Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United planeides off runway at Bush Airport >

United planeides off runway at Bush Airport

Search

Notices

United planeides off runway at Bush Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2024, 02:52 PM
  #221  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot
I believe that it is a common misperception that you need to OVERRIDE the current brake pressure. I asked a mechanic at my airline, and he showed me in the Boeing repair manual that it took 1,000-1,200 psi of hydraulic pressure from the brake pedals to disengauge the autobrakes, no matter what the autobrake setting is. Interestingly, I also was taught in ground school and also on IOE that you had to override the autobrakes. Have you ever found that you had been taught wrong? Try this with auto brakes 3 or higher, and I bet that you will be surprised at how little pressure it takes.

This was on the 737-300, (mumble) years ago, so I agree that the design may have changed. I just don't think so.
Where did I use the word OVERRIDE? Apply gradually until disconnection, then hold what you've got, reduce or increase it gradually if you need to.

I was a mechanic on this thing and every other boeing except 787 for 12 years. 1000-1200 psi at the wheels you're past wheel lockup. Antiskid intervenes before that. Maybe with very heavy weights youd get that pressure at the wheels. This is where more weight on wheels means more brake pressure can be applied before wheel lockup resulting in more braking power. Anyway, this is way overthinking it.

With 17 years flying Boeing aircraft I think I've run out of ways to surprise myself with autobrakes a long time ago.
VforVendetta is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 05:08 PM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 515
Default

Originally Posted by VforVendetta
Where did I use the word OVERRIDE? Apply gradually until disconnection, then hold what you've got, reduce or increase it gradually if you need to.

I was a mechanic on this thing and every other boeing except 787 for 12 years. 1000-1200 psi at the wheels you're past wheel lockup. Antiskid intervenes before that. Maybe with very heavy weights youd get that pressure at the wheels. This is where more weight on wheels means more brake pressure can be applied before wheel lockup resulting in more braking power. Anyway, this is way overthinking it.

With 17 years flying Boeing aircraft I think I've run out of ways to surprise myself with autobrakes a long time ago.
Question for the mechanic. Why do we not arm speed brakes for take off? The RTO procedure for most operators have you manually doing it. It is strange. My systems manual has been gutted and doesn't mention much of anything these days.
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 05:27 PM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,338
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
I’ve flown the 777 and 756, and while I’ll admit they are better planes, they aren’t THAT much better. When I look at NB CAs that for the most part (aside from IAH CAs) are in shape, and look their age vs WB captains that look like death is knocking on the door. I feel like I made a good decision.
Thats basically where I stand, having also flown the 777 and 756 plus others. 20 years ago long haul flying was great, however as I have aged, my priorities have changed. I can no longer take the fatigue. Since coming back to the 737 I sleep normal hours, exercise regularly, my weight/BP is right where it should be and I feel so much better. Since I won't fly at night anymore, that leaves only the 737 and the bus. On the 737 I get lines with no more than 2 legs per day, no duty between 2300-0600 LBT, and layovers that allow for workouts. Since that is harder to do on the bus, I'll retire off of this thing.
Hedley is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 06:09 PM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,265
Default

Originally Posted by Nordhavn
Question for the mechanic. Why do we not arm speed brakes for take off? The RTO procedure for most operators have you manually doing it. It is strange. My systems manual has been gutted and doesn't mention much of anything these days.
Once you deploy the reversers on a 737 RTO the speed brakes should deploy automatically, no need to arm them. If you forget or don't go into reverse, then yes you must do the speed brakes manually.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 07:02 PM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 515
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Once you deploy the reversers on a 737 RTO the speed brakes should deploy automatically, no need to arm them. If you forget or don't go into reverse, then yes you must do the speed brakes manually.
Yes that sounds correct. If you don't deploy the TR's then no spoilers. My question is why Boeing or the operators don't arm spoilers for T.O. There is a reason why. The spoilers should really deploy full up as soon as you close the thrust levers. High speed aborts are dangerous and these spoilers are very important for performance.

Last edited by Nordhavn; 04-08-2024 at 07:12 PM.
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 07:12 PM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,354
Default

Originally Posted by Nordhavn
My question is why Boeing or the operators don't arm spoilers for T.O.
Well then it's a good thing we train for these events. If I'm rejecting a takeoff: 1. Power idle, 2. Apply brakes/verify auto brakes, 3. Deploy the reversers, 4. Verify spoilers.

Boeings don't retract the speed brakes when you apply full power either. That's why we are trained to retract them during a terrain avoidance maneuver.

Would arming them before takeoff even work? I thought they only deploy once main gear touchdown occurs. I'm not sure if the logic would work if you are already on the ground.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 04-08-2024, 08:21 PM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 515
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Well then it's a good thing we train for these events. If I'm rejecting a takeoff: 1. Power idle, 2. Apply brakes/verify auto brakes, 3. Deploy the reversers, 4. Verify spoilers.

Boeings don't retract the speed brakes when you apply full power either. That's why we are trained to retract them during a terrain avoidance maneuver.

Would arming them before takeoff even work? I thought they only deploy once main gear touchdown occurs. I'm not sure if the logic would work if you are already on the ground.
If doesn't matter if they're armed for T.O. or landing. The logic is the same. They work but for some reason Boeing has changed the procedure for whatever reason the systems book is a joke nowadays.
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 04-09-2024, 12:47 AM
  #228  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Well then it's a good thing we train for these events. If I'm rejecting a takeoff: 1. Power idle, 2. Apply brakes/verify auto brakes, 3. Deploy the reversers, 4. Verify spoilers.

Boeings don't retract the speed brakes when you apply full power either. That's why we are trained to retract them during a terrain avoidance maneuver.

Would arming them before takeoff even work? I thought they only deploy once main gear touchdown occurs. I'm not sure if the logic would work if you are already on the ground.
Ummm, perhaps you should read the FM. You're doing it out of order. Always always speedbrakes first, then thrust reversers.it doesn't say "verify" it says "manually raise". The reason is that brakes do most of deceleration work. Reversers do a small part. It's much more important a d critical to deploy ground spoilers asap to exert more downward pressure onto the wheels so more force can be applied to the brakes before wheel locking (anti-skid system action). In fact there's zero credit given to stopping distance performance calculations on a dry runway, however Thrust Reverser performance is credited on a wet runway. That's how all the stopping performance calculations we use are calculated. With heavy emphasis on brakes + speedbrakes use, mush higher priority than thrust reversers.

FAR part 25 (Transport Category Aircraft) design criteria rules. This is where you look to see why the manufacturer designed systems in a particular way. The FAA mandates it that way. Its not boeing or airbus genius as much.

Here is a link to FAR 25.109 (accelerate-stop distance regulation criteria) its all in there.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/25.109


Here's a copy & paste from the FM: look at the priority of actions. Do it right please.

Captain
Accomplishes the following:
Calls “Reject” or “Reject, I have the aircraft”
Simultaneously brings both thrust levers to idle and disengages the autothrottles
Confirms RTO braking or initiates maximum manual braking
Manually raises speed brake lever
Initiates maximum reverse thrust consistent with runway and airplane conditions
Calls for the “Rejected Takeoff checklist”

I think I'm done here. This is getting too embarrassing.
VforVendetta is offline  
Old 04-09-2024, 12:54 AM
  #229  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Well then it's a good thing we train for these events. If I'm rejecting a takeoff: 1. Power idle, 2. Apply brakes/verify auto brakes, 3. Deploy the reversers, 4. Verify spoilers.

Boeings don't retract the speed brakes when you apply full power either. That's why we are trained to retract them during a terrain avoidance maneuver.

Would arming them before takeoff even work? I thought they only deploy once main gear touchdown occurs. I'm not sure if the logic would work if you are already on the ground.
Ummm, perhaps you should read the FM. You're doing it out of order. Always always speedbrakes first, then thrust reversers. It doesn't say "verify" it says "manually raise". The reason is that brakes do most of deceleration work. Reversers do a small part. It's much more important and critical to deploy ground spoilers asap to exert more downward pressure onto the wheels so more force can be applied to the brakes before wheel locking (anti-skid system action). In fact there's zero thrustreverse credit given to stopping distance performance calculations on a dry runway, however Thrust Reverser performance is credited on a wet runway. That's how all the stopping performance calculations we use are calculated. With heavy emphasis on brakes + speedbrakes use, mush higher priority than thrust reversers.

FAR part 25 (Transport Category Aircraft) design criteria rules. This is where you look to see why the manufacturer designed systems in a particular way. The FAA mandates it that way. Its not boeing or airbus genius that much.

Here is a link to FAR 25.109 (accelerate-stop distance regulation criteria) its all in there.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/25.109


Here's a copy & paste from the FM: look at the priority of actions. Do it right please.

Captain
Accomplishes the following:
Calls “Reject” or “Reject, I have the aircraft”
Simultaneously brings both thrust levers to idle and disengages the autothrottles
Confirms RTO braking or initiates maximum manual braking
Manually raises speed brake lever
Initiates maximum reverse thrust consistent with runway and airplane conditions
Calls for the “Rejected Takeoff checklist”

I think I'm done here. This is getting too embarrassing.
VforVendetta is offline  
Old 04-09-2024, 01:34 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,354
Default

Originally Posted by VforVendetta
Ummm, perhaps you should read the FM. You're doing it out of order....
We work for different companies. That's the order Delta does it.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ryder1587
Southwest
2156
12-11-2022 01:17 PM
iahflyr
United
0
08-02-2018 08:58 AM
Boeing Aviator
United
9
11-25-2016 12:58 PM
oldmako
United
25
01-19-2016 02:53 PM
bottoms up
United
18
12-22-2015 10:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices