Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
NO JCBA until at least END of October. >

NO JCBA until at least END of October.

Search

Notices

NO JCBA until at least END of October.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2010, 06:06 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,905
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
What many of us are overlooking.....In order for Jeff and the New UAL to execute all the talked about "synergies" that the investors will be wanting to see/promised by way of this merger, they (the company & it's shareholders) WILL need to have a Pilot Group JCBA (and SLI) completed to deliver the numbers touted during the pre-merger talk/propaganda. The ball's in their court to a certain extent....If there are 'large'/lucrative 'synergies' to be had as the talking heads have touched on, then we (the NEW Pilot Group) have skin in the deal to share in it's payout's via the new/lucrative JCBA.

The pieces are in place.....be patient & let the game play out. Not discounting the importance of this JCBA for the NEW Pilot group, but I for one STILL like our present position in the 'game'.
I agree for the most part, but don't forget the whole USAirways debacle. Every merger brings alleged synergies to the table, but US still hasn't realized theirs in full. Remember that VP Fred "I'm Helping Make Your Commute Easier" said in the Flight Ops Propaganda that CAL/UAL didn't have to have this done to realize synergies using US as an example.

I will agree that this is mainly their pilots' fault preventing a full consummation of the marriage over there. The ball was in their court and the pretty much blew that. Hence, doing the JCBA first over here makes our position in the game a better one.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 06:50 AM
  #12  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
I agree for the most part, but don't forget the whole USAirways debacle. Every merger brings alleged synergies to the table, but US still hasn't realized theirs in full. Remember that VP Fred "I'm Helping Make Your Commute Easier" said in the Flight Ops Propaganda that CAL/UAL didn't have to have this done to realize synergies using US as an example.

I will agree that this is mainly their pilots' fault preventing a full consummation of the marriage over there. The ball was in their court and the pretty much blew that. Hence, doing the JCBA first over here makes our position in the game a better one.

EWR....

You are absolutely correct on what has become of the USAirways debacle, no arguing there.

On the flip side, why do you think Jay was bombarded for interviews (by the various Financial Analyst/Wall Street Talking Heads/and big time investment firms) during the Court-Ship of this entire merger??? They needed/wanted to know where his Pilot Group stood in this Merger (I'm sure Wendy had the same over at UAL). Wall Street has seen first hand by way of the "Charlie Fox" at USAirways, and enesence, this 5 yr debacle has prevented the company from delivering what they had 'promised' investor first hand from the start.....Financial Benefit of the two airlines coming together. It was just within the last 2 months that even USAirways Mgt has asked for legal help/intervention by the Gov to get this mess figured so that 'they' can reap the 'synergies' that they promised from the start. http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2010/07/26/daily17.html

When looking at what has happened at USAirways for the last 5+ yrs, I would say that even though approval was given and things are in full swing, the Financial World (and even the Gov) has/will be looking at our Merger with a bit more of a critical eye on delivering what our Mgt has promised it's investors by way of 'huge' economic synergies.

Just one man's take, but your point is understood as well.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 09-26-2010, 08:06 AM
  #13  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
I know the info from the Union has been sparse, but let's look at the information first before we get our panties in a bunch.


  1. Do you think the company can respond to our financial proposals if they don't even know each other's financials?
We haven't presented financial proposals yet; CAL/UAL ALPA are at an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates and the affect such a move would have on SLI.
A320fumes is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 06:40 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,905
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
EWR....

You are absolutely correct on what has become of the USAirways debacle, no arguing there.

On the flip side, why do you think Jay was bombarded for interviews (by the various Financial Analyst/Wall Street Talking Heads/and big time investment firms) during the Court-Ship of this entire merger??? They needed/wanted to know where his Pilot Group stood in this Merger (I'm sure Wendy had the same over at UAL). Wall Street has seen first hand by way of the "Charlie Fox" at USAirways, and enesence, this 5 yr debacle has prevented the company from delivering what they had 'promised' investor first hand from the start.....Financial Benefit of the two airlines coming together. It was just within the last 2 months that even USAirways Mgt has asked for legal help/intervention by the Gov to get this mess figured so that 'they' can reap the 'synergies' that they promised from the start. http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2010/07/26/daily17.html

When looking at what has happened at USAirways for the last 5+ yrs, I would say that even though approval was given and things are in full swing, the Financial World (and even the Gov) has/will be looking at our Merger with a bit more of a critical eye on delivering what our Mgt has promised it's investors by way of 'huge' economic synergies.

Just one man's take, but your point is understood as well.
I totally agree with you. As it wasn't too long after the commuter friendly VP came out with that drivel that USAirways went to court saying they can't fully realize the synergies. Found that ironic and perfect timing for us. Thus, I do believe we have better leverage going forward. Wall Street and the financial analysts will be watching closely and putting pressure on as necessary to get this hammered out ASAP.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 09:31 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates
What is a B-747 BES ??
skypest is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 10:04 AM
  #16  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by skypest
what is a b-747 bes ??
BES......
Base
Equipment
Seat
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 07:47 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by skypest
What is a B-747 BES ??
Skypest,

Its amazing what a homeless pilot will do for $20 isn't it?
Fritzthepilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 07:50 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
We haven't presented financial proposals yet; CAL/UAL ALPA are at an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates and the affect such a move would have on SLI.
Edumacate us please. Why would the Whale pay rates produce an impasse?
Fritzthepilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2010, 09:16 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Edumacate us please. Why would the Whale pay rates produce an impasse?

During the SLI arbitration, it could be argued that since the whale pays more in that scenario instead of the same as the 777 (which both groups have), the career expectations are higher and Former UAL pilots could get better placement on the combined list.

So the theory goes. As to whether that is a legit argument or fear, who knows?
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Old 09-28-2010, 09:13 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SUPERfluf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis
During the SLI arbitration, it could be argued that since the whale pays more in that scenario instead of the same as the 777 (which both groups have), the career expectations are higher and Former UAL pilots could get better placement on the combined list.

So the theory goes. As to whether that is a legit argument or fear, who knows?
If the CAL merger committee chairman didn't think it was a big deal then the CAL MEC wouldn't make a big deal out of it.
SUPERfluf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nosmo King
Mergers and Acquisitions
31
01-05-2009 09:59 AM
jsfBoat
Hangar Talk
5
09-13-2008 07:35 AM
RockBottom
Major
3
03-16-2006 05:38 AM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
3
10-20-2005 08:39 AM
Sir James
Money Talk
2
09-30-2005 07:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices