Search

Notices

United Airbus?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2024, 05:50 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
and per Airbus in the quarterly results last week the XLR is on track for entry into service 3Q2024.

In May, Airbus delayed the entry of service of its newest model to early 2024 from late 2023 as a result of the regulatory review, and in October it postponed the date to the second quarter of 2024.
​​​​​​​oh, so now is Q3, nor Q2, or 1 or last year.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 05:54 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,552
Default

Originally Posted by D0zingfordollar
Hello all, looking to create some conversation on the topic. With constant Boeing issues and delivery delays on NB & WB, doesn’t seem too unreasonable for Scott and crew to theoretically be looking to Airbus (especially WB) to swoop in keep United next going, replace aging jets, and grow. Any news on 350 orders? 350-1000? The late summer 330 rumor? Desire for 350-1K’s range? Side note, why don’t our 321’s have the raccoon eyes?
Scott is on record that he doesn't desire to add the A350 has it is very expensive to add and it will tie up training resources with the movement it will create. My person opinion, I do not see the A350 happening. United use the 787 HGWs as some 767/772 replacements. The 77Ws are still very young...
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 05:56 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 158
Default

No one answered the lack of racoon eyes question. Looks a lot better with them.
hamsandwich is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 05:58 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,088
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
oh, so now is Q3, nor Q2, or 1 or last year.
maybe we should start a pool for what will get certified first? MAX10 or XLR?
TFAYD is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 06:03 AM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2024
Posts: 22
Default

Why would United even order the XLR's if they weren't planning to utilize them for the full potential? You don't need an XLR to do what the NEO can do. It will absolutely take over some of the flying that makes the 756 fleet so desireable.
FLARE99 is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 06:21 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by FLARE99
Why would United even order the XLR's if they weren't planning to utilize them for the full potential? You don't need an XLR to do what the NEO can do. It will absolutely take over some of the flying that makes the 756 fleet so desireable.
yes it 100% will….once it is certified and on property…….neither of which will happen before 2026.

And YES you do need the XLR to do what the NEO CANT do because the NEO doesn’t have enough gas and isn’t ETOPS….yet.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 09:07 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Guppy CA
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by hamsandwich
No one answered the lack of racoon eyes question. Looks a lot better with them.
The NEO doesn't have it, but I heard the XLR will. Apparently it's some sort of certification thing with that airframe, but I could be wrong. I personally think it looks terrible, so I wouldn't mind if it doesn't, but I think the XLR will require them.
BurritoBeach is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 09:39 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,956
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
yes it 100% will….once it is certified and on property…….neither of which will happen before 2026.

And YES you do need the XLR to do what the NEO CANT do because the NEO doesn’t have enough gas and isn’t ETOPS….yet.
For what it’s worth they can install the ACTs during a long overnight. NEOs have the panel for them and the fuel lines are already installed. No sense in dragging empty tanks around while the 75’s are still on property. No idea if that’s the plan or not but the added range is essentially a hand wave away.
DarkSideMoon is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 09:50 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 215
Default

Originally Posted by hamsandwich
No one answered the lack of racoon eyes question. Looks a lot better with them.
Meh. It’s all a matter of opinion. I think they look ugly with them. They’re like a**holes, everyone’s got one!
MaxThrust1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2024, 10:33 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: 73FO
Posts: 347
Default

IMO If Boeing gave us credit memos, not cash, for the most recent grounding that signals the Max and 78 will remain our NB and WB of choice going forward. Maybe there will be some bus leases in the short term or a small number of future 73 options switched to 321's years down the road, but adding 350's or 330's seems unlikely.
BlueScholar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iahflyr
United
3
10-18-2018 10:46 AM
iahflyr
United
0
08-02-2018 08:58 AM
thor2j
United
78
04-13-2013 06:59 AM
HSLD
United
18
09-20-2010 04:47 AM
T Dawg
United
9
09-19-2010 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices