Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
767 Hard Landing IAH ??? >

767 Hard Landing IAH ???

Search

Notices

767 Hard Landing IAH ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2023, 07:31 PM
  #251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
I tend to stay out of these topics….let me try and say this as nice as I can.

I want to sit next to a pilot who has almost killed themselves a few times or has had someone try to kill them. You need to make bad decisions, learn from them and then move forward. You don’t need to be making first time rookie decisions that could kill you in a plane with 365 people.

the amount I learned from being a CFI, flying single pilot 135, Turbo props and RJs has made me the safe pilot I am today.

that 767 landing in IAH and 757 landing in EWR Im sure were picture perfect until the last 5 seconds. nota lot of time to mentor there…..experience matters.

Truth………………
Spesiellsporing is offline  
Old 08-07-2023, 08:07 PM
  #252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by crjflyer0023
biggest load of crahp ive ever read. Checkride failures dont have the stigma they used to have 10+ years ago. check-ride failures are extremely common now days, and really, no one gives a crap about it anymore. Spirit hired a fresh 1500 cfi with 4 GA failures... jetblue constantly hires people right at this moment, with DUIs or 2+ 121 fails.

Take a look through ALL plane crashes that ever happened. The VAST majority was done by people who never failed a checkride. funny how that works huh?
I hope you realize the absurdity of your argument. Since the majority of pilots hired had no check ride failures there were very few pilots around with check ride failures to cause crashes. You have to normalize everything to the overall population. But maybe I am just an old fart with declining cognitive capabilities.

I am sure you also remember what brought us PRIA and the ATP rule.

people still care about check ride failures but we are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Everyone hires the lowest risk - best attitude to train candidates.

once pilot supply exceeds demand it will be back to TPIC requirements and a PhD in Aerospace Engineering to get an interview.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 08-07-2023, 11:50 PM
  #253  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,781
Default

So there I was reading APC and read how a honkey SJW checkride failer shot down a black UAL pilot. You can’t make this stuff up.

Knock yourself a pro slick. Gray matter back got perform us down I take TCBin, man.
at6d is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 03:58 AM
  #254  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by crjflyer0023
biggest load of crahp ive ever read. Checkride failures dont have the stigma they used to have 10+ years ago. check-ride failures are extremely common now days, and really, no one gives a crap about it anymore. Spirit hired a fresh 1500 cfi with 4 GA failures... jetblue constantly hires people right at this moment, with DUIs or 2+ 121 fails.

Take a look through ALL plane crashes that ever happened. The VAST majority was done by people who never failed a checkride. funny how that works huh?

"total time should be how you judge someone"

again, another big load of crahp. Someone can have 3000 PIC turbine and be a sh1ttyy pilot, and someone can be a 500 hour SIC FO and be a superior pilot. I cant count how many errors and mistakes I caught from crusty old captains. But hey! they must be good only because they have a lot of total time, right?
my mistake I meant to write “shouldn’t”
flying172 is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 05:05 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
So there I was reading APC and read how a honkey SJW checkride failer shot down a black UAL pilot. You can’t make this stuff up.

Knock yourself a pro slick. Gray matter back got perform us down I take TCBin, man.
This might be the funniest thing I’ve seen on the internet all year. Thank you.

Also, “honky sjw checkride failer” is just beautiful.
Spartacusbob is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 05:24 AM
  #256  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Default

Originally Posted by Jersey
Not good to **** off old people. Old people rule the world.
And they are doing a bang up job, too.
Red Forman is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 06:16 AM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
khergan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 146
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman
And they are doing a bang up job, too.
I hope that's sarcasm.

God help you if it isn't...statistically the generation in power has squandered the greatest wealth accumulation the world has ever seen and provided the absolute worst leadership, government, monetary policy, the list goes on. The sooner they are out of power, the better.
khergan is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 06:32 AM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 513
Default

Originally Posted by crjflyer0023
biggest load of crahp ive ever read. Checkride failures dont have the stigma they used to have 10+ years ago. check-ride failures are extremely common now days, and really, no one gives a crap about it anymore. Spirit hired a fresh 1500 cfi with 4 GA failures... jetblue constantly hires people right at this moment, with DUIs or 2+ 121 fails.

Take a look through ALL plane crashes that ever happened. The VAST majority was done by people who never failed a checkride. funny how that works huh?

"total time should be how you judge someone"

again, another big load of crahp. Someone can have 3000 PIC turbine and be a sh1ttyy pilot, and someone can be a 500 hour SIC FO and be a superior pilot. I cant count how many errors and mistakes I caught from crusty old captains. But hey! they must be good only because they have a lot of total time, right?
You have just started your career so why are you so angry? Nobody said you are a substandard pilot just because you are apart of one of the most inexperienced hiring waves in the history of this industry. Cheer up skippy!
Nordhavn is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 10:23 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 510
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
I hope you realize the absurdity of your argument. Since the majority of pilots hired had no check ride failures there were very few pilots around with check ride failures to cause crashes. You have to normalize everything to the overall population. But maybe I am just an old fart with declining cognitive capabilities.

I am sure you also remember what brought us PRIA and the ATP rule.

people still care about check ride failures but we are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Everyone hires the lowest risk - best attitude to train candidates.

once pilot supply exceeds demand it will be back to TPIC requirements and a PhD in Aerospace Engineering to get an interview.
I was going to type the same thing but you saved me the key strokes. What a joke this guy is…
Knotcher is offline  
Old 08-08-2023, 12:37 PM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EyeKantEven's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: B737NG forward-facing aft lav
Posts: 127
Default They're lucky they didn't cartwheel

I just read the NTSB report on United 627. Wow.

Looks like FO's first flight in the airplane, and Cap'n had very little experience as a PIC (1,537 in ALL AIRCRAFT).

Expect this to keep happening as long as experience is overlooked in the hiring / qualifying / promoting decisions.

Can't wait to hear the story of Delta flying thru an Italian hailstorm!

Go United!
EyeKantEven is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scut Farkus
Charter
27
03-27-2020 07:29 PM
SVA402
Technical
34
05-21-2013 05:45 AM
Hawker445
Safety
2
08-22-2012 08:51 AM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
9
04-10-2006 09:51 PM
AIRGUY
Regional
39
01-30-2006 08:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices