TA Done
09-01-2023, 08:05 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,362
will pass 70-80%, just like the other two of the Big-3 did, AA and DAL.
likewise, the NO voters will all call the YES voters as
weak
caved in
"all about the money"
ignorant
misinformed
etc
with that said, good luck boys
likewise, the NO voters will all call the YES voters as
weak
caved in
"all about the money"
ignorant
misinformed
etc
with that said, good luck boys
09-01-2023, 08:37 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Exactly. I voted hell no for the tumi TA but also voting no for this. Next time the company will say we gave the pilots too much if we vote it in 94%. I think it will pass by 90%. Plus, we deserve more.
09-01-2023, 08:39 AM
#15
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Position: Upside Down
Posts: 77
A 94 percent YES sends the message that we’re united as a group and won’t sell out for a measly $1.5B deal. TUMI TA continues to insult each of us!
09-01-2023, 08:55 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,361
All these guys fighting about how they’re voting Y or N & haven’t even seen the final language. An unfortunate representation of the majority, IMO- it’ll pass at over 80%. No doubt this is better than TUMI, but that alone doesn’t earn a YES vote. I have my concerns & I’ll be reading the full contract & asking questions of my reps. Try to make an educated vote & not an emotional one.
09-01-2023, 09:20 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,143
The company seems to have no issue with new Captains at a major being paired with brand new F/O’s who theoretically have never been a Captain, and having very little turbine time, period. I know Kirby is desperate for this United next thing, but we need to take a good look at how hard we’re pressing the accelerator here. Having said all that, I’m sure most will simply turn to section 3, ignore the rest, and vote yes. Same as it ever was.
09-01-2023, 09:47 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
The company seems to have no issue with new Captains at a major being paired with brand new F/O’s who theoretically have never been a Captain, and having very little turbine time, period. I know Kirby is desperate for this United next thing, but we need to take a good look at how hard we’re pressing the accelerator here. Having said all that, I’m sure most will simply turn to section 3, ignore the rest, and vote yes. Same as it ever was.
09-01-2023, 09:47 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
The company seems to have no issue with new Captains at a major being paired with brand new F/O’s who theoretically have never been a Captain, and having very little turbine time, period. I know Kirby is desperate for this United next thing, but we need to take a good look at how hard we’re pressing the accelerator here. Having said all that, I’m sure most will simply turn to section 3, ignore the rest, and vote yes. Same as it ever was.
FYI
1995 or close to that era
captain upgrade 2-3 years
FOs interns with 250 hours
