Can someone verify or deny this
05-09-2024, 06:48 PM
#241
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,357
If you don’t have it there’s a reason for that. Contact your reps for guidance pertinent to your airline & don’t worry about ours. There are many things to take away from this thread but none of them are that it’s a good idea to publish information that is not intended for public distribution.
05-09-2024, 07:46 PM
#242
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,803
Ah yes, the “Alex Jones” defense. Hey can you point to me where the 1st amendment protects you ability to slander and libel people who aren’t public figures? Can you show a judge or jury any precedent that a corporation can violate your 1st amendment rights? If you can’t do either of those things (spoiler alert, you can’t) I’d stop spreading potentially wrong information immediately. Or don’t. I don’t care it’ll probably bump my seniority number up a notch!
05-09-2024, 07:54 PM
#243
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,803
05-09-2024, 08:34 PM
#245
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,550
If it touches the UAL pilot on the JS of that flight, in any way, whether they did it directly or employed a second party, that is not defamtion. It's maybe one degree of freedom. The actions of the individual are consequencial regardless, there's a legal term for that. They have no defamtion case at all if in fact they willingly either called themselves, or passed on info to someone else who then acted on that information. How about the SWA crew? How do they fit in to this? Do you think they were wronged here as a result of the action?
05-09-2024, 09:24 PM
#246
Strike averted!
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,800
Do you deny the fact someone called the FAA on the SWA crew?
If it touches the UAL pilot on the JS of that flight, in any way, whether they did it directly or employed a second party, that is not defamtion. It's maybe one degree of freedom. The actions of the individual are consequencial regardless, there's a legal term for that. They have no defamtion case at all if in fact they willingly either called themselves, or passed on info to someone else who then acted on that information. How about the SWA crew? How do they fit in to this? Do you think they were wronged here as a result of the action?
If it touches the UAL pilot on the JS of that flight, in any way, whether they did it directly or employed a second party, that is not defamtion. It's maybe one degree of freedom. The actions of the individual are consequencial regardless, there's a legal term for that. They have no defamtion case at all if in fact they willingly either called themselves, or passed on info to someone else who then acted on that information. How about the SWA crew? How do they fit in to this? Do you think they were wronged here as a result of the action?
05-10-2024, 02:54 AM
#249
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 2
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
