Search

Notices

Age 67 fallout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2023, 04:22 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Those closer to 65 will have already burned through most of their sick time & will be faced with the unpleasant reality that if they stay, they’ll actually have to work.
Imagine the horror, and likely on a NB no less!
LJ Driver is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 04:57 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,316
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Those closer to 65 will have already burned through most of their sick time & will be faced with the unpleasant reality that if they stay, they’ll actually have to work.
Only having to wait 60 days for a 2 year tax free retirement supplement of $14,339 per month plus at least 120 hours from the ESB doesn’t seem very unpleasant, especially considering that the company will also be putting money into their retirement plan.

The bigger issue will be if ICAO doesn’t follow, or takes a long time to change.
Hedley is online now  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:05 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Position: DL320A
Posts: 241
Default

I expect the FAA to use it as an excuse to re evaluate the medical process.

I look forward to our 6mo mental competency and stress tests.
Flyweight is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:18 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 872
Default

I was under the impression that this would allow those that have already retired to come back to their original seniority. Is this correct? Also that 67 would add 2 years and until their 68th birthday. So essentially 3 years minus 1 day. Is this also correct?
cal73 is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:26 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
Only having to wait 60 days for a 2 year tax free retirement supplement of $14,339 per month plus at least 120 hours from the ESB doesn’t seem very unpleasant, especially considering that the company will also be putting money into their retirement plan.
You guys are better at gaming the system than me. I’d better call my senator & change myself to a yes!
hummingbear is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:29 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,336
Default

Originally Posted by Flyweight
I expect the FAA to use it as an excuse to re evaluate the medical process.

I look forward to our 6mo mental competency and stress tests.
It’s being sold as a means to mitigate the pilot shortage, not amplify it.
ReadOnly7 is online now  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:31 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,351
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
I was under the impression that this would allow those that have already retired to come back to their original seniority. Is this correct?
I don’t believe the bill as proposed outlines how airlines have to offer callbacks, deal with seniority, etc., or even whether they do at all. There would almost certainly be multiple lawsuits in the years to follow.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:31 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,336
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
I was under the impression that this would allow those that have already retired to come back to their original seniority. Is this correct? Also that 67 would add 2 years and until their 68th birthday. So essentially 3 years minus 1 day. Is this also correct?
The 67 & 364 days part of your statement is patently false. The return to seniority is up to the airline, not the FAA. I think most companies aren’t interested in requaling 2 years worth of retirees for a year of useful service at the highest cost possible.
ReadOnly7 is online now  
Old 09-13-2023, 05:32 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Position: DL320A
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
It’s being sold as a means to mitigate the pilot shortage, not amplify it.
I have worked with career FAA GS-15s. Bureaucracy always wants to expand.
Flyweight is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 06:40 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 680
Default

Originally Posted by Flyweight
I expect the FAA to use it as an excuse to re evaluate the medical process.

I look forward to our 6mo mental competency and stress tests.
Read the language in the bill more closely. It specifically says that 1st class medical standards will not change.
Bahamasflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unicornpilot
Major
52
01-04-2020 07:23 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices