Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
What to do about Contract Violation >

What to do about Contract Violation

Search

Notices

What to do about Contract Violation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2010, 10:57 AM
  #91  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Very good point!
No its not. See my post above.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 10:59 AM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Thanks for pointing this out, I will ask my LEC rep about this! If it is a violation (or anywhere close) to our scope then we SHOULD be raising hell! I honestly don't know the answer since we haven't had to deal with large Turbo Props.

FWIW, you ALWAYS have the right to complain when you're contract is being violated. You win some and lose some, but it's always a lengthy process to get resolution. A 'win' could give extra leverage for other things.... A loss could backfire and make the contractual fix more costly... Or the entire issue may be OBE.
Nope. See my post above as well. The flight is a CAL flight out of CLE. If it was a UAL flight out of ORD, we'd have a problem. THAT is what is being done with the Skywest flying out of IAH. Opening a crew base and doing it as CAL flying.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 11:00 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
The fact is that the company is operating within United's scope clause by operating the Skywest 70 seaters, and the company is within Continental's scope clause by operating the Colgan 76 seaters.
Wouldn't that also imply, by extension, that the company is violating the A++ JV agreement (which it isn't) because they're two separate companies? There is no more revenue sharing or conflict with CAL's contract, because it's one holding company. Now that the holding company receives the profits from both the Colgan and Skywest flying, they would seem to move from "code share" to "complementary carrier" status in both contracts. It doesn't make sense that they should be able to say, on one hand, the A++ JV restrictions no longer apply because it's one company, not a joint venture, then turn around and claim the Skywest flying doesn't violate CALs contract, and the Colgan flying doesn't violate UALs contract because they're separate companies. Then again, I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express, so I'll let the union lawyers argue their case.
XHooker is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 02:34 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 737 capt
Posts: 335
Default

I think this whole deal is that company is trying to get us to pay to stop something they know they have no right to do. Don't fall for it MECs.
ron kent is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 04:12 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
That being said, I do think you too are ready to pull the trigger when your MEC sends out the marching orders. The other half of your MEC, United, has publically cautioned your MEC. That tells me even they have reservations about the validity of whether or not this is a violation....Wendy isn't a fan of us and would take glee in joining the attack on us. I suspect they have looked at this as I have and don't see the violation.
Swing and a miss. Great read into a completely unrelated topic there Joe. Ever think about working for FOX News? You are a great reader of mainline MEC psychology. Then again you have been to Herndon...
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:34 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Swing and a miss. Great read into a completely unrelated topic there Joe. Ever think about working for FOX News? You are a great reader of mainline MEC psychology. Then again you have been to Herndon...
OK, since you asked.....Here is my opinion based on my ALPA experience...

ALPA is complicent with management in creating this mess.

Randy Babbitt told me and admitted in an interview with AirInc. that it was a mistake to allow the outsourcing of turboprop flying. He said that the Eastern MEC was approached about the outsourcing of regional turboprop flying to cities like MCN, CSG, ABY, VLD, etc....The Eastern MEC wasn't interested in flying Beech 99s and Metros...Mistake number one by the elitist mainline folks....

Early 90's, the RJ comes around....starts replacing TPs on some routes...No problem, it only seats 50 people....We don't care and we don't want to fly "little jets"....Mistake number two by the elitist mainline folks....

Mid 90's, Air Willy, ASA, and BisEx start flying Bae146s.....Mainline pilots start to take notice for the first time...A day late and a dollar short....They try to use scope as a remote control to control size of aircraft...Mistake number three by the elitest mainline pilots...

When I got hired by ASA in 1994, it only took 2 years for a senior ASA captain to make parity at a mainline carrier....Now it takes about 5 to 6 years....Many of us have now made a career at the "regionals" because ALPA and the mainline pilots were too good to fly "little airplanes"....

Fast forward to this current "emergency"...Remember, a failure on YOUR part does not constitute an emergency on my part...Now due to YOUR failures on scope issues, you decide to attack junior Skywest pilots...many of which will be furloughed United pilots....Sorry, but that dog won't hunt with me....The first Skywest pilot who is denied the jumpseat, will result in me denying every CAL and UAL pilot the jumpseat....You decide, but be careful with your decision..
JoeMerchant is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:19 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fero's
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
The other half of your MEC, United, has publically cautioned your MEC. That tells me even they have reservations about the validity of whether or not this is a violation....Wendy isn't a fan of us and would take glee in joining the attack on us. I suspect they have looked at this as I have and don't see the violation.
Can you point us to a source for this statement?

I hope it's not the post someone put up earlier that was out of context.
chuckyt1 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:29 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1
Can you point us to a source for this statement?

I hope it's not the post someone put up earlier that was out of context.
Sorry Chucky...hard to keep all the nasty comments between your two MECs straight...Sounds like things are getting nasty between you two...Maybe you should patch things up with your fellow pilots before you go after the junior Skywest pilots for a problem YOU and your fellow mainline pilots created......
JoeMerchant is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:40 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
OK, since you asked.....Here is my opinion based on my ALPA experience...
Actually I didn't ask for your opinon. You are a career regional capt which means you went through two big hiring cycles yet stayed right where you are now. That makes any of your opinions on CAL-UAL MEC matters about as relevant as a drunk @hole in the stands at a Buffalo Bills game...
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:51 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Actually I didn't ask for your opinon. You are a career regional capt which means you went through two big hiring cycles yet stayed right where you are now. That makes any of your opinions on CAL-UAL MEC matters about as relevant as a drunk @hole in the stands at a Buffalo Bills game...
Actually intrepidcv, this is the 3rd downturn in this industry since I jumped in...Gulf War 1, 911/Dot.com bubble, and the current downturn....Everything considered, I'm doing better than many who jumped on the "two big hiring cycles" you speak of....

You and/or your predecessors sold this flying to protect the senior mainline pilots...Sorry it's mine now and I will do whatever I need to do to protect it....you do what you need to and I will do what I need to do......

Ray Charles could have seen this train wreck coming....Too bad some of you are just now seeing it.....
JoeMerchant is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Aviation Law
4
09-04-2008 01:09 PM
VictorFoxCharli
Foreign
13
07-18-2008 09:43 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices