Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
767 Hard Landing IAH ??? >

767 Hard Landing IAH ???

Search

Notices

767 Hard Landing IAH ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2023, 10:01 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
The blame for this 756 fleet hull loss, the last one (2019), and the 777 near miss of Maui can be squarely placed on UAL scheduling/ reserve rules- particularly global reserve/rolled days off that make being junior on WB fleets so unappealing that pilots on the line don’t want it, and it’s given to new hires. Often those new hires are the youngest and least experienced pilots at United.

First look at the AIP shows that Rolled days off/Global reserve rules are still present. It’s yet to be seen if any of the other reserve improvements will be enough to make widebody fleets desirable or if they’re still going to new hires. If things aren’t fixed, UAL is eventually going to kill a bunch of people. The FAA knows it, TK instructors know it, line pilots know it yet UAL management chooses to ignore it.
If you're blaming the 777 on inexperience, you're clearly out of the loop, so I can't take anything else in your argument seriously. And new-hires to the 756 isn't new.
JFS 3 is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 10:03 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by JFS 3
If you're blaming the 777 on inexperience, you're clearly out of the loop, so I can't take anything else in your argument seriously. And new-hires to the 756 isn't new.
Personality conflict in the flight deck combined with lack of experience in the FO seat playing a factor…
Otterbox is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 10:11 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Personality conflict in the flight deck combined with lack of experience in the FO seat playing a factor…
‘You are kind of reaching with inexperience being a contributing factor to the 777 UAS event…. More as the personal conflict leading to decrease CRM thus reducing the crews SA played more of a role in event…..

Don’t assume that just because a New Hire gets the a WB slot mean they are inexperience for global operations. We have folks who have lots of experience flying overseas and WB aircraft taking the WB fleet as a NH over the AB guppy. There is inexperience across the entire operation and we aren’t the only airline dealing with it as the hiring landscape has changed since Covid.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 10:19 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
Don’t assume that just because a New Hire gets the a WB slot mean they are inexperience for global operations. We have folks who have lots of experience flying overseas and WB aircraft taking the WB fleet as a NH over the AB guppy. There is inexperience across the entire operation and we aren’t the only airline dealing with it as the hiring landscape has changed since Covid.
This. I just flew with a new hire who is a former 777 CA at Qatar....more than a few from Emirates too.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 12:40 PM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
The blame for this 756 fleet hull loss, the last one (2019), and the 777 near miss of Maui can be squarely placed on UAL scheduling/ reserve rules- particularly global reserve/rolled days off that make being junior on WB fleets so unappealing that pilots on the line don’t want it, and it’s given to new hires. Often those new hires are the youngest and least experienced pilots at United.

First look at the AIP shows that Rolled days off/Global reserve rules are still present. It’s yet to be seen if any of the other reserve improvements will be enough to make widebody fleets desirable or if they’re still going to new hires. If things aren’t fixed, UAL is eventually going to kill a bunch of people. The FAA knows it, TK instructors know it, line pilots know it yet UAL management chooses to ignore it.
its OK to crater a 737 instead?
TFAYD is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 12:41 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
100 hours of OE is extreme and people should be let go before it ever gets to that point. Under normal circumstances, if the pilot is safe and just needs experience and mentoring, you give them that. If they are weak to the point where their flying ability, judgement, or situational awareness is below standards, you have them removed from the trip and let the training department deal with it. Personally, I’ve never had anyone who I considered unsafe, however there have been a few where their lack of experience was very evident.
Yes, Dick Ferris and UAL knowingly hired pilots that were unsafe during the strike in 1985--because they would scab. I've flown with some--and back then with TK populated by SCABS, they would sweep it under the rug as fast as you could write safety reports. For many SCABS, TK was safe haven. They couldn't really damage a plane sitting in the sim.

However, we are a long way removed from those times, and thankfully, except for myself, I think we have done a good job of hiring good pilots. The next year or so may get interesting though.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 01:13 PM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,321
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
Yes, Dick Ferris and UAL knowingly hired pilots that were unsafe during the strike in 1985--because they would scab. I've flown with some--and back then with TK populated by SCABS, they would sweep it under the rug as fast as you could write safety reports. For many SCABS, TK was safe haven. They couldn't really damage a plane sitting in the sim.

However, we are a long way removed from those times, and thankfully, except for myself, I think we have done a good job of hiring good pilots. The next year or so may get interesting though.
The CAL side was even worse. The training department, chief pilot offices, and even some key ALPA positions were safe havens for scabs. I don’t miss those days.

Overall, I’ve been pleased with our new hires. There has only been a few people that I have flown with that had very little experience before coming here. All met the basic standard required in our training, but they didn’t easily exceed that standard like the more experienced pilots we have traditionally hired. With time they will gain experience and have safe and productive careers, I just hope that they realize their limitations and postpone upgrade until they are ready, not when a vacancy snapshot shows that they can hold the seat.
Hedley is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 02:27 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
The blame for this 756 fleet hull loss, the last one (2019), and the 777 near miss of Maui can be squarely placed on UAL scheduling/ reserve rules- particularly global reserve/rolled days off that make being junior on WB fleets so unappealing that pilots on the line don’t want it, and it’s given to new hires. Often those new hires are the youngest and least experienced pilots at United.

First look at the AIP shows that Rolled days off/Global reserve rules are still present. It’s yet to be seen if any of the other reserve improvements will be enough to make widebody fleets desirable or if they’re still going to new hires. If things aren’t fixed, UAL is eventually going to kill a bunch of people. The FAA knows it, TK instructors know it, line pilots know it yet UAL management chooses to ignore it.
Total BS crybaby stuff. How on earth did we ever survive 10 years of a bankruptcy contract then? Were you there? I was.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 02:31 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
khergan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 146
Default

This thread is entirely full of self-righteous chumps who have been huffing their own farts for way too long.

Who cares who it was? I don't think anyone, new hire or the most ancient of b00mers, would intentionally get into the situation. Be glad it wasn't you.
khergan is offline  
Old 08-04-2023, 02:37 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,525
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
This. I just flew with a new hire who is a former 777 CA at Qatar....more than a few from Emirates too.
Yup, I have a good buddy here who was a A380 CA for Emirates here.
Swakid8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scut Farkus
Charter
27
03-27-2020 07:29 PM
SVA402
Technical
34
05-21-2013 05:45 AM
Hawker445
Safety
2
08-22-2012 08:51 AM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
9
04-10-2006 09:51 PM
AIRGUY
Regional
39
01-30-2006 08:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices