Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Combined UAL/CAL may use CAL PBS bidding >

Combined UAL/CAL may use CAL PBS bidding

Search

Notices

Combined UAL/CAL may use CAL PBS bidding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2010, 02:54 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

After working on both systems, hands down the Jeppesen program has a better solver. When it comes to a PBS vendor the more customization and optimization/solver are what is important. The Jepp product allows you do define it in anyway you want (for the right price of course).

Adopt/Kronos = UAL does a one step process
Carmen/Jeppesen = CAL does a three step process

The three step process allows for a majority of the solve time to be spent on the junior "feasibility" group.

When you talk about comparing the Delta Navtech system it is not a vendor difference it is a bid model difference, and just so you know they are on the market shopping for a new system.

As someone said above don't confuse the product with the work rules placed on it.
El10 is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:15 PM
  #12  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by Rocketiii
Your statements about dynamic bid models and following seniority flies in the face of me disputing 3 months out of 4 how I was forced into a line of time when I bid reserve while junior and senior pilots to me were given reserve and many pilots senior to me would have loved to have my line of time. I have used the system in all regions of the seniority list on all of our aircraft.
Come on now Rocket!!

Please try and keep your 'take' realistic at best. With PBS only being on property at CAL for the last 5 years (or less), I DON'T see how you could have "rid'in" ALL regions of seniority on ALL of our aircraft as you state....doesn't add up! Being super senior on the B777, to going to super junior on the B737 during that period?!? When you say you have 'used' the system in the manner you profess, can't say your claim is totally above the board....that's a 'tall-tail' you tell.

Regardless.....I TOTALLY understand/believe that QOL of is a MAJOR sticking point for any pilot, and our monthly schedule hinges on our PBS monthly awards. Things have to change for the BETTER (Rules/Rigs) in any future JCBA when it comes to PBS.....we both obviously see eye-to-eye on dat!
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:28 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Rocketiii's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by socalguy
come on now rocket!!

Please try and keep your 'take' realistic at best. With pbs only being on property at cal for the last 5 years (or less), i don't see how you could have "rid'in" all regions of seniority on all of our aircraft as you state....doesn't add up! Being super senior on the b777, to going to super junior on the b737 during that period?!? When you say you have 'used' the system in the manner you profess, can't say your claim is totally above the board....that's a 'tall-tail' you tell.

Regardless.....i totally understand/believe that qol of is a major sticking point for any pilot, and our monthly schedule hinges on our pbs monthly awards. Things have to change for the better (rules/rigs) in any future jcba when it comes to pbs.....we both obviously see eye-to-eye on dat!:d
777 fo, 756 fo, 737 ca all at various times in various seniority blocks under pbs. I obviously work with people in every other seniority block. You would be in about a group of 5% that seem to support our current system. Im not knocking that whatsoever, man. To each their own. But I OVERWHELMINGLY work with people who hate OUR system. Yes, most is because of work rules. But again I cant believe the current vendor could implement the correct changes in a timely manner proven by their inability to provided the promised updates of YEARS ago. Also, there are other systems that are more user friendly available and to rubberstamp the current vendor for whatever mysterious reason seems suspicious to me. So I am for a PBS type system. I am completely opposed to the vendor we have and the above reserve bid is proof enough that much of the dissatisfaction comes from the user interface, not just the work rules. But its not personal. You have a yes vote and I have a no vote, and vice versa.

Last edited by Rocketiii; 09-21-2010 at 03:52 PM.
Rocketiii is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:48 PM
  #14  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by luv757
DAL's, as I am to understand so correct me if I am wrong, uses the Prefer Off Saturday, Sunday. Then you put the types of trips you want, then you can put in a line that basically says, Ignore the Sat/Sun line and re-run. This gets you as many trips as it can with Sat/Sun off and if it doesn't have a full line, puts in filler weekend trips.
Yes. You can also alternate your bids if you really want the weekend off, such as:

1. Give me a line with S/S off, if you can't,
2. Give me S/S off as a reserve, if you can't,
3. Give me a line with S/M off, if you can't,
4. Give me S/M off as a reserve, if you can't,
5. Give me a line with F/S off, if you can't,
6. Give me F/S off as a reserve, if you can't,
7. Give me XXXXX

Takes that many lines too.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 03:52 PM
  #15  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by El10
When you talk about comparing the Delta Navtech system it is not a vendor difference it is a bid model difference, and just so you know they are on the market shopping for a new system.

