Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
What to do about Contract Violation >

What to do about Contract Violation

Search

Notices

What to do about Contract Violation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2010, 06:05 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Well, they are fighting this and have demanded an arbitration over the issue. Both sides are going to go in and argue their position and the arbitrator will decide who is right regarding the scope interpretation. So, if the arbitrator decides for the company, you are going to blame Jay Pierce and ALPA. If the arbitrator decides for CAL ALPA in this matter, will you give credit for them doing something to protect our contract? Something tell me you won't.
Thank you for making it so simple for even me to understand! You must really think I am stupid. Yes, I know this will go to arbitration. My question is, does ALPA understand why the company wants this to go to arbitration? The company is going to continue to push our buttons to get a reaction. They want us fighting over everything. That way we can't concentrate on the task(s) at hand. No, I will not blame Pierce for the decision, one way or the other. Whatever the arbitrator says goes. They should be smart enough to read the contract. The company, on the other hand, will continue to take advantage of every loop hole ever thought of. The point I was making is simple... Pierce has not shown one iota of spine when it came to the last contract. ALPA has caved in on just about everything. Why should Pierce or ALPA start now? Pierce needs to go...so does ALPA. They both had their chances to prove their worth. We have done nothing but go backwards.

Bph320 said...

"Don't worry. ALPA National is looking out for our best interests."

Oh really! You have got to be kidding. Give me a list of what ALPA has accomplished in the last 10 years. Our best interests are last on their list.
Skybo is offline  
Old 11-22-2010, 05:16 AM
  #162  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by Skybo
...... We have done nothing but go backwards.

Bph320 said...

"Don't worry. ALPA National is looking out for our best interests."


Oh really! You have got to be kidding. Give me a list of what ALPA has accomplished in the last 10 years. Our best interests are last on their list.
Don't worry, in two years when 65 retirements start up they will be telling you, "look how fast your career is moving up!". That is until they sell more scope to the lowest bidder.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 11-27-2010, 06:54 AM
  #163  
Line Holder
 
Bph320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 50
Default

Obviously when I said ALPA is looking out for our best interests some thought I was actually serious. Sarcasm is sometimes doesn't come across in writing. I am not too thrilled about ALPA. They have proven long ago that as far as ALPA National is concerned, UAL pilots are on their own. They wrote us off with no assistance during 2003 while giving NWA and Delta financial help during their chapter 11 process. ALPA's big pitch for everyone being in the same association is so that if one group goes on strike they can rely on all other ALPA carriers for Strike Assessment assistance. Now ALPA doesn't have to start writing strike assistant checks until a pilot group is out for 30 days. Then they have to go get money from everyone else. Now how many days was the 1985 UAL strike? 29 days! I wonder why? ALPA could not afford to assist 5000 UAL pilots then. What is the likelihood they can support 10 ,000? I believe we need our own representation ASAP. We are in a custody battle for OUR domestic flying and we are relying on our spouses attorney to represent us. ALPA does not support our best interests. I dont need my union representing the express side of the debate.
Im sure I have just ****ed off a few fundamentalist extremist ALPA die hards. For them criticizing the union is like criticizing Islam. I better be careful, my car might get vandalized.

Last edited by Bph320; 11-27-2010 at 09:01 AM.
Bph320 is offline  
Old 11-27-2010, 08:09 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainNameless
This is spot on. For the most part, I think he is an idiot, but there was an eye-opening report published a few months ago by Boyd, the guy who projects the direction of the airline business landscape. If you read his stuff, he makes a very good case that it is going to become far more expensive for majors to run things under the current Major/Regional system because the cost savings are nowhere near as much as they were for the past 20 years. For example, from the perspective of a SCUMBAG AIRLINE MANAGER, would it be cheaper to pay regional carriers who have a growing cancer of 10-15 year employees or to bring those routes back to mainline, re-hire the now unemployed regional pilots as new hires, and have them fly the same routes they were flying before but with a big pay cut and 2-3 weeks less vacation than they have now?

So, SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT is pulling this ruse to get everyone to believe they really want to continue the current set-up as is. What really is going on is the SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT is looking for a lesser JCBA in order to "surrender" something to mainline pilots that they already intend to surrender anyway. They want every mainline pilot to pay a price to head the industry in a direction that they (SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT) already know makes sense for industry to head.

Almost makes your head spin what a mind-**** this actually is.
************************************************** *****
that's the BEST analogy I've seen Yet! Tilton is a Brilliant "ALL about Money" Man, and Smisek is reportedly a Brilliant Lawyer. Does anyone Believe for ONE Minute they didn't already have this "cooked up"?? Makes you Winder WHY 2 General Counsel VP's have decided to Leave UAL in the past few months doesn't it?? Both with Weak excuses like "My Daughter didn't want to move to Chicago" and "Uprooting my Life was Unfair to my Family" Oh "Boo Hoo" Could it be they left bacuse the "Skulduggery" to BECOME was too much for them to BEAR???
strfyr51 is offline  
Old 11-28-2010, 06:00 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,579
Default

Do tell what financial help NWA received during our gang rape?

Originally Posted by Bph320
Obviously when I said ALPA is looking out for our best interests some thought I was actually serious. Sarcasm is sometimes doesn't come across in writing. I am not too thrilled about ALPA. They have proven long ago that as far as ALPA National is concerned, UAL pilots are on their own. They wrote us off with no assistance during 2003 while giving NWA and Delta financial help during their chapter 11 process. ALPA's big pitch for everyone being in the same association is so that if one group goes on strike they can rely on all other ALPA carriers for Strike Assessment assistance. Now ALPA doesn't have to start writing strike assistant checks until a pilot group is out for 30 days. Then they have to go get money from everyone else. Now how many days was the 1985 UAL strike? 29 days! I wonder why? ALPA could not afford to assist 5000 UAL pilots then. What is the likelihood they can support 10 ,000? I believe we need our own representation ASAP. We are in a custody battle for OUR domestic flying and we are relying on our spouses attorney to represent us. ALPA does not support our best interests. I dont need my union representing the express side of the debate.
Im sure I have just ****ed off a few fundamentalist extremist ALPA die hards. For them criticizing the union is like criticizing Islam. I better be careful, my car might get vandalized.
NERD is offline  
Old 11-28-2010, 06:49 AM
  #166  
Line Holder
 
Bph320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 50
Default

My understanding is ALPA gave your MEC a check for a strike fund to he tune o a few million. If hat is not the case then I stand corrected on that fragment of my statement.
Bph320 is offline  
Old 11-29-2010, 01:44 PM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
throttleweenie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: A-320 Capt
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by Golden Bear
Be sure to deny the entire pre-merger UAL pilot-group who negotiated and voted for a contract that allowed such UEX flying in the first place. You know, the only ones in this whole drama who could have prevented this flying.

That'll show 'em.
I don't believe denying anyone a jumpseat is the solution. I do believe that United pilots again flying routes that were replaced by Express is the solution, and if a particular route is best served by a small jet, I believe it should be flown by United pilots. The means to the end is that UA would eventually grow and prosper, and when they start hiring again, you'd be interviewed for a pilot position.

TW
throttleweenie is offline  
Old 11-29-2010, 04:53 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
I don't believe denying anyone a jumpseat is the solution. I do believe that United pilots again flying routes that were replaced by Express is the solution, and if a particular route is best served by a small jet, I believe it should be flown by United pilots. The means to the end is that UA would eventually grow and prosper, and when they start hiring again, you'd be interviewed for a pilot position.
I guess sarcasm does not translate well on the internet.

That post was meant to be taken in jest.
Golden Bear is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Aviation Law
4
09-04-2008 01:09 PM
VictorFoxCharli
Foreign
13
07-18-2008 09:43 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices