Search

Notices

UPA23andMe.com

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2023, 10:59 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

[QUOTE=LJ Driver;3701537]
Originally Posted by BlueScholar

Mmm yes, the “sun sentinel” as your reliable source.

Here you go smarty pants:

Hospitals report every SARS-CoV-2 positive patient who dies in the hospital as a COVID-19-related death.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/healthca...-death-counts/


“Last week, after reporting from the Guardian on mortality rates among children, the CDC corrected a “coding logic error” that had inadvertently added more than 72,000 Covid deaths of all ages to the data tracker, one of the most publicly accessible sources for Covid data.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...t-covid-deaths

Best yet, from THE source, and this is their revised death certificate guidance after the total F up previously. They released this update with no announcement or press release, it happened to be discovered by an actual journalist…
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/covid-...h-data-quality

When healthcare facilities are incentivized by trillions of dollars to list COVID as cause of death, who would have thought that might inflate and exacerbate the count?
Wait, did u just quote the guardian as a reliable source......
GPullR is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 12:59 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 469
Default

[QUOTE=GPullR;3701543]
Originally Posted by LJ Driver
Wait, did u just quote the guardian as a reliable source......
Deflection and subterfuge, I’d expect nothing less. Also, be sure to ignore the other sources, INCLUDING THE CDC ITSELF.

The Guardian actually ran the numbers and called out CDC, then the CDC quietly completely changed their guidance on how to input data on death certificates, and also revised their own data by 72,000.

Stop being a sheep and afraid to question our government. We aren’t perfect, and bureaucrats certainly aren't either.
LJ Driver is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 01:12 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,351
Default

Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan
Wikipedia cites its sources when making a claim. The citations are present in the article. Project Veritas is, objectively, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. Project Veritas has no credible sources for any of its claims. One is not like the other. They cannot be called "journalists" since they are little more than internet trolls weaponizing misinformation and exploiting people who are not media literate (looks like you fall in this category). They are not mavericks who are victims of an oppressive main stream media machine; they are stooges who succeed in duping people like you, even though their claims are easily disproven.

It's scary how people will believe anything on the internet so long as it confirms their preexisting beliefs.
Just because you say it’s objectively misinformation doesn’t make it such. Claims of them “spreading misinformation” has made its way to the court system in NY and they have won every single one of those cases.

Probably a generational thing, but media isn’t what it used to be. They all lost a ton of credibility (fox included) when Covid happened. In this day in age, pretty easy to do basic research and spot inconsistencies.

This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 02:30 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 805
Default

It isn't generational there have always been fringe "news." Remember those rag magazines like Enquirer that were at the grocery store check out line. People bought them and you would listen to your crazy aunt talk about aliens at Thanksgiving dinner but no one takes them seriously. Same thing with these fringe news sites today... it is meant for entertainment and the weak minded. I will smile and listen to your crazy in cruise but no one is taking it seriously. You are tilting at windmills.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 02:43 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Just because you say it’s objectively misinformation doesn’t make it such. Claims of them “spreading misinformation” has made its way to the court system in NY and they have won every single one of those cases.
Wrong.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/project-veritas-loses-jury-verdict-democratic-consulting-firm-2022-09-23/

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/project-veritas-loses-journalistic-and-attorney-client-privilege-claims-in-ashley-biden-case/amp/
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 04:02 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 544
Default

Soo funny that they are starting to take down a lot on this website. Crazies dont want there name out there anymore. That backfired for them.
Gooselives is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 04:06 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

[QUOTE=LJ Driver;3701594]
Originally Posted by GPullR

Deflection and subterfuge, I’d expect nothing less. Also, be sure to ignore the other sources, INCLUDING THE CDC ITSELF.

The Guardian actually ran the numbers and called out CDC, then the CDC quietly completely changed their guidance on how to input data on death certificates, and also revised their own data by 72,000.

Stop being a sheep and afraid to question our government. We aren’t perfect, and bureaucrats certainly aren't either.
I question government all the time. Example, how did they give you a medical??
GPullR is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 04:36 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Just because you say it’s objectively misinformation doesn’t make it such. Claims of them “spreading misinformation” has made its way to the court system in NY and they have won every single one of those cases.

Probably a generational thing, but media isn’t what it used to be. They all lost a ton of credibility (fox included) when Covid happened. In this day in age, pretty easy to do basic research and spot inconsistencies.

This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day
Yeah, hate to break it to the poster but project veritas, cdc, fbi, and Wiley coyote all have the same credibility nowadays. Major media outlets have become pure propaganda. Social media outlets actively banning discourse in support of x administration under what a federal court called “possibly the largest 1st amendment infringement in history”.
Spartacusbob is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 04:59 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,501
Default

You’ve misread the article; they got found guilty of wiretapping & misrepresentation of who they were, not what they actually said about the group they infiltrated.

They might be shady, but I don’t think they’ve been successfully challenged legally on libel.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 09-25-2023, 06:39 PM
  #110  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2023
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer

This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day
Don’t flatter yourself little guy, I just think it’s funny how easily people are duped, and how self-righteous and reality denying they are when confronted with objective reality. I mean, you’re taking the 21st century version of the national enquirer as fact. I’m sorry we’re not taking you seriously, and I’m sorry you’ve lost the plot, but I hope you’re doing well <3

i’ll buy ya a beer if we ever fly together. hope
you have a nice night pal
AntiCompanyMan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices