Search

Notices

Florida Hub Rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2024, 07:02 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
luv757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by 11atsomto
maybe I'm misunderstanding, isn't there already a 737 base? or do you just mean by making it a HUB they will have to grow the base or potentially add other equip to said base.
That's what I mean. More 737 positions and possibly 320 and Widebody.
luv757 is offline  
Old 02-08-2024, 11:27 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,351
Default

MCO would make a lot of sense. DL has ATL and AA has MIA. UA doesn’t have any SE hub. Terminal C has space to launch WBs and Spirit is talking about “right sizing” the airline so who knows if they reduce their footprint there.

I know there’s market for MCO to Europe and South America. DL currently runs Orlando to Amsterdam, British to Gatwick, and Virgin to Heathrow. All with solid loads. I believe that UA can be a force to be reckoned with if they decided to do a hub out of MCO.
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 02:59 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
I know there’s market for MCO to Europe and South America.
SA to MCO might be a niche. European leisure travel isn't high yield, but there's a lot of weathly south americans who like disney.
Still have a hard time imagining MCO as a hub because where are the connecting passengers coming from and where will they be going? Nashville to San Juan? ATL and CLT make such sense because ther are in the middle of the SE US not at one corner. MIA makes sense as a funnel to points south and because of the inherent size of south florida.
VacancyBid is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 05:16 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by VacancyBid
SA to MCO might be a niche. European leisure travel isn't high yield, but there's a lot of weathly south americans who like disney.
Still have a hard time imagining MCO as a hub because where are the connecting passengers coming from and where will they be going? Nashville to San Juan? ATL and CLT make such sense because ther are in the middle of the SE US not at one corner. MIA makes sense as a funnel to points south and because of the inherent size of south florida.
At some point it's not as much about local traffic. It's more about real estate. AA's traffic in CLT is 85% transient.

Sending NB and WB from MCO going south makes more sense then sending it all from EWR and IAD (especially when NE has weather issues).
MaCrOs is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 06:31 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: 73FO
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by VacancyBid
SA to MCO might be a niche. European leisure travel isn't high yield, but there's a lot of weathly south americans who like disney.
Still have a hard time imagining MCO as a hub because where are the connecting passengers coming from and where will they be going? Nashville to San Juan? ATL and CLT make such sense because ther are in the middle of the SE US not at one corner. MIA makes sense as a funnel to points south and because of the inherent size of south florida.
MIA makes sense but MCO doesn't? MCO carried 600,000 more pax than MIA last year. The Miami metro area is at 6.1 million but it's not like Orlando is a slouch at 4.1 million. Considering will be a shared hub and Tampa's metro area is another 3.0 million people I don't see why it wouldn't work to fill in a massive hole in our network.
BlueScholar is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 08:42 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by BlueScholar
MIA makes sense but MCO doesn't? MCO carried 600,000 more pax than MIA last year. The Miami metro area is at 6.1 million but it's not like Orlando is a slouch at 4.1 million. Considering will be a shared hub and Tampa's metro area is another 3.0 million people I don't see why it wouldn't work to fill in a massive hole in our network.
It would. People don't realize MIA and MCO markets and numbers changed quite a bit in the last few years. It's to the point that bringing C terminal to full 60 gates is already overdue if they'd start doing all the construction right now...
MCO is far from MCO 10 years ago.
MaCrOs is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 09:18 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 657
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
To be fair, these are the same people that closed the IAH 787 base, displaced everyone, then launched IAH-SYD service on the 787.

Not saying what you heard isn’t accurate but the truth changes at this place almost weekly.
OR closed DEN 757 base, displaced everyone, then launced daily service to multiple HI islands from DEN on the 757 (had been Sat only previously). So they re-opened a "new" DEN 757 base. LOL
guppie is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 10:13 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 266
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
MIA is always good for overs though. When you're paid by the minute, sitting there looking at an open gate while waiting on a ground crew or waiting for MIA gates to clear the alley pays pretty well.
Two hours to get to a gate the other day. At least one other United aircraft exceeded the DOT three hours, so I felt lucky. The whole time we were waiting for them to push two heavies and the ramper kept saying it should be about 10 minutes anytime someone asked… Absolutely embarrassing
glassnpowder98 is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 11:05 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by guppie
Tomatoe - tomato. We had a 777 crew base in MIA flying SA routes as I recall (the remnants of the Pan AM purchase). It was a pretty sweet gig. Sure would love to have that option again.
And a 767 base too (did my OE out of there) but we were getting crushed by American. And to build up to something remotely competetive to them in today's world would burn a lot of money with no guarantee it would pay off in the long run.

if you want to argue about decisions in the 1990's to not scale up MIA more, have at it. But the decision to close MIA in 2004 was the right one based on the current and past performance. Sucks for those that were there, but im sure the folks in CLE or HNL or SEA would love to have their old lives back too.
C11DCA is offline  
Old 02-09-2024, 01:54 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by BlueScholar
MIA makes sense but MCO doesn't? MCO carried 600,000 more pax than MIA last year. The Miami metro area is at 6.1 million but it's not like Orlando is a slouch at 4.1 million. Considering will be a shared hub and Tampa's metro area is another 3.0 million people I don't see why it wouldn't work to fill in a massive hole in our network.
Maybe not so much MCO doesn't make sense but growing it to a scale that makes sense is gonna be challening. AA has a huge latin american operation - like 6 cities in Cuba, 6 in Colombia etc. And they have a huge regional operation feeding pax from all over the SE quadrant of the US. MCO is not gonna compete for BHM-RIC type traffic - it's either going to be MCO O&D fighting Southwest, Jetblue, Frontier, etc or trying to collect people from Chicago and Dulles and Nashville going to Bogota ... fighting American. That's gonna need a lot of scale.
VacancyBid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
9
11-25-2016 12:58 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
fdxbusdriver
Cargo
13
11-18-2008 06:37 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
07-13-2005 09:27 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices