View Poll Results: Will you upgrade with a ratified contract?
Yes
67
21.00%
No
168
52.66%
Undecided
84
26.33%
Voters: 319. You may not vote on this poll
Captain Upgrade with New TA: Yes or No
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,954
the hyperbole….. how many RJ’s have crashed in the last decade? And those are first time captains with first time jet pilots flying with far fewer tools and more archaic aircraft.
#102
Part of the reason RJs haven’t been crashing over the past decade is that the FAA has increased safety standards- including pilot experience requirements- in that time frame. Many of these changes came in response to Colgan 3407 just outside the timeframe in question. So if increased experience requirements have effectively increased airline safety, isn’t it a valid concern that relaxing experience requirements could do the opposite?
#103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,954
Frankly, 1 is a lot of people to kill, so as frightening as it is to consider, it would only take a single tragic outcome to grant at least some validity to that statement.
Part of the reason RJs haven’t been crashing over the past decade is that the FAA has increased safety standards- including pilot experience requirements- in that time frame. Many of these changes came in response to Colgan 3407 just outside the timeframe in question. So if increased experience requirements have effectively increased airline safety, isn’t it a valid concern that relaxing experience requirements could do the opposite?
Part of the reason RJs haven’t been crashing over the past decade is that the FAA has increased safety standards- including pilot experience requirements- in that time frame. Many of these changes came in response to Colgan 3407 just outside the timeframe in question. So if increased experience requirements have effectively increased airline safety, isn’t it a valid concern that relaxing experience requirements could do the opposite?
The logic and precedent is already there with the 1000 hour and other R-ATP carveouts. Certain types of training or experience make up for the raw numbers. I think having the long OE and at least 350 in type at United is valuable.
#104
Hyperbole, perhaps. Do you not feel your Spidey sense already tingling, let alone with this provision? Admittedly I am actively imbibing whilst perusing the red line, so….
I did see this little nugget in 8–C-8:
“Pilots who do not meet the requirements of FAR Part 121.436 will not be eligible to be awarded or assigned Captain vacancies”
what are said requirements, you ask?
§121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements.
(a) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft (or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires three or more pilots) unless the pilot:
(1) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate not subject to the limitations in § 61.167 of this chapter;
(2) Holds an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown; and
(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under §91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of this chapter or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of this paragraph (a)(3) is
not required.
I believe this means that only Frontier/JetBlue/Southwest equivalent type rating holders can take or get a direct entry spot.
thoughts?
I did see this little nugget in 8–C-8:
“Pilots who do not meet the requirements of FAR Part 121.436 will not be eligible to be awarded or assigned Captain vacancies”
what are said requirements, you ask?
§121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements.
(a) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft (or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires three or more pilots) unless the pilot:
(1) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate not subject to the limitations in § 61.167 of this chapter;
(2) Holds an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown; and
(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under §91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of this chapter or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of this paragraph (a)(3) is
not required.
I believe this means that only Frontier/JetBlue/Southwest equivalent type rating holders can take or get a direct entry spot.
thoughts?
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,954
Hyperbole, perhaps. Do you not feel your Spidey sense already tingling, let alone with this provision? Admittedly I am actively imbibing whilst perusing the red line, so….
I did see this little nugget in 8–C-8:
“Pilots who do not meet the requirements of FAR Part 121.436 will not be eligible to be awarded or assigned Captain vacancies”
what are said requirements, you ask?
§121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements.
(a) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft (or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires three or more pilots) unless the pilot:
(1) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate not subject to the limitations in § 61.167 of this chapter;
(2) Holds an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown; and
(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under §91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of this chapter or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of this paragraph (a)(3) is
not required.
I believe this means that only Frontier/JetBlue/Southwest equivalent type rating holders can take or get a direct entry spot.
thoughts?
I did see this little nugget in 8–C-8:
“Pilots who do not meet the requirements of FAR Part 121.436 will not be eligible to be awarded or assigned Captain vacancies”
what are said requirements, you ask?
§121.436 Pilot Qualification: Certificates and experience requirements.
(a) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft (or as second in command of an aircraft in a flag or supplemental operation that requires three or more pilots) unless the pilot:
(1) Holds an airline transport pilot certificate not subject to the limitations in § 61.167 of this chapter;
(2) Holds an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown; and
(3) If serving as pilot in command in part 121 operations, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under §91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of this chapter or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of this paragraph (a)(3) is
not required.
I believe this means that only Frontier/JetBlue/Southwest equivalent type rating holders can take or get a direct entry spot.
thoughts?
Thats a solid catch in the regs and if applied that way would be really interesting and, frankly, smart.
#106
#107
#108
Again, in aggregate systems, you play the averages. At 5,000 flights per day, reducing safety margins by just a little can yield dire consequences over time. You may say the present safety record at the regionals justifies the relaxation but I say when the stakes are so high, is it worth the risk? Especially when we have so many other ways to entice our own tenured pilots to voluntarily upgrade, why lean on a policy of compelling the less experienced?
#109
I still personally oppose forced upgrade in general. And I’ve known many who got the call from UAL within a couple months of starting at their LCC, so the type rating from Frontier does not necessarily guarantee “upgrade ready”, but it would be an additional filter if applied that way.
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 190
Again, in aggregate systems, you play the averages. At 5,000 flights per day, reducing safety margins by just a little can yield dire consequences over time. You may say the present safety record at the regionals justifies the relaxation but I say when the stakes are so high, is it worth the risk? Especially when we have so many other ways to entice our own tenured pilots to voluntarily upgrade, why lean on a policy of compelling the less experienced?
I commute on A UAL connector. Am I rolling the roulette when on whether or not I might arrive safely?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post