That is for the flight attendants, who are unhappy with Carmen/Jepp, NOT the pilots.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 04:07 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default

The bottom line here is that the Carmen PBS bid system does not honor seniority. You have 20 bid groups, when a bid group is denied you get a failure code.

We have a code, "Line cannot be built due to Overall System Solution Constraints".

This code is telling the pilot that there were trips available to build you a trip for what you asked for and could have been built legally BUT to solve the solution ( the solution is no open time) we had to give your trips to a junior pilot! This happens in the bottom 50% of the whole f.o 737 Iah base.

I had bid group 20 awarded this month, starting in bid group 13 I had OSSC failures. Those trips I wanted were given to jr pilots, whether its needing a Bday party off, commutable trips,, etc, it doesn't matter,

Here is an interesting story that happened at CAL a few months ago.

We have a husband and wife here flying the 737 in IAH. They use the EXACT same bid groups, a few months ago the husbands bid groups got awarded while his wifes failed, yet he is the jr pilot. No legalities for either pilot entering the month BTW.

Their dispute was chalked up as random mistake. Remember here at CAL you are not allowed to see other pilots bid groups, so this happens I'm sure on a monthly basis and we never know!!!

It is frustrating month after month to see what you asked for given to a pilot 20-30% jr to you.
Myboyblue is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 04:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

removed---

Last edited by El10; 09-21-2010 at 05:44 PM.
El10 is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 04:50 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Rocketiii's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by Myboyblue
The bottom line here is that the Carmen PBS bid system does not honor seniority. You have 20 bid groups, when a bid group is denied you get a failure code.

We have a code, "Line cannot be built due to Overall System Solution Constraints".

This code is telling the pilot that there were trips available to build you a trip for what you asked for and could have been built legally BUT to solve the solution ( the solution is no open time) we had to give your trips to a junior pilot! This happens in the bottom 50% of the whole f.o 737 Iah base.

I had bid group 20 awarded this month, starting in bid group 13 I had OSSC failures. Those trips I wanted were given to jr pilots, whether its needing a Bday party off, commutable trips,, etc, it doesn't matter,

Here is an interesting story that happened at CAL a few months ago.

We have a husband and wife here flying the 737 in IAH. They use the EXACT same bid groups, a few months ago the husbands bid groups got awarded while his wifes failed, yet he is the jr pilot. No legalities for either pilot entering the month BTW.

Their dispute was chalked up as random mistake. Remember here at CAL you are not allowed to see other pilots bid groups, so this happens I'm sure on a monthly basis and we never know!!!

It is frustrating month after month to see what you asked for given to a pilot 20-30% jr to you.
Thanks for bringing up the husband and wife team. I forgot to mention that. Not only are they married, but they are a few numbers apart. The system failed in a very obvious and illustrative way. It wasn't until then that the random results of the system could be observed. There is very little an individual pilot can do to dispute verify their results. And bid disputes are usually answered from unknown sources stating "Bid appears correct. Dispute closed". No recourse. I have won two disputes out of 6 filed and was told I could just have what I wanted. So the trips I was awarded that should have been included in the pool for other pilots were not available to them. Then they were tossed into open time after the disputes. The trickle down effect means nothing to the 'committee'.

Also expect the various online forums to have some NEW members that have not previously posted but are 'experts' on PBS and post mainly on the specific topic. This is a known issue right now as the 'guru's try to maintain their cushy PBS jobs with every Thanksgiving and Christmas off.
Rocketiii is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 05:43 PM
  #19  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

PBS is a nightmare. It takes a PHD to get a day off that you want, and then you don't even get it off, but the guy JUNIOR to you does and he didn't even WANT it off. The most JUNIOR B756 pilot in EWR got great lines the last few months and didn't even bid........and hasn't for the past year!!! PBS is junk. It went from general math to quantum physics and continues to get more complicated every month. I wouldn't wish this crap on my worst enemy. Our union sold us this product as being the one item we should welcome with our arms wide open...........and it's done nothing but hose us ever since.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 09-21-2010, 06:16 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

I often wonder how ALPA ever allowed PBS on the property at any airline. It has to save the companies millions at the expense of the crews.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyHigh423
Major
11
05-08-2010 08:28 AM
ERJ Jay
Union Talk
0
10-03-2009 11:33 AM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 10:05 PM
CAL EWR
Major
12
10-28-2007 05:58 PM
CAL EWR
Major
81
07-25-2007 06:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices