Search

Notices

New WB Captain bids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2024, 08:57 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Is it even worth looking at the snapshots?
It depends. What are you trying to glean from it?
60av8tor is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 09:00 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Is it even worth looking at the snapshots? Given that at any moment, someone serious could add a bid that supersedes a more junior person's bid.. And that there's still almost a week left to go. Right?
not really unless you find it interesting. If you are near the bottom for the first couple days chances are you won’t keep the bid. However that means you are very close. Everytime I was bumped off from a snapshot I usually held the seat on the next bid with openings in that seat. If you are on the snapshot after the first week you are probably going to get the award.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 09:06 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
not really unless you find it interesting. If you are near the bottom for the first couple days chances are you won’t keep the bid. However that means you are very close. Everytime I was bumped off from a snapshot I usually held the seat on the next bid with openings in that seat. If you are on the snapshot after the first week you are probably going to get the award.
Ah gotcha, yes that makes perfect sense...
Turbosina is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 09:09 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,338
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
United isn’t going to park any WBs until new ones replace them. So we should either remain static or that number will get more junior as new 787s arrive.
When the the 787's do eventually replace the 767 fleet, I'd expect the seniority of that flying to go up. We will be parking a lower paid aircraft with one that pays much more. I'd imagine that there are many people who don't want to fly long haul while sleeping in a Polaris seat for only $14/hour more than a 737, but would probably be willing to bid a comfortable plane with an actual bunk when the difference is $87/hr.
Hedley is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 10:01 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
When the the 787's do eventually replace the 767 fleet, I'd expect the seniority of that flying to go up. We will be parking a lower paid aircraft with one that pays much more. I'd imagine that there are many people who don't want to fly long haul while sleeping in a Polaris seat for only $14/hour more than a 737, but would probably be willing to bid a comfortable plane with an actual bunk when the difference is $87/hr.
I agree completely. But that doesn’t stop retirements from happening
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 10:18 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by 60av8tor
It depends. What are you trying to glean from it?
Like most people, I'm just trying to figure out my chances of transferring into another base, and/or upgrading into that base. (I have my base trade request in, and there is one matching trade request on the most recent trade request snapshot. But it looks like if I traded, I'd be the most junior guy in BES, and I believe that isn't allowed, correct? I'm not sure if that aspect of UPA23 has been implemented yet.)

I guess the tricky thing with the snapshot is that it has no way of predicting how many people will successfully bid into a new BES, thereby freeing up their spot for someone else who wants it. So for example, in this current bid, there are no NBCA vacancies listed. There are only WBCA vacancies. However, it stands to reason that at least some of those WBCA spots will go to NBCAs who bid it, thereby freeing up NBCA slots and allowing people (who aren't currently NBCAs) to hold those slots. But there's no way to know that until the bid closes.

The other thing that confuses the heck out of me is, the bid notice indicates that there are a lot of NBCA slots being freed up because they were initially awarded to new hires who decided not to keep their CA awards. Yet if you look at the snapshots, the number of NBCA slots listed is far fewer than the number of slots mentioned as being available. Totally puzzled. Is the answer simply that Manpower Planning has the *ability* to award up to XX NBCA slots that were released by new hires, but due to company needs, has decided to actually award fewer slots?

Last edited by Turbosina; 05-09-2024 at 10:31 AM.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 10:31 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Like most people, I'm just trying to figure out my chances of transferring into another base, and/or upgrading into that base. I guess the tricky thing with the snapshot is that it has no way of predicting how many people will successfully bid into a new BES, thereby freeing up their spot for someone else who wants it. So for example, in this current bid, there are no NBCA vacancies listed...there are only WBCA vacancies. However, it stands to reason that at least some of those WBCA spots will go to NBCAs who bid it, thereby freeing up NBCA slots and allowing people (who aren't currently NBCAs) to hold those slots. But there's no way to know that until the bid closes.

The other thing that confuses the heck out of me is, the bid notice indicates that there are a lot of NBCA slots being freed up because they were initially awarded to new hires who decided not to keep their CA awards. Yet if you look at the snapshots, the number of NBCA slots listed is far fewer than the number of slots mentioned as being available. Totally puzzled...
those spots are not freed up they are available. The pilots you see listed are bidding for the available slots. if it says 10 avail and 5 are posted then only 5 pilots have a valid bid in. Therefore there are still 5 pilots who don’t want there CA bid still in the position. Those CAs have elected to forego there slot IF there are any takers they weren’t “let out” from the position.

i didn’t explain that super well…..but I hope you get the idea.

the filling of unwanted new hire CA positions is outside the min/max bulletin.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 05-09-2024, 12:19 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 226
Default

The snapshots are basically "eh have the computer spit something out"

The actual bid goes through a lot more manual processing and the company has the ability to tinker with it in a number of ways. 90% of those ways give more mobility than the snapshot might suggest.

Bid what you want, you'll get it eventually. Even when you do get it, there's always some uncertainty about when it activates.
VacancyBid is offline  
Old 05-10-2024, 11:52 AM
  #59  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,674
Default

Originally Posted by JurgenKlopp
Bottom folks are out in SFO 777. They are 06 CAL hires and UAL guys who road the bottom of the lost decade. Gotta get through UAL furloughess and everyone hired by CAL up to 2008. Yeah not gonna happen. Never underestimate how many guys that live in DEN, IAH, and ORD burbs decide to start commuting to SFO WB Capt once the house becomes empty nest. Used to see it all the time.
What's the DOH for WB CA in EWR?
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 05-10-2024, 01:02 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
What's the DOH for WB CA in EWR?
sCAL Sept '05 (sUAL 4/98) on yesterday's snapshot on the 777. 787 was a little senior to that in EWR.
UALinIAH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FUPM
Atlas/Polar
71
09-26-2017 02:11 PM
LeeMat
United
214
02-06-2013 07:04 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices