UAL MX Flying
#12
Along similar lines, I talked with a CAL FA friend of mine that said the union and company want to have a contract in place by November. I thought she was talking about the COMBINED contract with UA FAs when she said that this was strictly the CAL FA contract to last them until full combination. I guess it has something to do with two different unions. Maybe it is the same for mechanics. Something to help them transition until there is a full combination, a new union election (or choice) and then a combined contract along with seniority.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Posts: 303
Both sides are negotiating seperately but I'd look for the joint contract to be identical in most respects except for the Pension part. Much like you guys will probably have as well. Stay on top of it!! These guys are crafty.
#14
Words of good old greed. We're up in arms when they outsource our flying but we're salivating over the potential of "extremely productive long haul flying" to outsource maintenance? Help me get up to speed cause I must be misunderstanding that theme. I agree with the idea of getting back that flying but not for those reasons...
#15
Along similar lines, I talked with a CAL FA friend of mine that said the union and company want to have a contract in place by November. I thought she was talking about the COMBINED contract with UA FAs when she said that this was strictly the CAL FA contract to last them until full combination. I guess it has something to do with two different unions. Maybe it is the same for mechanics. Something to help them transition until there is a full combination, a new union election (or choice) and then a combined contract along with seniority.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Posts: 303
Not sure if having different unions have much to do with it. UAL flight attendants have taken a different track than the pilots. They're currently negotiating to renew their own individual contract, which they've stipulated is necessary to be completed before they will entertain a joint collective agreement with CAL FA. As far as I know they have yet to acknowledge the marriage of the two companies.
The Flight Attendants have yet to acknowledge ONE company. Pat Friend head of AFA has Long been suspect in my book, especialy after the way she dealt with Lorenzo at Eastern. They negotiated a 10 year contract at Unitedsometime back with NO dicernable Pay raises?? Then had the Temerity to call the rest of us Suckers because we actually THOUGHT we were doing something for the future in getting into the ESOP. In the end She was right. Howsumever, AFA looks out for AFA and they don't do that particularly well where they might be a force to be be considered. It will be interesting to see who comes out in the wash when UAL's and CAL's flight attendants start doing the "Tango"..
#17
Choose your battles wisely
Words of good old greed. We're up in arms when they outsource our flying but we're salivating over the potential of "extremely productive long haul flying" to outsource maintenance? Help me get up to speed cause I must be misunderstanding that theme. I agree with the idea of getting back that flying but not for those reasons...
We have a skill of being able to fly. Let's at least agree to attempt to maximize compensation for the skill we provide. There are no "reasons for getting the flying back" other than GETTING THE FLYING BACK, so I'm not sure what you're alluding to. I didn't come up with the idea of outsourcing, so don't act like I did and don't act like flying the airplane over there is showing support for the decision the management at the airline has made.
I guess I can admit to being "greedy" here so long as you accept the title of foolish. Only if however you define "greedy" as demanding fair compensation for the service I provide to my airline and keeping that flying from being splintered. We'll talk more civilly when you buy an American made T.V. Until then get off your high horse.
#18
************************************************** *******
The Engineering/ Test Pilots fly the Double engine Changes Ferry flights with systems out or Degraded and Daignostic Test flights and system check flights into Overhaul. The Line pilots COULD fly the flights and Maintenence wouldn't mind that either Especially If they were GUARANTEED they would GO!! I've had Line Capt's at United Refuse to fly ferry flights for some inane reasons like the Auopilot was Inop or the Stby Horizon was inop. (If everything was all "PEACHY" then I wouldn't NEED a Ferry flight Now would I??) As if they were doing Us a "favor" in flying them. Contrary to popular belief on this board, Line pilots get FIRST refusal for Ferry,Verification or confirmation flights (At United) as I'm required to ask them for first refusal. I couldn't even get a line Capt to give me a few touch and Go's recently the second capt I asked almost started Drooling to do it. It's NOT like they Can't. Most of them did it in the Military. What the heck is different now?? It's my opinion they should be assigned for a week at a time to be available for ferry flights at the LEAST semi-annually.. And if the Can't or Won't then they shouldn't be FLYING at ALL!! We shouldn't even Need Engineering test pilots. Yet we Do.. Why??
The Engineering/ Test Pilots fly the Double engine Changes Ferry flights with systems out or Degraded and Daignostic Test flights and system check flights into Overhaul. The Line pilots COULD fly the flights and Maintenence wouldn't mind that either Especially If they were GUARANTEED they would GO!! I've had Line Capt's at United Refuse to fly ferry flights for some inane reasons like the Auopilot was Inop or the Stby Horizon was inop. (If everything was all "PEACHY" then I wouldn't NEED a Ferry flight Now would I??) As if they were doing Us a "favor" in flying them. Contrary to popular belief on this board, Line pilots get FIRST refusal for Ferry,Verification or confirmation flights (At United) as I'm required to ask them for first refusal. I couldn't even get a line Capt to give me a few touch and Go's recently the second capt I asked almost started Drooling to do it. It's NOT like they Can't. Most of them did it in the Military. What the heck is different now?? It's my opinion they should be assigned for a week at a time to be available for ferry flights at the LEAST semi-annually.. And if the Can't or Won't then they shouldn't be FLYING at ALL!! We shouldn't even Need Engineering test pilots. Yet we Do.. Why??
I have done quite a few ferry and verification flights, including those where passengers were prohibited. I have no problem with an intentional gear down flight in a three or four engine aircraft, under the right conditions (light weight, short distance, day VFR). I would not do so in a two engine aircraft.
What line pilots have to leave to the flight test pros are things like engine inoperative ferry flights, abnormal flight control or flap configuration flights, or inop hydraulic system flights. There are also times when an aircraft has two seemingly unrelated problems, either one of which I would be willing to fly with, but both together would seem to make it unwise.
Joe
#19
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 4
No Other Airline Does it with Test Pilots
The question still stands, why does ALPA let non-union pilots take their work from them?
No other airline uses non-line holders to do MX. There is nothing they do that requires a management pilot. If you still mistakenly feel that a "Test Pilot" is needed, there are plenty of Union Pilots that are Test Pilots.
No other airline uses non-line holders to do MX. There is nothing they do that requires a management pilot. If you still mistakenly feel that a "Test Pilot" is needed, there are plenty of Union Pilots that are Test Pilots.
#20
The question still stands, why does ALPA let non-union pilots take their work from them?
No other airline uses non-line holders to do MX. There is nothing they do that requires a management pilot. If you still mistakenly feel that a "Test Pilot" is needed, there are plenty of Union Pilots that are Test Pilots.
No other airline uses non-line holders to do MX. There is nothing they do that requires a management pilot. If you still mistakenly feel that a "Test Pilot" is needed, there are plenty of Union Pilots that are Test Pilots.
Are you seriously advocating that line pilots be required (or even allowed) to do engine inoperative ferry flights? No thanks.
Also, these are engineering pilots, not management pilots.
Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfaromeo
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
01-18-2009 09:14 PM