Search

Notices

New CAL System Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2011, 08:07 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Texandrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 105
Default

It's on our standing bid screen in our crew scheduling system. So you need to Have access to see it. But it's there.

Being on the bottom in Newark I'm looking forward to seeing how this plays out.
Texandrvr is offline  
Old 01-09-2011, 07:53 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by sonnycrockett
Plus why would someone want to fly the Airbus?
Sonny, don't knock it till you've tried it! Beats the HELL out of a guppy! Now, it's not as fun as TMA was I'll allow, but its cool in summer, warm in the winter, roomy and quiet. The tray is overrated, but the ability to cross your legs cannot be overstated!!

Still have the black and gold in the closet?

EDIT...Kept reading and saw that you got to fondle fifi before you left, sorry! Beers on me.
oldmako is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 02:07 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by beeker
So where are the line reductions coming from as they are transferred out to lax? All from cle or are they going to spread the reductions equally.
You would think CLE since LAX would only be open because of Hawaii. Then again I'm sure Fred will be in overdrive trying to figure out how to shrink EWR the standard 5-15% on this bid. Apparently IAH guys must really like spending the night in Elizabeth, NJ.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:13 AM
  #104  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
You would think CLE since LAX would only be open because of Hawaii. Then again I'm sure Fred will be in overdrive trying to figure out how to shrink EWR the standard 5-15% on this bid. Apparently IAH guys must really like spending the night in Elizabeth, NJ.
I'm seriously wondering how this guy continues to cost our company so much money, but isn't being held accountable for it. Just finished my PC after the third attempt due to a lack/shortage of pilots. And he continually says we're "well staffed". Amazing.................
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:28 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
You would think CLE since LAX would only be open because of Hawaii. Then again I'm sure Fred will be in overdrive trying to figure out how to shrink EWR the standard 5-15% on this bid. Apparently IAH guys must really like spending the night in Elizabeth, NJ.
My guess: CLE will get hit the hardest due to the Hawaii flying. All three hubs have lots of flights to LAX, so they may lose some too.

There will be some cross-over flying soon. We will see 737's on "UAL" routes. Some have already been announced. I don't know how much of that will be in a LAX pairing. I'm sure the bid will be the typical "zero growth" bid.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:31 AM
  #106  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
I'm seriously wondering how this guy continues to cost our company so much money, but isn't being held accountable for it. Just finished my PC after the third attempt due to a lack/shortage of pilots. And he continually says we're "well staffed". Amazing.................
We "CAN'T" get rid of Fred??? The 'Friends of Fred' would be without a friend anymore.

Stop your wondering.....The idiot at CAL who lead the charge on $140pb Fuel Hedge 24 months ago (who also has a hand in A-Fund retirement) was rather 'unaffected' in his job security.....Fred's much the same.....par for course.

Miles beyond pathetic & sad.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 06:46 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
My guess: CLE will get hit the hardest due to the Hawaii flying. All three hubs have lots of flights to LAX, so they may lose some too.

There will be some cross-over flying soon. We will see 737's on "UAL" routes. Some have already been announced. I don't know how much of that will be in a LAX pairing. I'm sure the bid will be the typical "zero growth" bid.
Who knows. Talking with a friend of mine, CLE may have gotten all that Hawaii flying but they didn't add a huge number of pilots to account for all of it (something like 15 per seat). Lots of their flying was taken away to make up for it. From what he said, lots of day trips and turns to FL, etc. were shuffled to other bases so now there are more crews laying over in CLE than there were before. Not as bad as crews laying over in EWR because of that messed up bid. He indicated talking to the office there in CLE that they don't anticipate a big hit in staffing for now if Hawaii flying is shifted but then again until the bid comes out it is all speculation. There was something in the conversation too about more north-south west coast flying in the works for when the LAX base finally got the go ahead.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 08:35 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
There was something in the conversation too about more north-south west coast flying in the works for when the LAX base finally got the go ahead.
Reminds me of the flying UAL's Shuttle did until they parked the fleet.
boxer6 is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 09:37 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by boxer6
Reminds me of the flying UAL's Shuttle did until they parked the fleet.
Could be CO will pick up or ADD to the 18 rt flights SFO-LAX. OR? Add even more between Lax-PDX or SEA, OAK or,SJC to LAX, BUR,ONT,and SAN?? PLenty of Room for expansion! That will feed the LAX-HNL or LAX east flights since I DOUBT they'll ever cut back at LAX and build it into the superhub it should be. What do we have there now 3 terminals?? A full course of Asia/Pacific flights?? The Combined UAL is going to be a Monster at LAX!! Heck! that's pretty good news even IF it's a rumour!
strfyr51 is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 10:19 AM
  #110  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by strfyr51
What do we have there now 3 terminals??
If you consider "WE", the 'Out-Sourced' (a'la SkyWest) flying that occupies one of those 3 complete terminal's you refer too.....then I guess your sum of 3 is correct. I know several other's would differ in your 'math'. Terminal 6 & 7 yes....but sure as heck not 8....just a 'few' RJ's there, look into it.

Got SCOPE??

Originally Posted by strfyr51
The Combined UAL is going to be a Monster at LAX!! Heck! that's pretty good news even IF it's a rumour!
You obtain a bit of redemption....you would be correct as to LAX having the 'potential' to be a Monster out West. For those that may not realize/remember, CAL still has multiple pieces of Real-Estate at LAX left from the "Six Days".....So yes, the potential is there with resources in place.

As far as the previous 'up-down' the West Coast routes like years past, stating the obvious, the demographic/saturation of our industry have change completly. JB, VA, SWA to name a few have dilluted the 'straight' West Coast Market.....but a feed/route structure used wisely in a racheted-up the LAX Hub for Asia/S Pacific/South America.....we could improved our batting average very quickly and go head-head with DAL.

.....Jeffery, hear that??? The "potential" is there.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeB525
Major
14
06-25-2011 01:30 AM
Rocketiii
United
55
12-23-2010 01:24 AM
ERJ Jay
Union Talk
0
10-03-2009 10:33 AM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices