 378
Default

heck yeah!!!!!
avi8tor4life is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 12:47 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A350
Posts: 193
Default ARBITRATOR rules NO 70+seat jets at CO-UA

lets hope and pray this is the begining of the END of 70 seat RJ's
astrojet is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 03:51 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
meloveboeing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 28
Default

And who said that only CO pilots have a problem with the 70 seat RJ. As a regional pilot I have a problem with it as well. I'd rather be flying the 70 seat RJ for CO.

Happy New Year Simsak! is that how you write his last name? don't even care to look up the correct spelling.

You know where in IAH you have that billboard that says "United agaisnt outsourcing" just as you are turning on JFK? you should put, Happy New Year Simsak.
meloveboeing is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 03:59 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
meloveboeing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
To those duchebags that jumped right in to fly out of IAH to violate CAL's scope...I fart in your general direction...loving it!

It's about time you did something right ALPA!

and that's about all I have to say about that...
hahaha, I second that.

tdys from ORD now to fly the flights that were supposed to be done by the 70s?
meloveboeing is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 04:38 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

and when the integration is completed the ruling is moot - not much risk for the arbitrator here - even for one without gonads like Bloch
mwa1 is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 06:45 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by mwa1
and when the integration is completed the ruling is moot - not much risk for the arbitrator here - even for one without gonads like Bloch
The integration is nearly a year away. So if they want to do it for the time between then and a jcba go ahead. More motivation for the troops!
thor2j is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 06:55 AM
  #27  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by thor2j
The integration is nearly a year away. So if they want to do it for the time between then and a jcba go ahead. More motivation for the troops!
That's what I was thinking, this win gives more power to the JCBA going in favor of COL's current scope clause.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 07:38 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by XJT Pilot
To those duchebags that jumped right in to fly out of IAH to violate CAL's scope...I fart in your general direction...loving it!

It's about time you did something right ALPA!

and that's about all I have to say about that...
Was the ruling limiting to airplanes with more than 50+ seats? or 70+?

If it was 70+ then this ruling is pointless. The RJ's going to CLE, IAH, EWR all have less than 70 seats. In the case or the CRJ-700 2 class,it has 66 seats to be exact.
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 07:43 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Going2Baja's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Driving to work & Looking Left @ the Surf!!
Posts: 727
Default

I thought the issue was w/ 50+ seats. Limiting the 70+ will only get rid of the -900's right? This is a good start, but I would have liked to have seen the line drawn @ 50+.

Baja.
Going2Baja is offline  
Old 12-31-2010, 07:51 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Going2Baja
I thought the issue was w/ 50+ seats. Limiting the 70+ will only get rid of the -900's right? This is a good start, but I would have liked to have seen the line drawn @ 50+.

Baja.
Just found a better discussion going on in the CAL/UAL Merger thread.. it answers this..
JustAMushroom is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices